Lauren E Schleimer, Emeline Aviki, Hannah L Kalvin, Josephine Magnin, Stefania S Sokolowski, T Peter Kingham, Eileen M O'Reilly, Anna M Varghese, Kevin C Soares, Jeffrey Drebin, Michael I D'Angelica, William R Jarnagin, Mithat Gonen, Bridgette Thom, Alice C Wei
{"title":"财务毒性对胰腺癌治疗依从性和生活质量的影响。","authors":"Lauren E Schleimer, Emeline Aviki, Hannah L Kalvin, Josephine Magnin, Stefania S Sokolowski, T Peter Kingham, Eileen M O'Reilly, Anna M Varghese, Kevin C Soares, Jeffrey Drebin, Michael I D'Angelica, William R Jarnagin, Mithat Gonen, Bridgette Thom, Alice C Wei","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Financial toxicity (FT) is increasingly recognized as a major issue in cancer care. We evaluated the prevalence and risk factors for FT in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and FT associations with treatment adherence and quality of life (QOL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A screening questionnaire based on the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) was implemented at our National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Respondents with pathologic diagnosis of PDAC who completed >50% of prompts between June 2022 and June 2023 were analyzed. COST ≤16 was categorized as FT. Associations between FT and demographic and clinical factors were assessed using logistic regression, and QOL was assessed using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,888 patients with PDAC, 1,162 completed the COST questionnaire, and 1,079 met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of FT was 23% (n = 245); 37% of patients with FT reported medication nonadherence due to cost. Demographic factors and poor performance status were associated with FT. Treatment-naïve patients were more likely to report FT compared with those on induction, adjuvant, or palliative therapy (<i>P</i> = .049). Patients experiencing FT reported worse QOL, with a median score of 5 (IQR, 4-7) versus 8 (IQR, 6-9) without FT. This relationship persisted after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors; the effect size of FT (β = -1.5; 95% CI, -1.1 to -1.9) was nearly double that of poor performance status (β = -.8; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FT affected nearly one in four patients with PDAC at a high-volume cancer center and was associated with worse QOL and medication nonadherence. Universal screening and interventions to reduce FT are warranted. Clinical trials investigating QOL as an end point must account for potential confounding due to FT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"1325-1334"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Financial Toxicity on Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life in Pancreatic Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren E Schleimer, Emeline Aviki, Hannah L Kalvin, Josephine Magnin, Stefania S Sokolowski, T Peter Kingham, Eileen M O'Reilly, Anna M Varghese, Kevin C Soares, Jeffrey Drebin, Michael I D'Angelica, William R Jarnagin, Mithat Gonen, Bridgette Thom, Alice C Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP-24-00528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Financial toxicity (FT) is increasingly recognized as a major issue in cancer care. We evaluated the prevalence and risk factors for FT in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and FT associations with treatment adherence and quality of life (QOL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A screening questionnaire based on the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) was implemented at our National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Respondents with pathologic diagnosis of PDAC who completed >50% of prompts between June 2022 and June 2023 were analyzed. COST ≤16 was categorized as FT. Associations between FT and demographic and clinical factors were assessed using logistic regression, and QOL was assessed using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,888 patients with PDAC, 1,162 completed the COST questionnaire, and 1,079 met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of FT was 23% (n = 245); 37% of patients with FT reported medication nonadherence due to cost. Demographic factors and poor performance status were associated with FT. Treatment-naïve patients were more likely to report FT compared with those on induction, adjuvant, or palliative therapy (<i>P</i> = .049). Patients experiencing FT reported worse QOL, with a median score of 5 (IQR, 4-7) versus 8 (IQR, 6-9) without FT. This relationship persisted after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors; the effect size of FT (β = -1.5; 95% CI, -1.1 to -1.9) was nearly double that of poor performance status (β = -.8; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FT affected nearly one in four patients with PDAC at a high-volume cancer center and was associated with worse QOL and medication nonadherence. Universal screening and interventions to reduce FT are warranted. Clinical trials investigating QOL as an end point must account for potential confounding due to FT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1325-1334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00528\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:经济毒性(FT)日益被认为是癌症治疗中的一个主要问题。我们评估了胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者财务毒性的发生率和风险因素,以及财务毒性与治疗依从性和生活质量(QOL)的关系:在美国国立癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心实施了基于财务毒性综合评分(COST)的筛查问卷。在 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月期间,对病理诊断为 PDAC 且完成>50%提示的受访者进行了分析。COST≤16被归类为FT。FT与人口统计学和临床因素之间的关系采用逻辑回归法进行评估,QOL采用线性回归法进行评估:在1888名PDAC患者中,1162人完成了COST问卷调查,1079人符合纳入标准。FT患病率为23%(n=245);37%的FT患者表示因费用问题而不坚持用药。人口统计学因素和不良表现状态与 FT 相关。与正在接受诱导治疗、辅助治疗或姑息治疗的患者相比,治疗无效的患者更有可能报告FT(P = .049)。出现 FT 的患者的 QOL 较差,中位数为 5(IQR,4-7)分,而未出现 FT 的患者为 8(IQR,6-9)分。在调整了人口统计学和临床因素后,这种关系依然存在;FT的影响大小(β = -1.5; 95% CI, -1.1 to -1.9)几乎是不良表现状态(β = -.8; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.4)的两倍:结论:在一个大样本癌症中心,每四名PDAC患者中就有近一人受到FT的影响,而且FT与患者的生活质量下降和不遵医嘱用药有关。有必要进行普遍筛查并采取干预措施以减少FT。将 QOL 作为终点的临床试验必须考虑到 FT 可能造成的混杂因素。
Impact of Financial Toxicity on Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life in Pancreatic Cancer.
Purpose: Financial toxicity (FT) is increasingly recognized as a major issue in cancer care. We evaluated the prevalence and risk factors for FT in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and FT associations with treatment adherence and quality of life (QOL).
Methods: A screening questionnaire based on the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) was implemented at our National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Respondents with pathologic diagnosis of PDAC who completed >50% of prompts between June 2022 and June 2023 were analyzed. COST ≤16 was categorized as FT. Associations between FT and demographic and clinical factors were assessed using logistic regression, and QOL was assessed using linear regression.
Results: Of the 1,888 patients with PDAC, 1,162 completed the COST questionnaire, and 1,079 met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of FT was 23% (n = 245); 37% of patients with FT reported medication nonadherence due to cost. Demographic factors and poor performance status were associated with FT. Treatment-naïve patients were more likely to report FT compared with those on induction, adjuvant, or palliative therapy (P = .049). Patients experiencing FT reported worse QOL, with a median score of 5 (IQR, 4-7) versus 8 (IQR, 6-9) without FT. This relationship persisted after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors; the effect size of FT (β = -1.5; 95% CI, -1.1 to -1.9) was nearly double that of poor performance status (β = -.8; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.4).
Conclusion: FT affected nearly one in four patients with PDAC at a high-volume cancer center and was associated with worse QOL and medication nonadherence. Universal screening and interventions to reduce FT are warranted. Clinical trials investigating QOL as an end point must account for potential confounding due to FT.