接受 Nuss 修复术儿童的区域麻醉和手术量:多中心回顾

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Dimitra Lotakis, Jack P Vernamonti, Tiffany N Wright, Kyle J Van Arendonk, Peter C Minneci, Charles M Leys, Matthew P Landman, Shawn D St Peter, Rebeccah L Brown, Grace Z Mak, Tsehay B Abebe, K Elizabeth Speck
{"title":"接受 Nuss 修复术儿童的区域麻醉和手术量:多中心回顾","authors":"Dimitra Lotakis, Jack P Vernamonti, Tiffany N Wright, Kyle J Van Arendonk, Peter C Minneci, Charles M Leys, Matthew P Landman, Shawn D St Peter, Rebeccah L Brown, Grace Z Mak, Tsehay B Abebe, K Elizabeth Speck","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regional anesthetic approach and surgical volume have been shown to outcomes in patients undergoing Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. However, their independent relationship is not described. We investigated how regional anesthesia and surgical volume are associated with length of stay (LOS), postoperative opioid use, operating room utilization, and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a 9-center retrospective review of patients ≤21 ys after Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum (2016-2020). High-volume centers and surgeons defined as the upper-quartile for annual procedures. Outcomes were compared with mixed effects linear/logistic regression models with random intercepts by institution as appropriate. A single-center unadjusted analysis was performed of erector spinae catheter (ESC) utilization (due to nonuniform use; high-volume only at 1-center).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>780 patients were included. Significant variation existed in anesthetic approach and volume. Cryoablation was independently associated with shorter LOS (-2.1 d; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.6,-1.7) and lower postoperative opioid utilization (-120 morphine milligram equivalents, 95% CI: -181, -58.1) but increased surgical time (+45 min; 95% CI: 30.3, 59.8). Individual surgeon volume was associated with decreased LOS (-0.3 d; 95% CI: -0.5, -0.01), though high-volume centers had increased complications (odds ratio 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.2). There was no association between anesthetic approach and surgical complications. Within the single center utilizing ESCs (n = 138), a shorter LOS (2 versus 3 d, P < 0.01) was observed compared to those not receiving an ESC (n = 19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analgesic approaches varied significantly across institutions and limited our ability to directly compare cryoablation and ESCs. On multivariate analysis, cryoablation was associated with decreased LOS and postoperative opioid use, irrespective of center and surgeon volume. ESCs were similarly associated with improved outcomes. Rigorous prospective comparison of ESCs and cryoablation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"305 ","pages":"190-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Surgical Volume in Children Undergoing Nuss Repair: A Multicenter Review.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitra Lotakis, Jack P Vernamonti, Tiffany N Wright, Kyle J Van Arendonk, Peter C Minneci, Charles M Leys, Matthew P Landman, Shawn D St Peter, Rebeccah L Brown, Grace Z Mak, Tsehay B Abebe, K Elizabeth Speck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regional anesthetic approach and surgical volume have been shown to outcomes in patients undergoing Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. However, their independent relationship is not described. We investigated how regional anesthesia and surgical volume are associated with length of stay (LOS), postoperative opioid use, operating room utilization, and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a 9-center retrospective review of patients ≤21 ys after Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum (2016-2020). High-volume centers and surgeons defined as the upper-quartile for annual procedures. Outcomes were compared with mixed effects linear/logistic regression models with random intercepts by institution as appropriate. A single-center unadjusted analysis was performed of erector spinae catheter (ESC) utilization (due to nonuniform use; high-volume only at 1-center).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>780 patients were included. Significant variation existed in anesthetic approach and volume. Cryoablation was independently associated with shorter LOS (-2.1 d; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.6,-1.7) and lower postoperative opioid utilization (-120 morphine milligram equivalents, 95% CI: -181, -58.1) but increased surgical time (+45 min; 95% CI: 30.3, 59.8). Individual surgeon volume was associated with decreased LOS (-0.3 d; 95% CI: -0.5, -0.01), though high-volume centers had increased complications (odds ratio 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.2). There was no association between anesthetic approach and surgical complications. Within the single center utilizing ESCs (n = 138), a shorter LOS (2 versus 3 d, P < 0.01) was observed compared to those not receiving an ESC (n = 19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analgesic approaches varied significantly across institutions and limited our ability to directly compare cryoablation and ESCs. On multivariate analysis, cryoablation was associated with decreased LOS and postoperative opioid use, irrespective of center and surgeon volume. ESCs were similarly associated with improved outcomes. Rigorous prospective comparison of ESCs and cryoablation is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"305 \",\"pages\":\"190-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:有研究表明,区域麻醉方法和手术量对接受努斯手术治疗胸大肌的患者的疗效有影响。然而,它们之间的独立关系尚未得到描述。我们研究了区域麻醉和手术量与住院时间(LOS)、术后阿片类药物使用、手术室使用和并发症的关系:这是一项由 9 个中心共同完成的回顾性研究,研究对象为接受努氏手术治疗后年龄小于 21 岁的患者(2016-2020 年)。高容量中心和外科医生被定义为年手术量的上四分位数。采用混合效应线性/逻辑回归模型对结果进行比较,并酌情按机构设置随机截距。对单个中心的直立肌导管(ESC)使用情况进行了未经调整的分析(由于使用不统一;高容量仅在一个中心):结果:共纳入 780 名患者。结果:共纳入 780 例患者,麻醉方法和手术量存在显著差异。低温消融术与较短的LOS(-2.1 d;95% 置信区间[CI]:-2.6,-1.7)和较低的术后阿片类药物使用量(-120吗啡毫克当量,95% CI:-181,-58.1)独立相关,但增加了手术时间(+45 min;95% CI:30.3,59.8)。单个外科医生的数量与住院时间的缩短有关(-0.3 d;95% CI:-0.5,-0.01),但数量多的中心并发症增加(几率比 2.2;95% CI:1.1,4.2)。麻醉方法与手术并发症之间没有关联。在使用ESC的单个中心(n = 138)中,LOS较短(2 d对3 d,P 结论:LOS较短(2 d对3 d,P 结论:LOS较短(2 d对3 d,P 结论:LOS较短(2 d)):不同机构的镇痛方法差异很大,这限制了我们直接比较冷冻消融术和 ESCs 的能力。在多变量分析中,冷冻消融与缩短住院时间和减少术后阿片类药物的使用有关,与中心和外科医生的数量无关。同样,电刀也能改善疗效。有必要对ESC和冷冻消融进行严格的前瞻性比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional Anesthesia and Surgical Volume in Children Undergoing Nuss Repair: A Multicenter Review.

Introduction: Regional anesthetic approach and surgical volume have been shown to outcomes in patients undergoing Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. However, their independent relationship is not described. We investigated how regional anesthesia and surgical volume are associated with length of stay (LOS), postoperative opioid use, operating room utilization, and complications.

Methods: This is a 9-center retrospective review of patients ≤21 ys after Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum (2016-2020). High-volume centers and surgeons defined as the upper-quartile for annual procedures. Outcomes were compared with mixed effects linear/logistic regression models with random intercepts by institution as appropriate. A single-center unadjusted analysis was performed of erector spinae catheter (ESC) utilization (due to nonuniform use; high-volume only at 1-center).

Results: 780 patients were included. Significant variation existed in anesthetic approach and volume. Cryoablation was independently associated with shorter LOS (-2.1 d; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.6,-1.7) and lower postoperative opioid utilization (-120 morphine milligram equivalents, 95% CI: -181, -58.1) but increased surgical time (+45 min; 95% CI: 30.3, 59.8). Individual surgeon volume was associated with decreased LOS (-0.3 d; 95% CI: -0.5, -0.01), though high-volume centers had increased complications (odds ratio 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.2). There was no association between anesthetic approach and surgical complications. Within the single center utilizing ESCs (n = 138), a shorter LOS (2 versus 3 d, P < 0.01) was observed compared to those not receiving an ESC (n = 19).

Conclusions: Analgesic approaches varied significantly across institutions and limited our ability to directly compare cryoablation and ESCs. On multivariate analysis, cryoablation was associated with decreased LOS and postoperative opioid use, irrespective of center and surgeon volume. ESCs were similarly associated with improved outcomes. Rigorous prospective comparison of ESCs and cryoablation is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信