数字鸿沟作为美国老年人健康的决定因素:流行程度、趋势和风险因素

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Rumei Yang, Shiying Gao, Yun Jiang
{"title":"数字鸿沟作为美国老年人健康的决定因素:流行程度、趋势和风险因素","authors":"Rumei Yang, Shiying Gao, Yun Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05612-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rapid development of digital technologies has fundamentally changed the care for older adults. However, not all older adults have equal opportunities to access and use the technologies, more importantly, be able to benefit from the technologies. We aimed to explore (1) the prevalence and the trend in the prevalence of digital divide in older adults, including digital access gap, digital use gap (specifically, using digital technologies for health commutation [e-communication gap]), and self-efficacy in information seeking gap (cognitive gap); (2) sociodemographic factors related to three perspectives of digital divide; and (3) the association between digital divide and self-rated health (exploratory).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults aged 65 years or older (N = 5,671, weighted mean [SD] age = 74.26 [10.09] years) from the Health Information National Trends Surveys (2017-2020) were analyzed using the weighted logistic and linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant linear decrease in the adjusted prevalence of digital access gap (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.94) and the e-communication gap (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82, 0.95) over time. However, there were no significant changes in cognitive gap between 2017 and 2019, and between 2018 and 2020. Overall, older adults with digital divide were more likely to be less educated, have less income, and self-identified as Hispanic people. Univariate analyses found that three perspectives of digital divide were significantly associated with poor self-rated health. Multivariate analyses adjusted for covariates (e.g., age and sex) found that the access gap but not the e-commutation gap was associated with self-rated health and that cognitive gap was only associated with self-rated health between 2018 and 2020 but not between 2017 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital divide is decreasing but remains persistent and disproportionately affects self-rated health of older adults, particularly those who are socially disadvantaged (e.g., lower education and income). Continued efforts are needed to address digital divide among them.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"1027"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital divide as a determinant of health in the U.S. older adults: prevalence, trends, and risk factors.\",\"authors\":\"Rumei Yang, Shiying Gao, Yun Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-024-05612-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rapid development of digital technologies has fundamentally changed the care for older adults. However, not all older adults have equal opportunities to access and use the technologies, more importantly, be able to benefit from the technologies. We aimed to explore (1) the prevalence and the trend in the prevalence of digital divide in older adults, including digital access gap, digital use gap (specifically, using digital technologies for health commutation [e-communication gap]), and self-efficacy in information seeking gap (cognitive gap); (2) sociodemographic factors related to three perspectives of digital divide; and (3) the association between digital divide and self-rated health (exploratory).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults aged 65 years or older (N = 5,671, weighted mean [SD] age = 74.26 [10.09] years) from the Health Information National Trends Surveys (2017-2020) were analyzed using the weighted logistic and linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant linear decrease in the adjusted prevalence of digital access gap (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.94) and the e-communication gap (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82, 0.95) over time. However, there were no significant changes in cognitive gap between 2017 and 2019, and between 2018 and 2020. Overall, older adults with digital divide were more likely to be less educated, have less income, and self-identified as Hispanic people. Univariate analyses found that three perspectives of digital divide were significantly associated with poor self-rated health. Multivariate analyses adjusted for covariates (e.g., age and sex) found that the access gap but not the e-commutation gap was associated with self-rated health and that cognitive gap was only associated with self-rated health between 2018 and 2020 but not between 2017 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital divide is decreasing but remains persistent and disproportionately affects self-rated health of older adults, particularly those who are socially disadvantaged (e.g., lower education and income). Continued efforts are needed to address digital divide among them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662839/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05612-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05612-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字技术的快速发展从根本上改变了老年人的护理方式。然而,并非所有老年人都有平等的机会获得和使用这些技术,更重要的是,能够从这些技术中受益。我们的目的是探讨(1)老年人数字鸿沟的流行程度和流行趋势,包括数字获取差距、数字使用差距(特别是使用数字技术进行健康交换[电子通信差距])和信息寻求差距(认知差距)的自我效能;(2)与数字鸿沟三个视角相关的社会人口因素;(3)数字鸿沟与自评健康的关系(探索性)。方法:采用加权logistic和线性回归模型对健康信息全国趋势调查(2017-2020)中65岁及以上的成人(N = 5671,加权平均[SD]年龄= 74.26[10.09]岁)进行分析。结果:随着时间的推移,数字接入差距的调整患病率(比值比[OR] = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.94)和电子通信差距(OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82, 0.95)呈显著的线性下降。然而,在2017年至2019年、2018年至2020年期间,认知差距没有明显变化。总体而言,存在数字鸿沟的老年人更有可能受教育程度较低,收入较低,并自认为是西班牙裔人。单变量分析发现,数字鸿沟的三个方面与自我评价不佳的健康状况显著相关。调整协变量(如年龄和性别)的多变量分析发现,获取差距而非电子通勤差距与自评健康相关,认知差距仅与2018年至2020年的自评健康相关,而与2017年至2019年的自评健康无关。结论:数字鸿沟正在减少,但仍然持续存在,并不成比例地影响老年人的自我评估健康,特别是那些处于社会不利地位(例如,教育程度和收入较低)的老年人。需要继续努力消除它们之间的数字鸿沟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital divide as a determinant of health in the U.S. older adults: prevalence, trends, and risk factors.

Background: The rapid development of digital technologies has fundamentally changed the care for older adults. However, not all older adults have equal opportunities to access and use the technologies, more importantly, be able to benefit from the technologies. We aimed to explore (1) the prevalence and the trend in the prevalence of digital divide in older adults, including digital access gap, digital use gap (specifically, using digital technologies for health commutation [e-communication gap]), and self-efficacy in information seeking gap (cognitive gap); (2) sociodemographic factors related to three perspectives of digital divide; and (3) the association between digital divide and self-rated health (exploratory).

Methods: Adults aged 65 years or older (N = 5,671, weighted mean [SD] age = 74.26 [10.09] years) from the Health Information National Trends Surveys (2017-2020) were analyzed using the weighted logistic and linear regression models.

Results: There was a significant linear decrease in the adjusted prevalence of digital access gap (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.94) and the e-communication gap (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82, 0.95) over time. However, there were no significant changes in cognitive gap between 2017 and 2019, and between 2018 and 2020. Overall, older adults with digital divide were more likely to be less educated, have less income, and self-identified as Hispanic people. Univariate analyses found that three perspectives of digital divide were significantly associated with poor self-rated health. Multivariate analyses adjusted for covariates (e.g., age and sex) found that the access gap but not the e-commutation gap was associated with self-rated health and that cognitive gap was only associated with self-rated health between 2018 and 2020 but not between 2017 and 2019.

Conclusions: Digital divide is decreasing but remains persistent and disproportionately affects self-rated health of older adults, particularly those who are socially disadvantaged (e.g., lower education and income). Continued efforts are needed to address digital divide among them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信