IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Sama Elkholy, Mostafa F. Shaaban, Abdelfatah Ali, Tarnim Nos, Ahmed S. A. Awad
{"title":"Optimal Allocation of Depots for Electric Bus Charging: Cost Minimization and Power System Impact Mitigation Using Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming","authors":"Sama Elkholy,&nbsp;Mostafa F. Shaaban,&nbsp;Abdelfatah Ali,&nbsp;Tarnim Nos,&nbsp;Ahmed S. A. Awad","doi":"10.1002/ese3.1955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper proposes a novel approach for the optimal allocation of a depot for electric buses (EBs) charging in a specific transit service, considering the impact on the power system. The main objective is to minimize the total cost, achieved by minimizing the cost of the new cables connecting the depot station to the distribution system and the upgrade cost of existing lines to meet the additional loads. The outcomes are the optimal location of the depot, the optimal electric node bus in the distribution system to supply it, and the required system upgrades. The optimization problem is formulated as a Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming (MINLP) model and solved using the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS). The methodology is tested on the H16 EB service line in Barcelona, Spain, and a typical electrical distribution system. Three case studies are presented in this paper. In the first case, the impact of a single service on the distribution network is analyzed, and in the second case, three H16 EB services are assumed to serve the network. The third case handles a multi-route, multi-terminal bus service to allocate and supply a depot capable of accommodating all the routes. This case will also include sensitivity analysis to test the robustness and reliability of the model. Results show that for a single H16 EB service, no line upgrades were needed, and the total cost per phase was $120,000. For three H16 EB services, three lines required upgrades, and the total cost per phase increased to $718,000. In the third case, the sensitivity analysis revealed that higher demand factors lead to increased costs due to more update requirements and voltage deviations. The results demonstrate that the minimum distance between the depot and node is not always the optimal or feasible solution that would prevent the depot load installation at a weak spot and meet the power flow constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"12 12","pages":"5466-5479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.1955","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1955","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到对电力系统的影响,本文提出了一种新颖的方法,用于优化特定公交服务中电动公交车(EB)充电库的分配。其主要目标是最大限度地降低总成本,具体做法是最大限度地降低连接充电站和配电系统的新电缆成本以及现有线路的升级成本,以满足额外负载的需要。结果是车厂的最佳位置、配电系统中为其供电的最佳电力节点母线以及所需的系统升级。优化问题以混合整数非线性编程 (MINLP) 模型的形式提出,并使用通用代数建模系统 (GAMS) 进行求解。该方法在西班牙巴塞罗那的 H16 EB 服务线路和典型的配电系统中进行了测试。本文介绍了三个案例研究。在第一个案例中,分析了单一服务对配电网络的影响;在第二个案例中,假设有三个 H16 EB 服务为配电网络服务。第三种情况是处理多线路、多终点站的巴士服务,以分配和供应一个能够容纳所有线路的车厂。该案例还包括敏感性分析,以测试模型的稳健性和可靠性。结果表明,对于单条 H16 EB 线路服务,无需进行线路升级,每个阶段的总成本为 120,000 美元。对于三项 H16 转播服务,三条线路需要升级,每个阶段的总成本增加到 71.8 万美元。在第三种情况下,敏感性分析表明,由于更多的更新要求和电压偏差,更高的需求系数会导致成本增加。结果表明,车厂与节点之间的最小距离并不总是最佳或可行的解决方案,既能防止在薄弱点安装车厂负荷,又能满足电力流约束条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimal Allocation of Depots for Electric Bus Charging: Cost Minimization and Power System Impact Mitigation Using Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming

Optimal Allocation of Depots for Electric Bus Charging: Cost Minimization and Power System Impact Mitigation Using Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming

This paper proposes a novel approach for the optimal allocation of a depot for electric buses (EBs) charging in a specific transit service, considering the impact on the power system. The main objective is to minimize the total cost, achieved by minimizing the cost of the new cables connecting the depot station to the distribution system and the upgrade cost of existing lines to meet the additional loads. The outcomes are the optimal location of the depot, the optimal electric node bus in the distribution system to supply it, and the required system upgrades. The optimization problem is formulated as a Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming (MINLP) model and solved using the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS). The methodology is tested on the H16 EB service line in Barcelona, Spain, and a typical electrical distribution system. Three case studies are presented in this paper. In the first case, the impact of a single service on the distribution network is analyzed, and in the second case, three H16 EB services are assumed to serve the network. The third case handles a multi-route, multi-terminal bus service to allocate and supply a depot capable of accommodating all the routes. This case will also include sensitivity analysis to test the robustness and reliability of the model. Results show that for a single H16 EB service, no line upgrades were needed, and the total cost per phase was $120,000. For three H16 EB services, three lines required upgrades, and the total cost per phase increased to $718,000. In the third case, the sensitivity analysis revealed that higher demand factors lead to increased costs due to more update requirements and voltage deviations. The results demonstrate that the minimum distance between the depot and node is not always the optimal or feasible solution that would prevent the depot load installation at a weak spot and meet the power flow constraints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信