支气管挑战在大麻过敏诊断中的作用。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Alicia Armentia Medina, Angel San Miguel, Sara Fernández Cortés, Blanca Martín-Armentia, Fernando Pineda
{"title":"支气管挑战在大麻过敏诊断中的作用。","authors":"Alicia Armentia Medina, Angel San Miguel, Sara Fernández Cortés, Blanca Martín-Armentia, Fernando Pineda","doi":"10.1007/s11882-024-01190-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have read with great interest the recent review published by Dr. Ebo and collaborators on cannabis allergy. It highlights the difficulties in getting a valid diagnosis because some patients do not admit its consumption, which may not be legalized, there are no commercial extracts and there are problems in cutaneous tests interpretation due to cross-reactivity with other related allergens. In addition to this, bronchial challenge is considered the confirmatory diagnosis, but it is complex to perform. This also occurs in diagnosis of occupational asthma, such as in baker's asthma, in which we have investigated a reliable marker to avoid the bronchial challenge. However, we think it is necessary to do this test to ensure a correct etiological diagnosis of cannabis asthma, and we have carried out bronchial challenge with cannabis on more than 600 patients since 2009, all them active consumers. In our country cannabis consumption has not been legalized, but to do this challenges we asked the National Court for permission, which we obtained easily. Although molecular diagnosis has helped in revealing the problems caused by cross-reactivity, the gold standard continues to be the provocation. In our articles we detail how to do it safely, and we encourage our colleagues to reach a definitive diagnosis that cannabis is the cause of their bronchial symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":55198,"journal":{"name":"Current Allergy and Asthma Reports","volume":"25 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bronchial Challenge in the Diagnosis of Cannabis Allergy.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Armentia Medina, Angel San Miguel, Sara Fernández Cortés, Blanca Martín-Armentia, Fernando Pineda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11882-024-01190-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We have read with great interest the recent review published by Dr. Ebo and collaborators on cannabis allergy. It highlights the difficulties in getting a valid diagnosis because some patients do not admit its consumption, which may not be legalized, there are no commercial extracts and there are problems in cutaneous tests interpretation due to cross-reactivity with other related allergens. In addition to this, bronchial challenge is considered the confirmatory diagnosis, but it is complex to perform. This also occurs in diagnosis of occupational asthma, such as in baker's asthma, in which we have investigated a reliable marker to avoid the bronchial challenge. However, we think it is necessary to do this test to ensure a correct etiological diagnosis of cannabis asthma, and we have carried out bronchial challenge with cannabis on more than 600 patients since 2009, all them active consumers. In our country cannabis consumption has not been legalized, but to do this challenges we asked the National Court for permission, which we obtained easily. Although molecular diagnosis has helped in revealing the problems caused by cross-reactivity, the gold standard continues to be the provocation. In our articles we detail how to do it safely, and we encourage our colleagues to reach a definitive diagnosis that cannabis is the cause of their bronchial symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Allergy and Asthma Reports\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Allergy and Asthma Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-024-01190-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Allergy and Asthma Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-024-01190-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们非常感兴趣地阅读了Ebo博士和合作者最近发表的关于大麻过敏的评论。它突出了获得有效诊断的困难,因为一些患者不承认其消费,这可能不合法,没有商业提取物,并且由于与其他相关过敏原的交叉反应,在皮肤测试解释中存在问题。除此之外,支气管挑战被认为是确诊,但执行起来很复杂。这也发生在职业性哮喘的诊断中,例如在贝克氏哮喘中,我们已经研究了一个可靠的标志物来避免支气管挑战。然而,我们认为有必要进行这项测试,以确保大麻哮喘的正确病因诊断,自2009年以来,我们已经对600多名患者进行了大麻支气管挑战,他们都是活跃的消费者。在我国,大麻消费尚未合法化,但为了进行这项挑战,我们向国家法院请求许可,我们很容易获得了许可。虽然分子诊断有助于揭示由交叉反应性引起的问题,但金标准仍然是挑衅。在我们的文章中,我们详细介绍了如何安全地使用它,我们鼓励我们的同事得出一个明确的诊断,大麻是他们支气管症状的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bronchial Challenge in the Diagnosis of Cannabis Allergy.

We have read with great interest the recent review published by Dr. Ebo and collaborators on cannabis allergy. It highlights the difficulties in getting a valid diagnosis because some patients do not admit its consumption, which may not be legalized, there are no commercial extracts and there are problems in cutaneous tests interpretation due to cross-reactivity with other related allergens. In addition to this, bronchial challenge is considered the confirmatory diagnosis, but it is complex to perform. This also occurs in diagnosis of occupational asthma, such as in baker's asthma, in which we have investigated a reliable marker to avoid the bronchial challenge. However, we think it is necessary to do this test to ensure a correct etiological diagnosis of cannabis asthma, and we have carried out bronchial challenge with cannabis on more than 600 patients since 2009, all them active consumers. In our country cannabis consumption has not been legalized, but to do this challenges we asked the National Court for permission, which we obtained easily. Although molecular diagnosis has helped in revealing the problems caused by cross-reactivity, the gold standard continues to be the provocation. In our articles we detail how to do it safely, and we encourage our colleagues to reach a definitive diagnosis that cannabis is the cause of their bronchial symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.80%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Current Allergy and Asthma Reports is to systematically provide the views of highly selected experts on current advances in the fields of allergy and asthma and highlight the most important papers recently published. All reviews are intended to facilitate the understanding of new advances in science for better diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of allergy and asthma. We accomplish this aim by appointing international experts in major subject areas across the discipline to review select topics emphasizing recent developments and highlighting important new papers and emerging concepts. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Over a one- to two-year period, readers are updated on all the major advances in allergy and asthma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信