IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shuang Li, Yu Sun, Zhe Liu
{"title":"Learning curve for the perinatal outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction: a single-center, 10-year experience from 2013 to 2023.","authors":"Shuang Li, Yu Sun, Zhe Liu","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the perinatal outcomes of SR using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in MC pregnancies, identified factors affecting these outcomes, and assessed the associated learning curve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included all consecutive MC pregnancies that required RFA from September 2013 to April 2023 at our institution. The perinatal outcomes were compared on the basis of various indications, and binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for cotwin loss. Clinical datas of two periods (2013-2018 vs. 2019-2023) were compared to demonstrate the learning curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 107 cases composed of 40 (37.4 %) twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), 17 (15.9 %) selective intrauterine growth restriction (sFGR), 12 (11.2 %) twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS), 25 (23.4 %) fetal discordant anomalies, 10 (9.3 %) elective fetal reduction (EFR), and three (2.8 %) twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS) cases. The overall live birth rate for cotwins was 83.2 %. The earliest gestational age at delivery was noted in the TTTS group (p=0.021). The procedure-to-delivery interval was the shortest in the TTTS group and the longest in the EFR group (p<0.001). Comparing the 2013-2018 period with the 2019-2023 period, we noted a significant increase in the live birth rate (p=0.01) and the procedure-to-delivery interval (p=0.003), mainly due to improved outcomes in TTTS cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RFA for SR is a safe and effective method for managing complicated MC pregnancies. The type of indication affects postoperative perinatal outcomes, with TTTS showing the most adverse effects. With the increasing number of cases and accumulation of experiences with simultaneous enhancement of technique proficiency, the postprocedural outcomes can be further improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究使用射频消融术(RFA)对 MC 妊娠进行 SR 治疗的围产期结果,确定影响这些结果的因素,并评估相关的学习曲线:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了我院2013年9月至2023年4月期间所有需要RFA的连续MC妊娠。根据不同的适应症对围产期结局进行比较,并进行二元逻辑回归分析以确定胎儿畸形的风险因素。比较了两个时期(2013-2018年与2019-2023年)的临床数据,以展示学习曲线:107例病例中,40例(37.4%)为双胎输血综合征(TTTS),17例(15.9%)为选择性宫内生长受限(sFGR),12例(11.2%)为双胎反向动脉灌注序列(TRAPS),25例(23.4%)为胎儿不协调异常,10例(9.3%)为选择性减胎术(EFR),3例(2.8%)为双胎贫血多血症序列(TAPS)。早产儿的总体活产率为 83.2%。TTTS组的胎龄最早(P=0.021)。从手术到分娩的间隔时间,TTTS 组最短、EFR 组最长(p 结论:针对 SR 的 RFA 是一种安全有效的处理复杂 MC 妊娠的方法。适应症类型会影响术后围产期结局,其中 TTTS 的不良影响最大。随着病例数的增加和经验的积累,以及技术熟练程度的提高,术后结果可得到进一步改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning curve for the perinatal outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction: a single-center, 10-year experience from 2013 to 2023.

Objectives: To investigate the perinatal outcomes of SR using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in MC pregnancies, identified factors affecting these outcomes, and assessed the associated learning curve.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all consecutive MC pregnancies that required RFA from September 2013 to April 2023 at our institution. The perinatal outcomes were compared on the basis of various indications, and binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for cotwin loss. Clinical datas of two periods (2013-2018 vs. 2019-2023) were compared to demonstrate the learning curve.

Results: The 107 cases composed of 40 (37.4 %) twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), 17 (15.9 %) selective intrauterine growth restriction (sFGR), 12 (11.2 %) twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS), 25 (23.4 %) fetal discordant anomalies, 10 (9.3 %) elective fetal reduction (EFR), and three (2.8 %) twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS) cases. The overall live birth rate for cotwins was 83.2 %. The earliest gestational age at delivery was noted in the TTTS group (p=0.021). The procedure-to-delivery interval was the shortest in the TTTS group and the longest in the EFR group (p<0.001). Comparing the 2013-2018 period with the 2019-2023 period, we noted a significant increase in the live birth rate (p=0.01) and the procedure-to-delivery interval (p=0.003), mainly due to improved outcomes in TTTS cases.

Conclusions: RFA for SR is a safe and effective method for managing complicated MC pregnancies. The type of indication affects postoperative perinatal outcomes, with TTTS showing the most adverse effects. With the increasing number of cases and accumulation of experiences with simultaneous enhancement of technique proficiency, the postprocedural outcomes can be further improved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信