基于接纳的过程变量对产后幸福感和痛苦的影响:心理弹性的中介作用。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312454
Alexa Bonacquisti, Emily C Woodworth, Maria Diaz, Victoria A Grunberg
{"title":"基于接纳的过程变量对产后幸福感和痛苦的影响:心理弹性的中介作用。","authors":"Alexa Bonacquisti, Emily C Woodworth, Maria Diaz, Victoria A Grunberg","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0312454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although up to 20% of women experience postpartum depression and/or anxiety, current interventions are limited. Identifying the processes that impact outcomes can inform and enhance interventions. Our study aims to examine: (1) whether acceptance-based process variables (awareness, acceptance, cognitive defusion, psychological flexibility) were associated with postpartum outcomes; and (2) whether psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between treatment engagement and postpartum outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Postpartum women (N = 266) were recruited online using snowball sampling via social media (i.e., Facebook). They completed a cross-sectional survey of validated and reliable quantitative measures assessing their well-being, emotional distress, and acceptance-based processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hierarchical regressions revealed that women with more awareness (β = .13; p = .023), acceptance (β = .17; p = .036), and cognitive defusion (β = -.46; p < .001) reported better well-being. When adding in psychological flexibility, cognitive defusion (β = -.24; p = .031) and psychological flexibility (β = -.33; p = .003) explained variance in well-being. Women with more acceptance (β = -.32; p < .001) and cognitive defusion (β = .52; p < .001) endorsed less emotional distress. When adding in psychological flexibility, acceptance (β = -.28; p < .001), cognitive defusion (β = .40; p < .001), and psychological flexibility (β = .18; p = .047) explained variance in emotional distress. Mediation models revealed that psychological flexibility explained the relationship between mental health treatment and well-being (b = 3.91, SE = 0.66, CI = [2.69, 5.30]) and emotional distress (b = -5.74, SE = 1.08, CI = [-1.26, 3.00]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeting these acceptance-based processes in interventions may help to improve maternal, child, and family outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0312454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptance-based process variables on postpartum well-being and distress: The mediating role of psychological flexibility.\",\"authors\":\"Alexa Bonacquisti, Emily C Woodworth, Maria Diaz, Victoria A Grunberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0312454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although up to 20% of women experience postpartum depression and/or anxiety, current interventions are limited. Identifying the processes that impact outcomes can inform and enhance interventions. Our study aims to examine: (1) whether acceptance-based process variables (awareness, acceptance, cognitive defusion, psychological flexibility) were associated with postpartum outcomes; and (2) whether psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between treatment engagement and postpartum outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Postpartum women (N = 266) were recruited online using snowball sampling via social media (i.e., Facebook). They completed a cross-sectional survey of validated and reliable quantitative measures assessing their well-being, emotional distress, and acceptance-based processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hierarchical regressions revealed that women with more awareness (β = .13; p = .023), acceptance (β = .17; p = .036), and cognitive defusion (β = -.46; p < .001) reported better well-being. When adding in psychological flexibility, cognitive defusion (β = -.24; p = .031) and psychological flexibility (β = -.33; p = .003) explained variance in well-being. Women with more acceptance (β = -.32; p < .001) and cognitive defusion (β = .52; p < .001) endorsed less emotional distress. When adding in psychological flexibility, acceptance (β = -.28; p < .001), cognitive defusion (β = .40; p < .001), and psychological flexibility (β = .18; p = .047) explained variance in emotional distress. Mediation models revealed that psychological flexibility explained the relationship between mental health treatment and well-being (b = 3.91, SE = 0.66, CI = [2.69, 5.30]) and emotional distress (b = -5.74, SE = 1.08, CI = [-1.26, 3.00]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeting these acceptance-based processes in interventions may help to improve maternal, child, and family outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"e0312454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312454\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管高达20%的女性经历过产后抑郁和/或焦虑,但目前的干预措施是有限的。确定影响结果的过程可以为干预提供信息并加强干预。本研究旨在探讨:(1)基于接受的过程变量(意识、接受、认知融合、心理灵活性)是否与产后结局相关;(2)心理灵活性是否在治疗投入与产后结局之间起中介作用。方法:采用滚雪球抽样法,通过社交媒体(即Facebook)在线招募266名产后妇女。他们完成了一项经过验证和可靠的定量测量的横断面调查,评估他们的幸福感、情绪困扰和基于接受的过程。结果:层次回归结果显示,女性的认知程度更高(β = 0.13;P = 0.023),接受度(β = 0.17;P = 0.036),认知融合(β = - 0.46;P < 0.001)报告了更好的幸福感。当增加心理灵活性时,认知融合(β = - 0.24;P = 0.031)和心理灵活性(β = - 0.33;P = .003)解释了幸福感的差异。接受度更高的女性(β = - 0.32;P < .001)和认知融合(β = .52;P < 0.001)表明情绪困扰减少。当增加心理灵活性时,接受度(β = - 0.28;P < .001),认知融合(β = .40;P < .001),心理灵活性(β = .18;P = 0.047)解释了情绪困扰的差异。中介模型显示,心理灵活性解释了心理健康治疗与幸福感(b = 3.91, SE = 0.66, CI =[2.69, 5.30])和情绪困扰(b = -5.74, SE = 1.08, CI =[-1.26, 3.50])之间的关系。结论:在干预中针对这些基于接受的过程可能有助于改善孕产妇、儿童和家庭的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Acceptance-based process variables on postpartum well-being and distress: The mediating role of psychological flexibility.

Acceptance-based process variables on postpartum well-being and distress: The mediating role of psychological flexibility.

Acceptance-based process variables on postpartum well-being and distress: The mediating role of psychological flexibility.

Acceptance-based process variables on postpartum well-being and distress: The mediating role of psychological flexibility.

Objective: Although up to 20% of women experience postpartum depression and/or anxiety, current interventions are limited. Identifying the processes that impact outcomes can inform and enhance interventions. Our study aims to examine: (1) whether acceptance-based process variables (awareness, acceptance, cognitive defusion, psychological flexibility) were associated with postpartum outcomes; and (2) whether psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between treatment engagement and postpartum outcomes.

Method: Postpartum women (N = 266) were recruited online using snowball sampling via social media (i.e., Facebook). They completed a cross-sectional survey of validated and reliable quantitative measures assessing their well-being, emotional distress, and acceptance-based processes.

Results: Hierarchical regressions revealed that women with more awareness (β = .13; p = .023), acceptance (β = .17; p = .036), and cognitive defusion (β = -.46; p < .001) reported better well-being. When adding in psychological flexibility, cognitive defusion (β = -.24; p = .031) and psychological flexibility (β = -.33; p = .003) explained variance in well-being. Women with more acceptance (β = -.32; p < .001) and cognitive defusion (β = .52; p < .001) endorsed less emotional distress. When adding in psychological flexibility, acceptance (β = -.28; p < .001), cognitive defusion (β = .40; p < .001), and psychological flexibility (β = .18; p = .047) explained variance in emotional distress. Mediation models revealed that psychological flexibility explained the relationship between mental health treatment and well-being (b = 3.91, SE = 0.66, CI = [2.69, 5.30]) and emotional distress (b = -5.74, SE = 1.08, CI = [-1.26, 3.00]).

Conclusions: Targeting these acceptance-based processes in interventions may help to improve maternal, child, and family outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信