高频短时间射频消融术治疗典型心房扑动:FASD-HP随机试验的基本原理和设计

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Laura Valverde Soria, Jorge Toquero, Thomas Brouzet, Laura García Cano, Ana García Barrios, Melodie Segura Domínguez, Gloria A Hermón Ramírez, Raquel Ajo Ferrer, María Ajo Ferrer, Celia María Andreu Concha, Vicente Arrarte Esteban, Angel Sánchez Barbié, Juan Gabriel Martínez-Martínez, Alicia Ibáñez Criado, José Luis Ibáñez Criado
{"title":"高频短时间射频消融术治疗典型心房扑动:FASD-HP随机试验的基本原理和设计","authors":"Laura Valverde Soria, Jorge Toquero, Thomas Brouzet, Laura García Cano, Ana García Barrios, Melodie Segura Domínguez, Gloria A Hermón Ramírez, Raquel Ajo Ferrer, María Ajo Ferrer, Celia María Andreu Concha, Vicente Arrarte Esteban, Angel Sánchez Barbié, Juan Gabriel Martínez-Martínez, Alicia Ibáñez Criado, José Luis Ibáñez Criado","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01969-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent flutter ablation is the bidirectional conduction block of the CTI. Very-high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency ablation aims to minimize conductive heating and increase resistive heating to create shallower but wider lesions in a very short time, while reducing the risk of collateral tissue damage. Experimental studies have shown that it produces effective transmural lesions with an equal or better safety profile compared to conventional parameters. There are published and ongoing trials studying long-term outcomes of this technique for pulmonary vein isolation, but there is a lack of evidence regarding its use in flutter ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Multicenter 1:1 randomized, single-blind study. Two CTI ablation strategies are compared: (1) conventional treatment arm consisting of 25-40-W applications of unlimited duration until reaching the minimum value of one of the currently accepted lesion markers (Ablation Index > 500 at the anterior half of the CTI and > 400 at the posterior half with CARTO3 system); (2) experimental treatment arm consisting of CTI block using point-by-point applications of very-high-power (90 W) short duration (4 s). The primary objective is to evaluate the non-inferiority of the efficacy and safety of vHPSD ablation in patients undergoing typical flutter ablation. Secondary objectives include comparison of total radiofrequency time, number of applications, number of steam pops, percentage of reconnections, procedure duration, pain during the procedure, and time to flutter recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FASD-HP trial is the first clinical trial to investigate the non-inferiority of CTI ablation with vHPSD in patients with typical atrial flutter.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>The study was registered at http://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov (NCT05777850) on March 21, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter: rationale and design of the FASD-HP randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Valverde Soria, Jorge Toquero, Thomas Brouzet, Laura García Cano, Ana García Barrios, Melodie Segura Domínguez, Gloria A Hermón Ramírez, Raquel Ajo Ferrer, María Ajo Ferrer, Celia María Andreu Concha, Vicente Arrarte Esteban, Angel Sánchez Barbié, Juan Gabriel Martínez-Martínez, Alicia Ibáñez Criado, José Luis Ibáñez Criado\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01969-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent flutter ablation is the bidirectional conduction block of the CTI. Very-high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency ablation aims to minimize conductive heating and increase resistive heating to create shallower but wider lesions in a very short time, while reducing the risk of collateral tissue damage. Experimental studies have shown that it produces effective transmural lesions with an equal or better safety profile compared to conventional parameters. There are published and ongoing trials studying long-term outcomes of this technique for pulmonary vein isolation, but there is a lack of evidence regarding its use in flutter ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Multicenter 1:1 randomized, single-blind study. Two CTI ablation strategies are compared: (1) conventional treatment arm consisting of 25-40-W applications of unlimited duration until reaching the minimum value of one of the currently accepted lesion markers (Ablation Index > 500 at the anterior half of the CTI and > 400 at the posterior half with CARTO3 system); (2) experimental treatment arm consisting of CTI block using point-by-point applications of very-high-power (90 W) short duration (4 s). The primary objective is to evaluate the non-inferiority of the efficacy and safety of vHPSD ablation in patients undergoing typical flutter ablation. Secondary objectives include comparison of total radiofrequency time, number of applications, number of steam pops, percentage of reconnections, procedure duration, pain during the procedure, and time to flutter recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FASD-HP trial is the first clinical trial to investigate the non-inferiority of CTI ablation with vHPSD in patients with typical atrial flutter.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>The study was registered at http://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov (NCT05777850) on March 21, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01969-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01969-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈三尖瓣峡部相关颤振消融的目的是阻断颈三尖瓣峡部的双向传导。甚高功率短持续时间(vHPSD)射频消融旨在最大限度地减少导电加热,增加电阻加热,在很短的时间内产生更浅但更宽的病变,同时降低附带组织损伤的风险。实验研究表明,与常规参数相比,它产生有效的跨壁病变,具有相同或更好的安全性。已经发表的和正在进行的试验研究了该技术用于肺静脉隔离的长期结果,但缺乏关于其在颤振消融中的应用的证据。方法与结果:多中心1:1随机、单盲研究。比较两种CTI消融策略:(1)常规治疗组由25-40-W应用组成,无限持续,直到达到目前公认的病变标志物之一的最小值(使用CARTO3系统,CTI前半部的消融指数bbb500和后半部的bbb400);(2)由CTI块组成的实验治疗组,采用非常高功率(90 W)短时间(4 s)逐点应用。主要目的是评估vHPSD消融在典型颤振消融患者中的有效性和安全性的非效性。次要目标包括比较总射频时间、应用次数、蒸汽间隔次数、重新连接的百分比、手术持续时间、手术过程中的疼痛和颤振复发的时间。结论:FASD-HP试验是首个研究CTI消融联合vHPSD治疗典型心房扑动患者非劣效性的临床试验。临床试验注册号:该研究于2023年3月21日在http://www.Clinicaltrials: gov (NCT05777850)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter: rationale and design of the FASD-HP randomized trial.

Background: The aim of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent flutter ablation is the bidirectional conduction block of the CTI. Very-high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency ablation aims to minimize conductive heating and increase resistive heating to create shallower but wider lesions in a very short time, while reducing the risk of collateral tissue damage. Experimental studies have shown that it produces effective transmural lesions with an equal or better safety profile compared to conventional parameters. There are published and ongoing trials studying long-term outcomes of this technique for pulmonary vein isolation, but there is a lack of evidence regarding its use in flutter ablation.

Methods and results: Multicenter 1:1 randomized, single-blind study. Two CTI ablation strategies are compared: (1) conventional treatment arm consisting of 25-40-W applications of unlimited duration until reaching the minimum value of one of the currently accepted lesion markers (Ablation Index > 500 at the anterior half of the CTI and > 400 at the posterior half with CARTO3 system); (2) experimental treatment arm consisting of CTI block using point-by-point applications of very-high-power (90 W) short duration (4 s). The primary objective is to evaluate the non-inferiority of the efficacy and safety of vHPSD ablation in patients undergoing typical flutter ablation. Secondary objectives include comparison of total radiofrequency time, number of applications, number of steam pops, percentage of reconnections, procedure duration, pain during the procedure, and time to flutter recurrence.

Conclusions: The FASD-HP trial is the first clinical trial to investigate the non-inferiority of CTI ablation with vHPSD in patients with typical atrial flutter.

Clinical trial registration number: The study was registered at http://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov (NCT05777850) on March 21, 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信