Alexa Bonacquisti, Emily C Woodworth, Maria Diaz, Victoria A Grunberg
{"title":"基于接纳的过程变量对产后幸福感和痛苦的影响:心理弹性的中介作用。","authors":"Alexa Bonacquisti, Emily C Woodworth, Maria Diaz, Victoria A Grunberg","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0312454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although up to 20% of women experience postpartum depression and/or anxiety, current interventions are limited. Identifying the processes that impact outcomes can inform and enhance interventions. Our study aims to examine: (1) whether acceptance-based process variables (awareness, acceptance, cognitive defusion, psychological flexibility) were associated with postpartum outcomes; and (2) whether psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between treatment engagement and postpartum outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Postpartum women (N = 266) were recruited online using snowball sampling via social media (i.e., Facebook). They completed a cross-sectional survey of validated and reliable quantitative measures assessing their well-being, emotional distress, and acceptance-based processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hierarchical regressions revealed that women with more awareness (β = .13; p = .023), acceptance (β = .17; p = .036), and cognitive defusion (β = -.46; p < .001) reported better well-being. When adding in psychological flexibility, cognitive defusion (β = -.24; p = .031) and psychological flexibility (β = -.33; p = .003) explained variance in well-being. Women with more acceptance (β = -.32; p < .001) and cognitive defusion (β = .52; p < .001) endorsed less emotional distress. When adding in psychological flexibility, acceptance (β = -.28; p < .001), cognitive defusion (β = .40; p < .001), and psychological flexibility (β = .18; p = .047) explained variance in emotional distress. Mediation models revealed that psychological flexibility explained the relationship between mental health treatment and well-being (b = 3.91, SE = 0.66, CI = [2.69, 5.30]) and emotional distress (b = -5.74, SE = 1.08, CI = [-1.26, 3.00]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeting these acceptance-based processes in interventions may help to improve maternal, child, and family outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0312454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptance-based process variables on postpartum well-being and distress: The mediating role of psychological flexibility.\",\"authors\":\"Alexa Bonacquisti, Emily C Woodworth, Maria Diaz, Victoria A Grunberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0312454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although up to 20% of women experience postpartum depression and/or anxiety, current interventions are limited. Identifying the processes that impact outcomes can inform and enhance interventions. Our study aims to examine: (1) whether acceptance-based process variables (awareness, acceptance, cognitive defusion, psychological flexibility) were associated with postpartum outcomes; and (2) whether psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between treatment engagement and postpartum outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Postpartum women (N = 266) were recruited online using snowball sampling via social media (i.e., Facebook). They completed a cross-sectional survey of validated and reliable quantitative measures assessing their well-being, emotional distress, and acceptance-based processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hierarchical regressions revealed that women with more awareness (β = .13; p = .023), acceptance (β = .17; p = .036), and cognitive defusion (β = -.46; p < .001) reported better well-being. When adding in psychological flexibility, cognitive defusion (β = -.24; p = .031) and psychological flexibility (β = -.33; p = .003) explained variance in well-being. Women with more acceptance (β = -.32; p < .001) and cognitive defusion (β = .52; p < .001) endorsed less emotional distress. When adding in psychological flexibility, acceptance (β = -.28; p < .001), cognitive defusion (β = .40; p < .001), and psychological flexibility (β = .18; p = .047) explained variance in emotional distress. Mediation models revealed that psychological flexibility explained the relationship between mental health treatment and well-being (b = 3.91, SE = 0.66, CI = [2.69, 5.30]) and emotional distress (b = -5.74, SE = 1.08, CI = [-1.26, 3.00]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeting these acceptance-based processes in interventions may help to improve maternal, child, and family outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"e0312454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312454\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Acceptance-based process variables on postpartum well-being and distress: The mediating role of psychological flexibility.
Objective: Although up to 20% of women experience postpartum depression and/or anxiety, current interventions are limited. Identifying the processes that impact outcomes can inform and enhance interventions. Our study aims to examine: (1) whether acceptance-based process variables (awareness, acceptance, cognitive defusion, psychological flexibility) were associated with postpartum outcomes; and (2) whether psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between treatment engagement and postpartum outcomes.
Method: Postpartum women (N = 266) were recruited online using snowball sampling via social media (i.e., Facebook). They completed a cross-sectional survey of validated and reliable quantitative measures assessing their well-being, emotional distress, and acceptance-based processes.
Results: Hierarchical regressions revealed that women with more awareness (β = .13; p = .023), acceptance (β = .17; p = .036), and cognitive defusion (β = -.46; p < .001) reported better well-being. When adding in psychological flexibility, cognitive defusion (β = -.24; p = .031) and psychological flexibility (β = -.33; p = .003) explained variance in well-being. Women with more acceptance (β = -.32; p < .001) and cognitive defusion (β = .52; p < .001) endorsed less emotional distress. When adding in psychological flexibility, acceptance (β = -.28; p < .001), cognitive defusion (β = .40; p < .001), and psychological flexibility (β = .18; p = .047) explained variance in emotional distress. Mediation models revealed that psychological flexibility explained the relationship between mental health treatment and well-being (b = 3.91, SE = 0.66, CI = [2.69, 5.30]) and emotional distress (b = -5.74, SE = 1.08, CI = [-1.26, 3.00]).
Conclusions: Targeting these acceptance-based processes in interventions may help to improve maternal, child, and family outcomes.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage