最低二氧化碳是气候控制猪舍系统中猪呼吸健康的关键预测指标。

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Eddiemar Baguio Lagua, Hong-Seok Mun, Keiven Mark Bigtasin Ampode, Hae-Rang Park, Md Sharifuzzaman, Md Kamrul Hasan, Young-Hwa Kim, Chul-Ju Yang
{"title":"最低二氧化碳是气候控制猪舍系统中猪呼吸健康的关键预测指标。","authors":"Eddiemar Baguio Lagua, Hong-Seok Mun, Keiven Mark Bigtasin Ampode, Hae-Rang Park, Md Sharifuzzaman, Md Kamrul Hasan, Young-Hwa Kim, Chul-Ju Yang","doi":"10.1186/s40813-024-00408-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory disease is an economically important disease in the swine industry. Housing air quality control is crucial for maintaining the respiratory health of pigs. However, maintaining air quality is a limitation of current housing systems. This study evaluated the growth and health parameters of pigs raised under different environmental conditions and identified key environmental variables that determine respiratory health. Eighty (Largewhite × Landrace) × Duroc crossed growing pigs (31.71 ± 0.53 kg) were equally distributed into two identical climate-controlled houses with distinct environmental conditions (CON = normal conditions and TRT = poor conditions). Two-sample tests were performed to compare the means of the groups, and a random forest algorithm was used to identify the importance scores of the environmental variables to respiratory health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pigs in the TRT group were significantly exposed to high temperatures (28.44 vs 22.78 °C, p < 0.001), humidity (88.27 vs 61.86%, p < 0.001), CO<sub>2</sub> (2,739.93 vs 847.91 ppm, p < 0.001), NH<sub>3</sub> (20.53 vs 8.18 ppm, p < 0.001), and H<sub>2</sub>S (14.28 vs 6.70 ppm, p < 0.001). Chronic exposure to these factors significantly reduced daily feed intake (1.82 vs 2.32 kg, p = 0.002), resulting in a significant reduction in average daily gain (0.72 vs 0.92 kg, p = 0.026), increased oxidative stress index (3.24 vs 1.43, p = 0.001), reduced cortisol levels (2.23 vs 4.07 mmol/L, p = 0.034), and deteriorated respiratory health status (74.41 vs 97.55, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a random forest model identified Min CO<sub>2</sub>, Min NH<sub>3</sub>, and Avg CO<sub>2</sub> as the best predictors of respiratory health, and CO<sub>2</sub> was strongly correlated with NH<sub>3</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>S concentrations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings emphasize the critical importance of proper environmental management in pig farming and suggest that regular monitoring and control of either CO<sub>2</sub> or NH<sub>3</sub>, facilitated by environmental sensors and integration into intelligent systems, can serve as an effective strategy for improving respiratory health management in pigs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20352,"journal":{"name":"Porcine Health Management","volume":"10 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum carbon dioxide is a key predictor of the respiratory health of pigs in climate-controlled housing systems.\",\"authors\":\"Eddiemar Baguio Lagua, Hong-Seok Mun, Keiven Mark Bigtasin Ampode, Hae-Rang Park, Md Sharifuzzaman, Md Kamrul Hasan, Young-Hwa Kim, Chul-Ju Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40813-024-00408-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory disease is an economically important disease in the swine industry. Housing air quality control is crucial for maintaining the respiratory health of pigs. However, maintaining air quality is a limitation of current housing systems. This study evaluated the growth and health parameters of pigs raised under different environmental conditions and identified key environmental variables that determine respiratory health. Eighty (Largewhite × Landrace) × Duroc crossed growing pigs (31.71 ± 0.53 kg) were equally distributed into two identical climate-controlled houses with distinct environmental conditions (CON = normal conditions and TRT = poor conditions). Two-sample tests were performed to compare the means of the groups, and a random forest algorithm was used to identify the importance scores of the environmental variables to respiratory health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pigs in the TRT group were significantly exposed to high temperatures (28.44 vs 22.78 °C, p < 0.001), humidity (88.27 vs 61.86%, p < 0.001), CO<sub>2</sub> (2,739.93 vs 847.91 ppm, p < 0.001), NH<sub>3</sub> (20.53 vs 8.18 ppm, p < 0.001), and H<sub>2</sub>S (14.28 vs 6.70 ppm, p < 0.001). Chronic exposure to these factors significantly reduced daily feed intake (1.82 vs 2.32 kg, p = 0.002), resulting in a significant reduction in average daily gain (0.72 vs 0.92 kg, p = 0.026), increased oxidative stress index (3.24 vs 1.43, p = 0.001), reduced cortisol levels (2.23 vs 4.07 mmol/L, p = 0.034), and deteriorated respiratory health status (74.41 vs 97.55, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a random forest model identified Min CO<sub>2</sub>, Min NH<sub>3</sub>, and Avg CO<sub>2</sub> as the best predictors of respiratory health, and CO<sub>2</sub> was strongly correlated with NH<sub>3</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>S concentrations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings emphasize the critical importance of proper environmental management in pig farming and suggest that regular monitoring and control of either CO<sub>2</sub> or NH<sub>3</sub>, facilitated by environmental sensors and integration into intelligent systems, can serve as an effective strategy for improving respiratory health management in pigs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Porcine Health Management\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Porcine Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-024-00408-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porcine Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-024-00408-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼吸系统疾病是养猪业中一种重要的经济疾病。猪舍空气质量控制对维持猪的呼吸系统健康至关重要。然而,维持空气质量是当前住房系统的一个限制。本研究评估了在不同环境条件下饲养的猪的生长和健康参数,并确定了决定呼吸健康的关键环境变量。将80头(大白×长)×杜洛克杂交生长猪(31.71±0.53 kg)平均分配到环境条件不同(CON =正常条件,TRT =恶劣条件)的恒温猪舍中。采用双样本检验来比较各组的均值,并采用随机森林算法来确定环境变量对呼吸健康的重要性得分。结果:TRT组猪暴露于高温(28.44 vs 22.78°C, p2 (2,739.93 vs 847.91 ppm), p3 (20.53 vs 8.18 ppm), p2s (14.28 vs 6.70 ppm), p2, Min NH3和Avg CO2是呼吸健康的最佳预测因子,CO2与NH3和H2S浓度密切相关。结论:这些发现强调了养猪业中适当的环境管理的重要性,并表明通过环境传感器和集成到智能系统中,定期监测和控制CO2或NH3可以作为改善猪呼吸健康管理的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimum carbon dioxide is a key predictor of the respiratory health of pigs in climate-controlled housing systems.

Background: Respiratory disease is an economically important disease in the swine industry. Housing air quality control is crucial for maintaining the respiratory health of pigs. However, maintaining air quality is a limitation of current housing systems. This study evaluated the growth and health parameters of pigs raised under different environmental conditions and identified key environmental variables that determine respiratory health. Eighty (Largewhite × Landrace) × Duroc crossed growing pigs (31.71 ± 0.53 kg) were equally distributed into two identical climate-controlled houses with distinct environmental conditions (CON = normal conditions and TRT = poor conditions). Two-sample tests were performed to compare the means of the groups, and a random forest algorithm was used to identify the importance scores of the environmental variables to respiratory health.

Results: Pigs in the TRT group were significantly exposed to high temperatures (28.44 vs 22.78 °C, p < 0.001), humidity (88.27 vs 61.86%, p < 0.001), CO2 (2,739.93 vs 847.91 ppm, p < 0.001), NH3 (20.53 vs 8.18 ppm, p < 0.001), and H2S (14.28 vs 6.70 ppm, p < 0.001). Chronic exposure to these factors significantly reduced daily feed intake (1.82 vs 2.32 kg, p = 0.002), resulting in a significant reduction in average daily gain (0.72 vs 0.92 kg, p = 0.026), increased oxidative stress index (3.24 vs 1.43, p = 0.001), reduced cortisol levels (2.23 vs 4.07 mmol/L, p = 0.034), and deteriorated respiratory health status (74.41 vs 97.55, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a random forest model identified Min CO2, Min NH3, and Avg CO2 as the best predictors of respiratory health, and CO2 was strongly correlated with NH3 and H2S concentrations.

Conclusions: These findings emphasize the critical importance of proper environmental management in pig farming and suggest that regular monitoring and control of either CO2 or NH3, facilitated by environmental sensors and integration into intelligent systems, can serve as an effective strategy for improving respiratory health management in pigs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Porcine Health Management
Porcine Health Management Veterinary-Food Animals
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Porcine Health Management (PHM) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish relevant, novel and revised information regarding all aspects of swine health medicine and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信