Ruiyi Deng, Jianhui Qiu, Jiaheng Shang, Chaojian Yu, Peidong Tian, Zihou Zhao, Lin Cai, Jingcheng Zhou, Kan Gong
{"title":"散发性双侧肾细胞癌的长期生存结局和手术治疗的优化:一项大规模人群队列研究。","authors":"Ruiyi Deng, Jianhui Qiu, Jiaheng Shang, Chaojian Yu, Peidong Tian, Zihou Zhao, Lin Cai, Jingcheng Zhou, Kan Gong","doi":"10.1007/s10238-024-01535-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma (BRCC) is a rare situation of RCC. The treatment for BRCC is controversial and there is a lack of authoritative guidelines about the management of BRCC. Patients diagnosed with sporadic BRCC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, and competing risk regression models were used to compare survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors. A total of 20,523 patients (16,534 unilateral RCC [URCC] patients and 3989 BRCC patients) were included. The prognosis of BRCC patients is between metastatic and non-metastatic URCC patients. 3677 patients were diagnosed with localized BRCC (2180 synchronous BRCC patients and 1497 metachronous BRCC patients). Compared with metachronous BRCC, synchronous BRCC patients had relatively poor OS. However, the CSS was similar. Partial nephrectomy (PN) leads to the best OS and provides equivalent oncological outcomes to radical nephrectomy. Local tumor destruction (LTD) could also achieve an acceptable cancer-control effect. Then we developed treatment flowchart for localized BRCC patients. Additionally, we identified the prognostic factors, and analyzed the association between factors using the multivariable Cox regression method. PN should be the initial treatment for sporadic localized BRCC patients if feasible. LTD could be considered as an effective treatment alternative. This study could provide evidence for the optimization of individualized treatment for sporadic BRCC patients.Trial registration: The trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06369519).</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The long-term survival outcome of sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma and optimization of surgical treatment: a large-scale population-based cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ruiyi Deng, Jianhui Qiu, Jiaheng Shang, Chaojian Yu, Peidong Tian, Zihou Zhao, Lin Cai, Jingcheng Zhou, Kan Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10238-024-01535-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma (BRCC) is a rare situation of RCC. The treatment for BRCC is controversial and there is a lack of authoritative guidelines about the management of BRCC. Patients diagnosed with sporadic BRCC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, and competing risk regression models were used to compare survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors. A total of 20,523 patients (16,534 unilateral RCC [URCC] patients and 3989 BRCC patients) were included. The prognosis of BRCC patients is between metastatic and non-metastatic URCC patients. 3677 patients were diagnosed with localized BRCC (2180 synchronous BRCC patients and 1497 metachronous BRCC patients). Compared with metachronous BRCC, synchronous BRCC patients had relatively poor OS. However, the CSS was similar. Partial nephrectomy (PN) leads to the best OS and provides equivalent oncological outcomes to radical nephrectomy. Local tumor destruction (LTD) could also achieve an acceptable cancer-control effect. Then we developed treatment flowchart for localized BRCC patients. Additionally, we identified the prognostic factors, and analyzed the association between factors using the multivariable Cox regression method. PN should be the initial treatment for sporadic localized BRCC patients if feasible. LTD could be considered as an effective treatment alternative. This study could provide evidence for the optimization of individualized treatment for sporadic BRCC patients.Trial registration: The trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06369519).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01535-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01535-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The long-term survival outcome of sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma and optimization of surgical treatment: a large-scale population-based cohort study.
Sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma (BRCC) is a rare situation of RCC. The treatment for BRCC is controversial and there is a lack of authoritative guidelines about the management of BRCC. Patients diagnosed with sporadic BRCC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, and competing risk regression models were used to compare survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors. A total of 20,523 patients (16,534 unilateral RCC [URCC] patients and 3989 BRCC patients) were included. The prognosis of BRCC patients is between metastatic and non-metastatic URCC patients. 3677 patients were diagnosed with localized BRCC (2180 synchronous BRCC patients and 1497 metachronous BRCC patients). Compared with metachronous BRCC, synchronous BRCC patients had relatively poor OS. However, the CSS was similar. Partial nephrectomy (PN) leads to the best OS and provides equivalent oncological outcomes to radical nephrectomy. Local tumor destruction (LTD) could also achieve an acceptable cancer-control effect. Then we developed treatment flowchart for localized BRCC patients. Additionally, we identified the prognostic factors, and analyzed the association between factors using the multivariable Cox regression method. PN should be the initial treatment for sporadic localized BRCC patients if feasible. LTD could be considered as an effective treatment alternative. This study could provide evidence for the optimization of individualized treatment for sporadic BRCC patients.Trial registration: The trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06369519).
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.