中低收入国家HIV- sm中低收入人群自我管理问卷的因素结构

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Tegene Legese Dadi, Girmay Medhin, Mark Spigt
{"title":"中低收入国家HIV- sm中低收入人群自我管理问卷的因素结构","authors":"Tegene Legese Dadi, Girmay Medhin, Mark Spigt","doi":"10.1186/s12981-024-00676-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the need for reliable questionnaires to monitor self-management in chronic disease patients, such tools are lacking in developing countries. This study aims to pilot and assess the construct validity of the HIV-SM LMIC questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The validation of the HIV-SM LMIC questionnaire involved two cross-sectional studies in Ethiopia. The first round, for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), included 261 patients, while the second round, for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), included 300 patients. Data was collected using the Kobo Collect electronic data entry template.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The sample adequacy test showed a good value of 0.82. In the first round, 6 of the 32 items were not loaded, forming three factors in the EFA. Four of these items were dropped, but two (PSMB2 and PSMB12) were retained for their content. In the second round, CFA on the remaining 28 items led to dropping 8 more items due to conceptual overlap, resulting in a 20-item questionnaire. The final items were structured into three dimensions: awareness and well-being (4 items), self-regulation (6 items), and self-management practices (10 items).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study refined the original 32-item HIV-SM LMIC questionnaire to a validated 20-item, three-dimensional tool with an acceptable goodness of fit. The authors recommend further cross-cultural and predictive validation and adaptation for newly diagnosed HIV patients, those with poor treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7503,"journal":{"name":"AIDS Research and Therapy","volume":"21 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factor structure of the HIV-SM LMIC self-management questionnaire for people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries.\",\"authors\":\"Tegene Legese Dadi, Girmay Medhin, Mark Spigt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12981-024-00676-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the need for reliable questionnaires to monitor self-management in chronic disease patients, such tools are lacking in developing countries. This study aims to pilot and assess the construct validity of the HIV-SM LMIC questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The validation of the HIV-SM LMIC questionnaire involved two cross-sectional studies in Ethiopia. The first round, for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), included 261 patients, while the second round, for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), included 300 patients. Data was collected using the Kobo Collect electronic data entry template.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The sample adequacy test showed a good value of 0.82. In the first round, 6 of the 32 items were not loaded, forming three factors in the EFA. Four of these items were dropped, but two (PSMB2 and PSMB12) were retained for their content. In the second round, CFA on the remaining 28 items led to dropping 8 more items due to conceptual overlap, resulting in a 20-item questionnaire. The final items were structured into three dimensions: awareness and well-being (4 items), self-regulation (6 items), and self-management practices (10 items).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study refined the original 32-item HIV-SM LMIC questionnaire to a validated 20-item, three-dimensional tool with an acceptable goodness of fit. The authors recommend further cross-cultural and predictive validation and adaptation for newly diagnosed HIV patients, those with poor treatment outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662549/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-024-00676-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-024-00676-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管需要可靠的问卷来监测慢性病患者的自我管理,但发展中国家缺乏这样的工具。本研究旨在预试及评估HIV-SM LMIC问卷的建构效度。方法:在埃塞俄比亚进行两项横断面研究,验证HIV-SM LMIC问卷。第一轮为探索性因素分析(EFA),纳入261例患者;第二轮为验证性因素分析(CFA),纳入300例患者。使用Kobo Collect电子数据录入模板收集数据。结果:样本充分性检验值为0.82。在第一轮中,32个项目中有6个没有加载,形成了EFA中的三个因素。其中四个条目被删除,但两个条目(PSMB2和PSMB12)的内容被保留。在第二轮中,由于概念重叠,CFA对剩余的28个项目又减少了8个项目,形成了一个20个项目的问卷。最后的项目分为三个维度:意识和幸福感(4个项目),自我调节(6个项目)和自我管理实践(10个项目)。结论:该研究将原来的32项HIV-SM LMIC问卷改进为经过验证的20项三维工具,具有可接受的拟合优度。作者建议对新诊断的HIV患者进行进一步的跨文化和预测性验证和适应,这些患者治疗效果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factor structure of the HIV-SM LMIC self-management questionnaire for people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries.

Introduction: Despite the need for reliable questionnaires to monitor self-management in chronic disease patients, such tools are lacking in developing countries. This study aims to pilot and assess the construct validity of the HIV-SM LMIC questionnaire.

Method: The validation of the HIV-SM LMIC questionnaire involved two cross-sectional studies in Ethiopia. The first round, for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), included 261 patients, while the second round, for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), included 300 patients. Data was collected using the Kobo Collect electronic data entry template.

Result: The sample adequacy test showed a good value of 0.82. In the first round, 6 of the 32 items were not loaded, forming three factors in the EFA. Four of these items were dropped, but two (PSMB2 and PSMB12) were retained for their content. In the second round, CFA on the remaining 28 items led to dropping 8 more items due to conceptual overlap, resulting in a 20-item questionnaire. The final items were structured into three dimensions: awareness and well-being (4 items), self-regulation (6 items), and self-management practices (10 items).

Conclusion: The study refined the original 32-item HIV-SM LMIC questionnaire to a validated 20-item, three-dimensional tool with an acceptable goodness of fit. The authors recommend further cross-cultural and predictive validation and adaptation for newly diagnosed HIV patients, those with poor treatment outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS Research and Therapy
AIDS Research and Therapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Research and Therapy publishes articles on basic science, translational, clinical, social, epidemiological, behavioral and educational sciences articles focused on the treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS, and the search for the cure. The Journal publishes articles on novel and developing treatment strategies for AIDS as well as on the outcomes of established treatment strategies. Original research articles on animal models that form an essential part of the AIDS treatment research are also considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信