在非临床样本中验证西班牙版调整障碍新模块-20 (ADNM-20)。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Soledad Quero, Sara Fernández-Buendía, Jesús Privado, Jorge Grimaldos, Pim Cuijpers
{"title":"在非临床样本中验证西班牙版调整障碍新模块-20 (ADNM-20)。","authors":"Soledad Quero, Sara Fernández-Buendía, Jesús Privado, Jorge Grimaldos, Pim Cuijpers","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02298-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of self-report measures specifically designed for Adjustment disorder. One of the most widely used instruments is the Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM), which has already been validated in different countries. The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the ADNM-20 with a non-clinical sample, including a comparison with a high-risk sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>203 participants of the general population (mean age = 33.84) completed an online survey which included the Spanish version of the ADNM, the anxiety and depression measures GAD-7 and PHQ-9, and an assesment of coping strategies using the Brief-COPE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of the scale's internal structure revealed that a hierarchical model could best fit the data, as well as a bifactorial structure. The scale showed high internal consistency and an adequate differential validity, as differences were observed when comparing the high-risk and non-clinical groups. Positive correlations were also identified between ADNM and depression and anxiety, as well as different correlations with coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents the first validation of the ADNM-20 in Spanish showing good reliability and validity results. In addition, a comparison with a high-risk sample and norms are offered to help future evaluators.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"771"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Spanish version of the Adjustment Disorder New Module-20 (ADNM-20) in a non-clinical sample.\",\"authors\":\"Soledad Quero, Sara Fernández-Buendía, Jesús Privado, Jorge Grimaldos, Pim Cuijpers\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40359-024-02298-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of self-report measures specifically designed for Adjustment disorder. One of the most widely used instruments is the Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM), which has already been validated in different countries. The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the ADNM-20 with a non-clinical sample, including a comparison with a high-risk sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>203 participants of the general population (mean age = 33.84) completed an online survey which included the Spanish version of the ADNM, the anxiety and depression measures GAD-7 and PHQ-9, and an assesment of coping strategies using the Brief-COPE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of the scale's internal structure revealed that a hierarchical model could best fit the data, as well as a bifactorial structure. The scale showed high internal consistency and an adequate differential validity, as differences were observed when comparing the high-risk and non-clinical groups. Positive correlations were also identified between ADNM and depression and anxiety, as well as different correlations with coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents the first validation of the ADNM-20 in Spanish showing good reliability and validity results. In addition, a comparison with a high-risk sample and norms are offered to help future evaluators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663342/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02298-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02298-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前缺乏专门为适应障碍设计的自我报告措施。最广泛使用的仪器之一是调整障碍新模块(ADNM),它已经在不同的国家得到了验证。本研究的目的是在非临床样本中验证西班牙版ADNM-20,包括与高危样本的比较。方法:203名普通人群(平均年龄33.84岁)完成了一项在线调查,包括西班牙语版ADNM,焦虑和抑郁量表GAD-7和PHQ-9,以及使用Brief-COPE评估应对策略。结果:对量表内部结构的分析表明,分层模型最能拟合数据,双因子结构最能拟合数据。量表显示出高度的内部一致性和足够的差异效度,因为在比较高风险组和非临床组时观察到差异。ADNM与抑郁、焦虑呈正相关,与应对策略呈正相关。结论:本研究首次对西班牙语ADNM-20进行了验证,具有良好的信度和效度结果。此外,还提供了与高风险样本和规范的比较,以帮助未来的评估人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of the Spanish version of the Adjustment Disorder New Module-20 (ADNM-20) in a non-clinical sample.

Validation of the Spanish version of the Adjustment Disorder New Module-20 (ADNM-20) in a non-clinical sample.

Validation of the Spanish version of the Adjustment Disorder New Module-20 (ADNM-20) in a non-clinical sample.

Validation of the Spanish version of the Adjustment Disorder New Module-20 (ADNM-20) in a non-clinical sample.

Background: There is a lack of self-report measures specifically designed for Adjustment disorder. One of the most widely used instruments is the Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM), which has already been validated in different countries. The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the ADNM-20 with a non-clinical sample, including a comparison with a high-risk sample.

Method: 203 participants of the general population (mean age = 33.84) completed an online survey which included the Spanish version of the ADNM, the anxiety and depression measures GAD-7 and PHQ-9, and an assesment of coping strategies using the Brief-COPE.

Results: The analysis of the scale's internal structure revealed that a hierarchical model could best fit the data, as well as a bifactorial structure. The scale showed high internal consistency and an adequate differential validity, as differences were observed when comparing the high-risk and non-clinical groups. Positive correlations were also identified between ADNM and depression and anxiety, as well as different correlations with coping strategies.

Conclusion: This study presents the first validation of the ADNM-20 in Spanish showing good reliability and validity results. In addition, a comparison with a high-risk sample and norms are offered to help future evaluators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信