改变肉类抗性:关于消费者对替代蛋白质过渡的抗性的系统文献综述。

IF 10.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
M C Onwezen, G Nassar, J A Bouma
{"title":"改变肉类抗性:关于消费者对替代蛋白质过渡的抗性的系统文献综述。","authors":"M C Onwezen, G Nassar, J A Bouma","doi":"10.1146/annurev-food-111523-121744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consumer resistance significantly impedes the transition from animal-derived proteins to alternative protein sources through a dual mechanism: consumer reluctance to change entrenched meat-eating habits and hesitation among policymakers, marketers, and practitioners due to anticipated resistance. The concept of resistance is intricate and viewed diversely across research disciplines. We conducted an extensive systematic literature review supplemented by an artificial intelligence-based approach. We evaluated 3,387 studies to identify 51 key papers. The results reveal that resistance is under-researched. Resistance to plant-based diets is associated with practical barriers, whereas resistance to reducing meat consumption is tied more to moral and social aspects. Resistance predominantly manifests among unmotivated meat lovers with strong meat-eating habits. On a positive note, resistance reflects consumer concerns, tends to diminish over time, is overrated, and is specifically linked to specific consumer groups. Thus, addressing resistance is vital, as it facilitates the transition to a more sustainable and healthy food supply that relies less on animal proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":8187,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of food science and technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change Meat Resistance: Systematic Literature Review on Consumer Resistance to the Alternative Protein Transition.\",\"authors\":\"M C Onwezen, G Nassar, J A Bouma\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-food-111523-121744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Consumer resistance significantly impedes the transition from animal-derived proteins to alternative protein sources through a dual mechanism: consumer reluctance to change entrenched meat-eating habits and hesitation among policymakers, marketers, and practitioners due to anticipated resistance. The concept of resistance is intricate and viewed diversely across research disciplines. We conducted an extensive systematic literature review supplemented by an artificial intelligence-based approach. We evaluated 3,387 studies to identify 51 key papers. The results reveal that resistance is under-researched. Resistance to plant-based diets is associated with practical barriers, whereas resistance to reducing meat consumption is tied more to moral and social aspects. Resistance predominantly manifests among unmotivated meat lovers with strong meat-eating habits. On a positive note, resistance reflects consumer concerns, tends to diminish over time, is overrated, and is specifically linked to specific consumer groups. Thus, addressing resistance is vital, as it facilitates the transition to a more sustainable and healthy food supply that relies less on animal proteins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual review of food science and technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual review of food science and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-111523-121744\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-111523-121744","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

消费者的抵制通过双重机制极大地阻碍了从动物源性蛋白质向替代蛋白质来源的过渡:消费者不愿改变根深蒂固的吃肉习惯,政策制定者、营销人员和从业者由于预期的抵制而犹豫不决。耐药性的概念是复杂的,在不同的研究学科中有不同的观点。我们进行了广泛的系统文献综述,并辅以基于人工智能的方法。我们评估了3387项研究,确定了51篇关键论文。结果表明,对耐药性的研究不足。对植物性饮食的抵制与实际障碍有关,而对减少肉类消费的抵制更多地与道德和社会方面有关。抗药性主要表现在没有动力的吃肉爱好者中,他们有强烈的吃肉习惯。从积极的方面来看,阻力反映了消费者的担忧,往往随着时间的推移而减少,被高估了,并且与特定的消费者群体特别相关。因此,解决耐药性问题至关重要,因为它有助于向更可持续和更健康的食品供应过渡,减少对动物蛋白的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Change Meat Resistance: Systematic Literature Review on Consumer Resistance to the Alternative Protein Transition.

Consumer resistance significantly impedes the transition from animal-derived proteins to alternative protein sources through a dual mechanism: consumer reluctance to change entrenched meat-eating habits and hesitation among policymakers, marketers, and practitioners due to anticipated resistance. The concept of resistance is intricate and viewed diversely across research disciplines. We conducted an extensive systematic literature review supplemented by an artificial intelligence-based approach. We evaluated 3,387 studies to identify 51 key papers. The results reveal that resistance is under-researched. Resistance to plant-based diets is associated with practical barriers, whereas resistance to reducing meat consumption is tied more to moral and social aspects. Resistance predominantly manifests among unmotivated meat lovers with strong meat-eating habits. On a positive note, resistance reflects consumer concerns, tends to diminish over time, is overrated, and is specifically linked to specific consumer groups. Thus, addressing resistance is vital, as it facilitates the transition to a more sustainable and healthy food supply that relies less on animal proteins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 2010, the Annual Review of Food Science and Technology has been a key source for current developments in the multidisciplinary field. The covered topics span food microbiology, food-borne pathogens, and fermentation; food engineering, chemistry, biochemistry, rheology, and sensory properties; novel ingredients and nutrigenomics; emerging technologies in food processing and preservation; and applications of biotechnology and nanomaterials in food systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信