散发性双侧肾细胞癌的长期生存结局和手术治疗的优化:一项大规模人群队列研究。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ruiyi Deng, Jianhui Qiu, Jiaheng Shang, Chaojian Yu, Peidong Tian, Zihou Zhao, Lin Cai, Jingcheng Zhou, Kan Gong
{"title":"散发性双侧肾细胞癌的长期生存结局和手术治疗的优化:一项大规模人群队列研究。","authors":"Ruiyi Deng, Jianhui Qiu, Jiaheng Shang, Chaojian Yu, Peidong Tian, Zihou Zhao, Lin Cai, Jingcheng Zhou, Kan Gong","doi":"10.1007/s10238-024-01535-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma (BRCC) is a rare situation of RCC. The treatment for BRCC is controversial and there is a lack of authoritative guidelines about the management of BRCC. Patients diagnosed with sporadic BRCC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, and competing risk regression models were used to compare survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors. A total of 20,523 patients (16,534 unilateral RCC [URCC] patients and 3989 BRCC patients) were included. The prognosis of BRCC patients is between metastatic and non-metastatic URCC patients. 3677 patients were diagnosed with localized BRCC (2180 synchronous BRCC patients and 1497 metachronous BRCC patients). Compared with metachronous BRCC, synchronous BRCC patients had relatively poor OS. However, the CSS was similar. Partial nephrectomy (PN) leads to the best OS and provides equivalent oncological outcomes to radical nephrectomy. Local tumor destruction (LTD) could also achieve an acceptable cancer-control effect. Then we developed treatment flowchart for localized BRCC patients. Additionally, we identified the prognostic factors, and analyzed the association between factors using the multivariable Cox regression method. PN should be the initial treatment for sporadic localized BRCC patients if feasible. LTD could be considered as an effective treatment alternative. This study could provide evidence for the optimization of individualized treatment for sporadic BRCC patients.Trial registration: The trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06369519).</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The long-term survival outcome of sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma and optimization of surgical treatment: a large-scale population-based cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ruiyi Deng, Jianhui Qiu, Jiaheng Shang, Chaojian Yu, Peidong Tian, Zihou Zhao, Lin Cai, Jingcheng Zhou, Kan Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10238-024-01535-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma (BRCC) is a rare situation of RCC. The treatment for BRCC is controversial and there is a lack of authoritative guidelines about the management of BRCC. Patients diagnosed with sporadic BRCC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, and competing risk regression models were used to compare survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors. A total of 20,523 patients (16,534 unilateral RCC [URCC] patients and 3989 BRCC patients) were included. The prognosis of BRCC patients is between metastatic and non-metastatic URCC patients. 3677 patients were diagnosed with localized BRCC (2180 synchronous BRCC patients and 1497 metachronous BRCC patients). Compared with metachronous BRCC, synchronous BRCC patients had relatively poor OS. However, the CSS was similar. Partial nephrectomy (PN) leads to the best OS and provides equivalent oncological outcomes to radical nephrectomy. Local tumor destruction (LTD) could also achieve an acceptable cancer-control effect. Then we developed treatment flowchart for localized BRCC patients. Additionally, we identified the prognostic factors, and analyzed the association between factors using the multivariable Cox regression method. PN should be the initial treatment for sporadic localized BRCC patients if feasible. LTD could be considered as an effective treatment alternative. This study could provide evidence for the optimization of individualized treatment for sporadic BRCC patients.Trial registration: The trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06369519).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01535-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01535-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

散发双侧肾细胞癌(BRCC)是一种罕见的肾细胞癌。BRCC的治疗是有争议的,缺乏关于BRCC管理的权威指南。从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定2004年至2020年间诊断为散发性BRCC的患者。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析、Cox回归分析和竞争风险回归模型用于比较生存结果和确定预后因素。共纳入20,523例患者(16,534例单侧RCC [URCC]患者和3989例BRCC患者)。BRCC患者预后介于转移性和非转移性URCC患者之间。3677例患者被诊断为局限性BRCC(2180例为同步BRCC, 1497例为异时BRCC)。与异时BRCC相比,同步BRCC患者的OS相对较差。然而,CSS是相似的。部分肾切除术(PN)可获得最佳的OS,并提供与根治性肾切除术相当的肿瘤学结果。局部肿瘤破坏(Local tumor destruction, LTD)也能达到较好的抑癌效果。然后我们制定了局部BRCC患者的治疗流程图。此外,我们确定了预后因素,并使用多变量Cox回归方法分析了因素之间的相关性。如果可行,对于散发的局部BRCC患者,PN应作为初始治疗。有限责任公司可以被认为是一种有效的治疗方案。本研究可为散发性BRCC患者的个体化治疗优化提供依据。试验注册:该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06369519)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The long-term survival outcome of sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma and optimization of surgical treatment: a large-scale population-based cohort study.

Sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma (BRCC) is a rare situation of RCC. The treatment for BRCC is controversial and there is a lack of authoritative guidelines about the management of BRCC. Patients diagnosed with sporadic BRCC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, and competing risk regression models were used to compare survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors. A total of 20,523 patients (16,534 unilateral RCC [URCC] patients and 3989 BRCC patients) were included. The prognosis of BRCC patients is between metastatic and non-metastatic URCC patients. 3677 patients were diagnosed with localized BRCC (2180 synchronous BRCC patients and 1497 metachronous BRCC patients). Compared with metachronous BRCC, synchronous BRCC patients had relatively poor OS. However, the CSS was similar. Partial nephrectomy (PN) leads to the best OS and provides equivalent oncological outcomes to radical nephrectomy. Local tumor destruction (LTD) could also achieve an acceptable cancer-control effect. Then we developed treatment flowchart for localized BRCC patients. Additionally, we identified the prognostic factors, and analyzed the association between factors using the multivariable Cox regression method. PN should be the initial treatment for sporadic localized BRCC patients if feasible. LTD could be considered as an effective treatment alternative. This study could provide evidence for the optimization of individualized treatment for sporadic BRCC patients.Trial registration: The trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06369519).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信