对肠道病毒基因组的补充见解:使用不同组装器和容器的短读和长读宏基因组的比较基准。

IF 13.8 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Huarui Wang, Chuqing Sun, Yun Li, Jingchao Chen, Xing-Ming Zhao, Wei-Hua Chen
{"title":"对肠道病毒基因组的补充见解:使用不同组装器和容器的短读和长读宏基因组的比较基准。","authors":"Huarui Wang, Chuqing Sun, Yun Li, Jingchao Chen, Xing-Ming Zhao, Wei-Hua Chen","doi":"10.1186/s40168-024-01981-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metagenome-assembled viral genomes have significantly advanced the discovery and characterization of the human gut virome. However, we lack a comparative assessment of assembly tools on the efficacy of viral genome identification, particularly across next-generation sequencing (NGS) and third-generation sequencing (TGS) data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated the efficiency of NGS, TGS, and hybrid assemblers for viral genome discovery using 95 viral-like particle (VLP)-enriched fecal samples sequenced on both Illumina and PacBio platforms. MEGAHIT, metaFlye, and hybridSPAdes emerged as the optimal choices for NGS, TGS, and hybrid datasets, respectively. Notably, these assemblers recovered distinct viral genomes, demonstrating a remarkable degree of complementarity. By combining individual assembler results, we expanded the total number of nonredundant high-quality viral genomes by 4.83 ~ 21.7-fold compared to individual assemblers. Among them, viral genomes from NGS and TGS data have the least overlap, indicating the impact of data type on viral genome recovery. We also evaluated four binning methods, finding that CONCOCT incorporated more unrelated contigs into the same bins, while MetaBAT2, AVAMB, and vRhyme balanced inclusiveness and taxonomic consistency within bins.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the challenges in metagenome-driven viral discovery, underscoring tool limitations. We advocate for combined use of multiple assemblers and sequencing technologies when feasible and highlight the urgent need for specialized tools tailored to gut virome assembly. This study contributes essential insights for advancing viral genome research in the context of gut metagenomics. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":18447,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome","volume":"12 1","pages":"260"},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementary insights into gut viral genomes: a comparative benchmark of short- and long-read metagenomes using diverse assemblers and binners.\",\"authors\":\"Huarui Wang, Chuqing Sun, Yun Li, Jingchao Chen, Xing-Ming Zhao, Wei-Hua Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40168-024-01981-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metagenome-assembled viral genomes have significantly advanced the discovery and characterization of the human gut virome. However, we lack a comparative assessment of assembly tools on the efficacy of viral genome identification, particularly across next-generation sequencing (NGS) and third-generation sequencing (TGS) data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated the efficiency of NGS, TGS, and hybrid assemblers for viral genome discovery using 95 viral-like particle (VLP)-enriched fecal samples sequenced on both Illumina and PacBio platforms. MEGAHIT, metaFlye, and hybridSPAdes emerged as the optimal choices for NGS, TGS, and hybrid datasets, respectively. Notably, these assemblers recovered distinct viral genomes, demonstrating a remarkable degree of complementarity. By combining individual assembler results, we expanded the total number of nonredundant high-quality viral genomes by 4.83 ~ 21.7-fold compared to individual assemblers. Among them, viral genomes from NGS and TGS data have the least overlap, indicating the impact of data type on viral genome recovery. We also evaluated four binning methods, finding that CONCOCT incorporated more unrelated contigs into the same bins, while MetaBAT2, AVAMB, and vRhyme balanced inclusiveness and taxonomic consistency within bins.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the challenges in metagenome-driven viral discovery, underscoring tool limitations. We advocate for combined use of multiple assemblers and sequencing technologies when feasible and highlight the urgent need for specialized tools tailored to gut virome assembly. This study contributes essential insights for advancing viral genome research in the context of gut metagenomics. Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiome\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660840/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01981-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01981-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:宏基因组组装的病毒基因组显著推进了人类肠道病毒的发现和表征。然而,我们缺乏对病毒基因组鉴定效果的组装工具的比较评估,特别是在下一代测序(NGS)和第三代测序(TGS)数据之间。结果:我们利用在Illumina和PacBio平台上测序的95个病毒样颗粒(VLP)富集的粪便样本,评估了NGS、TGS和混合组装器在病毒基因组发现方面的效率。MEGAHIT、metaFlye和hybridSPAdes分别成为NGS、TGS和hybrid数据集的最佳选择。值得注意的是,这些组装者恢复了不同的病毒基因组,显示出显著的互补性。通过结合单个组装器的结果,与单个组装器相比,我们将非冗余高质量病毒基因组的总数增加了4.83 ~ 21.7倍。其中,来自NGS和TGS数据的病毒基因组重叠最少,说明数据类型对病毒基因组恢复的影响。我们还对四种分类方法进行了评估,发现CONCOCT将更多不相关的contigs纳入同一分类箱,而MetaBAT2、AVAMB和vRhyme在分类箱内平衡了包容性和分类一致性。结论:我们的研究结果强调了宏基因组驱动病毒发现的挑战,强调了工具的局限性。我们提倡在可行的情况下联合使用多种组装器和测序技术,并强调迫切需要专门针对肠道病毒体组装的工具。这项研究为在肠道宏基因组学背景下推进病毒基因组研究提供了重要的见解。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complementary insights into gut viral genomes: a comparative benchmark of short- and long-read metagenomes using diverse assemblers and binners.

Background: Metagenome-assembled viral genomes have significantly advanced the discovery and characterization of the human gut virome. However, we lack a comparative assessment of assembly tools on the efficacy of viral genome identification, particularly across next-generation sequencing (NGS) and third-generation sequencing (TGS) data.

Results: We evaluated the efficiency of NGS, TGS, and hybrid assemblers for viral genome discovery using 95 viral-like particle (VLP)-enriched fecal samples sequenced on both Illumina and PacBio platforms. MEGAHIT, metaFlye, and hybridSPAdes emerged as the optimal choices for NGS, TGS, and hybrid datasets, respectively. Notably, these assemblers recovered distinct viral genomes, demonstrating a remarkable degree of complementarity. By combining individual assembler results, we expanded the total number of nonredundant high-quality viral genomes by 4.83 ~ 21.7-fold compared to individual assemblers. Among them, viral genomes from NGS and TGS data have the least overlap, indicating the impact of data type on viral genome recovery. We also evaluated four binning methods, finding that CONCOCT incorporated more unrelated contigs into the same bins, while MetaBAT2, AVAMB, and vRhyme balanced inclusiveness and taxonomic consistency within bins.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the challenges in metagenome-driven viral discovery, underscoring tool limitations. We advocate for combined use of multiple assemblers and sequencing technologies when feasible and highlight the urgent need for specialized tools tailored to gut virome assembly. This study contributes essential insights for advancing viral genome research in the context of gut metagenomics. Video Abstract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiome
Microbiome MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiome is a journal that focuses on studies of microbiomes in humans, animals, plants, and the environment. It covers both natural and manipulated microbiomes, such as those in agriculture. The journal is interested in research that uses meta-omics approaches or novel bioinformatics tools and emphasizes the community/host interaction and structure-function relationship within the microbiome. Studies that go beyond descriptive omics surveys and include experimental or theoretical approaches will be considered for publication. The journal also encourages research that establishes cause and effect relationships and supports proposed microbiome functions. However, studies of individual microbial isolates/species without exploring their impact on the host or the complex microbiome structures and functions will not be considered for publication. Microbiome is indexed in BIOSIS, Current Contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citations Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信