Jenny W. Sun , Laura E. Dodge , Eric J. Kim , Li Zhou , Susan Mather , Henry Goebe , Nicola Charpentier , Kirsten Nespithal , Kofi Asomaning , Florence T. Wang
{"title":"在美国,欧米克隆xbb适应型BNT162b2 COVID-19疫苗接种后不良事件的风险","authors":"Jenny W. Sun , Laura E. Dodge , Eric J. Kim , Li Zhou , Susan Mather , Henry Goebe , Nicola Charpentier , Kirsten Nespithal , Kofi Asomaning , Florence T. Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited data exists regarding the safety of the COVID-19 2023–2024 vaccine formulations and whether the safety profiles differ from the original formulations. We evaluated the association between the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine and the risk of 20 pre-specified adverse events of special interest (AESIs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified commercially-insured individuals in the US age ≥ 6 months who received the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine between September 11, 2023 and January 15, 2024 within the Optum pre-adjudicated database. The self-controlled risk interval design was used to compare the incidence of 20 pre-specified AESIs during a risk period following vaccination to a control period. Relative incidence and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using exact conditional Poisson regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis included 113,459 individuals who received the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine (median [interquartile range] age: 47.1 [33.0–59.1] years). Relative incidence was calculated when ≥1 event occurred in either the risk or control period. For these 10 AESIs, there was no significant association between receipt of the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine and the incidence of any of these AESIs. Point estimates were higher in the risk period compared to the control period for ischemic stroke (relative incidence: 1.52; 95 % CI: 0.44–5.94), myocarditis/pericarditis (relative incidence: 1.50; 95 % CI: 0.22–12.61), immune-mediated myositis (relative incidence: 1.44; 95 % CI: 0.83–2.52), herpes zoster (relative incidence: 1.24; 95 % CI: 0.69–2.28), and non-febrile convulsions/seizures (relative incidence: 1.22; 95 % CI: 0.86–1.73). These estimates were not statistically significant, though most were based on few events. Results were generally similar in subgroup analyses of individuals administered a concomitant seasonal influenza vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was no increased risk of 20 pre-specified AESIs following receipt of the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine among US commercially insured individuals aged ≥6 months. Findings are consistent with the current evidence on the safety of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines.</div><div>Public registration: EUPAS108135.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 126629"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of adverse events after Omicron XBB-adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Jenny W. Sun , Laura E. Dodge , Eric J. Kim , Li Zhou , Susan Mather , Henry Goebe , Nicola Charpentier , Kirsten Nespithal , Kofi Asomaning , Florence T. Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited data exists regarding the safety of the COVID-19 2023–2024 vaccine formulations and whether the safety profiles differ from the original formulations. We evaluated the association between the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine and the risk of 20 pre-specified adverse events of special interest (AESIs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified commercially-insured individuals in the US age ≥ 6 months who received the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine between September 11, 2023 and January 15, 2024 within the Optum pre-adjudicated database. The self-controlled risk interval design was used to compare the incidence of 20 pre-specified AESIs during a risk period following vaccination to a control period. Relative incidence and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using exact conditional Poisson regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis included 113,459 individuals who received the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine (median [interquartile range] age: 47.1 [33.0–59.1] years). Relative incidence was calculated when ≥1 event occurred in either the risk or control period. For these 10 AESIs, there was no significant association between receipt of the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine and the incidence of any of these AESIs. Point estimates were higher in the risk period compared to the control period for ischemic stroke (relative incidence: 1.52; 95 % CI: 0.44–5.94), myocarditis/pericarditis (relative incidence: 1.50; 95 % CI: 0.22–12.61), immune-mediated myositis (relative incidence: 1.44; 95 % CI: 0.83–2.52), herpes zoster (relative incidence: 1.24; 95 % CI: 0.69–2.28), and non-febrile convulsions/seizures (relative incidence: 1.22; 95 % CI: 0.86–1.73). These estimates were not statistically significant, though most were based on few events. Results were generally similar in subgroup analyses of individuals administered a concomitant seasonal influenza vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was no increased risk of 20 pre-specified AESIs following receipt of the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine among US commercially insured individuals aged ≥6 months. Findings are consistent with the current evidence on the safety of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines.</div><div>Public registration: EUPAS108135.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24013112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24013112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk of adverse events after Omicron XBB-adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in the United States
Background
Limited data exists regarding the safety of the COVID-19 2023–2024 vaccine formulations and whether the safety profiles differ from the original formulations. We evaluated the association between the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine and the risk of 20 pre-specified adverse events of special interest (AESIs).
Methods
We identified commercially-insured individuals in the US age ≥ 6 months who received the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine between September 11, 2023 and January 15, 2024 within the Optum pre-adjudicated database. The self-controlled risk interval design was used to compare the incidence of 20 pre-specified AESIs during a risk period following vaccination to a control period. Relative incidence and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using exact conditional Poisson regression.
Results
The analysis included 113,459 individuals who received the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine (median [interquartile range] age: 47.1 [33.0–59.1] years). Relative incidence was calculated when ≥1 event occurred in either the risk or control period. For these 10 AESIs, there was no significant association between receipt of the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine and the incidence of any of these AESIs. Point estimates were higher in the risk period compared to the control period for ischemic stroke (relative incidence: 1.52; 95 % CI: 0.44–5.94), myocarditis/pericarditis (relative incidence: 1.50; 95 % CI: 0.22–12.61), immune-mediated myositis (relative incidence: 1.44; 95 % CI: 0.83–2.52), herpes zoster (relative incidence: 1.24; 95 % CI: 0.69–2.28), and non-febrile convulsions/seizures (relative incidence: 1.22; 95 % CI: 0.86–1.73). These estimates were not statistically significant, though most were based on few events. Results were generally similar in subgroup analyses of individuals administered a concomitant seasonal influenza vaccine.
Conclusions
There was no increased risk of 20 pre-specified AESIs following receipt of the BNT162b2 XBB COVID-19 vaccine among US commercially insured individuals aged ≥6 months. Findings are consistent with the current evidence on the safety of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines.
期刊介绍:
Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.