{"title":"德国与社会孤立和孤独相关的负效用:使用EQ-5D-5L仪器的人口调查结果。","authors":"Hans-Helmut König, André Hajek","doi":"10.1186/s12955-024-02329-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social isolation and loneliness are highly prevalent and may have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The EQ-5D-5L is a widely used questionnaire from which an index value for HRQL based on societal preferences (utility) can be derived. The purpose of this study was to estimate the loss in utility (i.e. disutility) associated with loneliness and social isolation in the German adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from a quota sample of individuals aged 18-74 years residing in Germany (n = 5,000) and representing the adult population in terms of age groups, gender and geographic locations. Data collection was conducted online in August and September 2023 by a certified market research firm. The EQ-5D-5L index score based on the German value set was used as outcome. Moreover, the established Lubben Social Network Scale was used to measure social isolation. The De Jong Gierveld tool was used to quantify loneliness. Groups affected by social isolation or loneliness were compared to non-affected groups, respectively. Differences in covariates between affected and non-affected groups were balanced using entropy balancing. Linear regressions were conducted afterwards (using the weights derived from the entropy balancing). Subgroup analyses by sex and age groups as well as various robustness checks were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EQ-5D-5L index score was lower among individuals with social isolation compared to individuals without social isolation (β=-0.04, p < 0.001). Moreover, the EQ-5D-5L index score was lower among individuals with loneliness compared to individuals without loneliness (β=-0.07, p < 0.001). Several robustness checks produced similar results. The findings were almost the same for both women and men and varied only slightly between age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a statistically significant and relevant disutility associated with social isolation and, even more pronounced, with loneliness. The magnitude of disutilities is similar to those reported for various chronic diseases. Taking into account the high prevalence of social isolation and, in particular, loneliness, the associated burden in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) lost is likely to be tremendous. The results underline the need to take action against the high prevalence of loneliness and social isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"22 1","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disutility associated with social isolation and loneliness in Germany: results of a population survey using the EQ-5D-5L instrument.\",\"authors\":\"Hans-Helmut König, André Hajek\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12955-024-02329-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social isolation and loneliness are highly prevalent and may have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The EQ-5D-5L is a widely used questionnaire from which an index value for HRQL based on societal preferences (utility) can be derived. The purpose of this study was to estimate the loss in utility (i.e. disutility) associated with loneliness and social isolation in the German adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from a quota sample of individuals aged 18-74 years residing in Germany (n = 5,000) and representing the adult population in terms of age groups, gender and geographic locations. Data collection was conducted online in August and September 2023 by a certified market research firm. The EQ-5D-5L index score based on the German value set was used as outcome. Moreover, the established Lubben Social Network Scale was used to measure social isolation. The De Jong Gierveld tool was used to quantify loneliness. Groups affected by social isolation or loneliness were compared to non-affected groups, respectively. Differences in covariates between affected and non-affected groups were balanced using entropy balancing. Linear regressions were conducted afterwards (using the weights derived from the entropy balancing). Subgroup analyses by sex and age groups as well as various robustness checks were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EQ-5D-5L index score was lower among individuals with social isolation compared to individuals without social isolation (β=-0.04, p < 0.001). Moreover, the EQ-5D-5L index score was lower among individuals with loneliness compared to individuals without loneliness (β=-0.07, p < 0.001). Several robustness checks produced similar results. The findings were almost the same for both women and men and varied only slightly between age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a statistically significant and relevant disutility associated with social isolation and, even more pronounced, with loneliness. The magnitude of disutilities is similar to those reported for various chronic diseases. Taking into account the high prevalence of social isolation and, in particular, loneliness, the associated burden in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) lost is likely to be tremendous. The results underline the need to take action against the high prevalence of loneliness and social isolation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02329-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02329-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:社会隔离和孤独非常普遍,可能对健康相关生活质量(HRQL)产生负面影响。EQ-5D-5L是一份广泛使用的问卷,从中可以得出基于社会偏好(效用)的HRQL指数值。本研究的目的是估计德国成年人中与孤独和社会隔离相关的效用损失(即负效用)。方法:数据来自居住在德国的18-74岁个人的配额样本(n = 5,000),代表年龄,性别和地理位置的成年人口。数据收集于2023年8月和9月由一家认证市场研究公司在线进行。采用基于德国值集的EQ-5D-5L指数评分作为结果。此外,采用已编制的Lubben社会网络量表对社会隔离进行测量。De Jong Gierveld工具被用来量化孤独感。受社会孤立或孤独影响的群体与未受影响的群体分别进行了比较。用熵平衡法平衡受影响组和未受影响组之间协变量的差异。然后进行线性回归(使用从熵平衡中得到的权重)。按性别和年龄组进行亚组分析,并进行各种稳健性检查。结果:有社会隔离的个体EQ-5D-5L指数得分低于没有社会隔离的个体(β=-0.04, p)。结论:我们发现社会隔离与负效用有统计学意义,负效用与孤独感相关,甚至更明显。效用不足的程度与各种慢性病的报告相似。考虑到社会孤立,特别是孤独感的普遍存在,由此造成的质量调整生命年损失可能是巨大的。调查结果强调,有必要采取行动,消除普遍存在的孤独和社会孤立现象。
Disutility associated with social isolation and loneliness in Germany: results of a population survey using the EQ-5D-5L instrument.
Background: Social isolation and loneliness are highly prevalent and may have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The EQ-5D-5L is a widely used questionnaire from which an index value for HRQL based on societal preferences (utility) can be derived. The purpose of this study was to estimate the loss in utility (i.e. disutility) associated with loneliness and social isolation in the German adult population.
Methods: Data came from a quota sample of individuals aged 18-74 years residing in Germany (n = 5,000) and representing the adult population in terms of age groups, gender and geographic locations. Data collection was conducted online in August and September 2023 by a certified market research firm. The EQ-5D-5L index score based on the German value set was used as outcome. Moreover, the established Lubben Social Network Scale was used to measure social isolation. The De Jong Gierveld tool was used to quantify loneliness. Groups affected by social isolation or loneliness were compared to non-affected groups, respectively. Differences in covariates between affected and non-affected groups were balanced using entropy balancing. Linear regressions were conducted afterwards (using the weights derived from the entropy balancing). Subgroup analyses by sex and age groups as well as various robustness checks were conducted.
Results: The EQ-5D-5L index score was lower among individuals with social isolation compared to individuals without social isolation (β=-0.04, p < 0.001). Moreover, the EQ-5D-5L index score was lower among individuals with loneliness compared to individuals without loneliness (β=-0.07, p < 0.001). Several robustness checks produced similar results. The findings were almost the same for both women and men and varied only slightly between age groups.
Conclusions: We found a statistically significant and relevant disutility associated with social isolation and, even more pronounced, with loneliness. The magnitude of disutilities is similar to those reported for various chronic diseases. Taking into account the high prevalence of social isolation and, in particular, loneliness, the associated burden in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) lost is likely to be tremendous. The results underline the need to take action against the high prevalence of loneliness and social isolation.
期刊介绍:
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.