卫生系统采购专业人员在采购中考虑公平的途径。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016
Katrina E Hauschildt, Taylor Bernstein, Deidra C Crews, Emmanuel F Drabo, Kadija Ferryman, John W Jackson, Thomas S Valley, Joseph Levy, Theodore J Iwashyna
{"title":"卫生系统采购专业人员在采购中考虑公平的途径。","authors":"Katrina E Hauschildt, Taylor Bernstein, Deidra C Crews, Emmanuel F Drabo, Kadija Ferryman, John W Jackson, Thomas S Valley, Joseph Levy, Theodore J Iwashyna","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuing data on racial bias in pulse oximeters and artificial intelligence has sparked calls for health systems to drive innovation against racial bias in health care device and artificial intelligence markets by incorporating equity concerns explicitly into purchasing decisions.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do health care purchasing professionals integrate equity concerns into purchasing decision-making?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Between August 2023 and March 2024, we conducted semistructured interviews via videoconferencing with health care purchasing professionals about purchasing processes for pulse oximeters and other devices-and whether and where equity concerns arise in decision-making. An abductive approach was used to analyze perspectives on how equity and disparity concerns currently are integrated into health care purchasing decision-making. Health care purchasing professionals (N = 30) worked in varied supply chain roles for various health systems and supply chain support and consulting companies across the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health care purchasing professionals described limited considerations of equity in current purchasing processes. They described some receptivity to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, largely focused on diversifying suppliers, rather than ensuring that devices and products functioned equitably. Respondents reported that they depended on clinician partners to raise and delineate requirements for equitable performance. Respondents also depicted current sources of evidence used in making purchasing decisions as providing limited information about equitable performance and that large contracts, including with group purchasing organizations, may limit purchasing options.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Health system purchasing professionals suggested interest and some nascent successes in diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations in health system purchasing processes, including diverse supplier initiatives, but also expressed a need for strong clinical partnership to ensure equitable performance. Explicit approaches for incorporating equitable performance into health care purchasing likely are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health System Purchasing Professionals' Approaches to Considering Equity in Procurement.\",\"authors\":\"Katrina E Hauschildt, Taylor Bernstein, Deidra C Crews, Emmanuel F Drabo, Kadija Ferryman, John W Jackson, Thomas S Valley, Joseph Levy, Theodore J Iwashyna\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuing data on racial bias in pulse oximeters and artificial intelligence has sparked calls for health systems to drive innovation against racial bias in health care device and artificial intelligence markets by incorporating equity concerns explicitly into purchasing decisions.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do health care purchasing professionals integrate equity concerns into purchasing decision-making?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Between August 2023 and March 2024, we conducted semistructured interviews via videoconferencing with health care purchasing professionals about purchasing processes for pulse oximeters and other devices-and whether and where equity concerns arise in decision-making. An abductive approach was used to analyze perspectives on how equity and disparity concerns currently are integrated into health care purchasing decision-making. Health care purchasing professionals (N = 30) worked in varied supply chain roles for various health systems and supply chain support and consulting companies across the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health care purchasing professionals described limited considerations of equity in current purchasing processes. They described some receptivity to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, largely focused on diversifying suppliers, rather than ensuring that devices and products functioned equitably. Respondents reported that they depended on clinician partners to raise and delineate requirements for equitable performance. Respondents also depicted current sources of evidence used in making purchasing decisions as providing limited information about equitable performance and that large contracts, including with group purchasing organizations, may limit purchasing options.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Health system purchasing professionals suggested interest and some nascent successes in diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations in health system purchasing processes, including diverse supplier initiatives, but also expressed a need for strong clinical partnership to ensure equitable performance. Explicit approaches for incorporating equitable performance into health care purchasing likely are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于脉搏血氧仪和人工智能中的种族偏见的持续数据引发了人们的呼吁,要求卫生系统通过将公平问题明确纳入购买决策,推动创新,消除医疗设备和人工智能市场中的种族偏见。研究问题:医疗保健采购专业人员如何将公平考虑纳入采购决策?研究设计和方法:在2023年8月至2024年3月期间,我们通过视频会议与医疗采购专业人员进行了半结构化访谈,内容涉及脉搏血氧仪和其他设备的采购流程,以及决策过程中是否以及在何处出现了公平问题。采用诱变的方法来分析目前如何将公平和差距问题纳入医疗采购决策的观点。医疗保健采购专业人员(N=30)在美国各地的各种医疗系统和供应链支持和咨询公司担任不同的供应链角色。结果:医疗保健采购专业人员描述了当前采购过程中有限的公平考虑。他们描述了一些对多样性、公平性和包容性倡议的接受程度,这些倡议主要侧重于供应商的多样化,而不是确保设备和产品的公平运行。答复者报告说,他们依靠临床合作伙伴提出和描述公平表现的要求。答复者还认为,目前用于采购决策的证据来源提供的关于公平绩效的信息有限,而且包括与团购组织(gpo)签订的大合同可能会限制采购选择。解释:卫生系统采购专业人员提出了对卫生系统采购过程中多样性、公平性和包容性考虑的兴趣和一些初步成功,包括多样化的供应商倡议,但也需要强有力的临床伙伴关系以确保公平绩效。可能需要将公平绩效纳入医疗保健采购的明确方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health System Purchasing Professionals' Approaches to Considering Equity in Procurement.

Background: Continuing data on racial bias in pulse oximeters and artificial intelligence has sparked calls for health systems to drive innovation against racial bias in health care device and artificial intelligence markets by incorporating equity concerns explicitly into purchasing decisions.

Research question: How do health care purchasing professionals integrate equity concerns into purchasing decision-making?

Study design and methods: Between August 2023 and March 2024, we conducted semistructured interviews via videoconferencing with health care purchasing professionals about purchasing processes for pulse oximeters and other devices-and whether and where equity concerns arise in decision-making. An abductive approach was used to analyze perspectives on how equity and disparity concerns currently are integrated into health care purchasing decision-making. Health care purchasing professionals (N = 30) worked in varied supply chain roles for various health systems and supply chain support and consulting companies across the United States.

Results: Health care purchasing professionals described limited considerations of equity in current purchasing processes. They described some receptivity to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, largely focused on diversifying suppliers, rather than ensuring that devices and products functioned equitably. Respondents reported that they depended on clinician partners to raise and delineate requirements for equitable performance. Respondents also depicted current sources of evidence used in making purchasing decisions as providing limited information about equitable performance and that large contracts, including with group purchasing organizations, may limit purchasing options.

Interpretation: Health system purchasing professionals suggested interest and some nascent successes in diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations in health system purchasing processes, including diverse supplier initiatives, but also expressed a need for strong clinical partnership to ensure equitable performance. Explicit approaches for incorporating equitable performance into health care purchasing likely are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信