复合树脂基材料增材制造、减材制造和常规制造的表面特性和细菌粘附的体外比较。

Sevde Gül Batmaz, Zehra Süsgün Yildirim, Zeynep Ceren Çelik, Dilajla Ardiç, Cihan Küden
{"title":"复合树脂基材料增材制造、减材制造和常规制造的表面特性和细菌粘附的体外比较。","authors":"Sevde Gül Batmaz, Zehra Süsgün Yildirim, Zeynep Ceren Çelik, Dilajla Ardiç, Cihan Küden","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), surface free energy (SFE), and bacterial adhesion of resin-based materials used in additive, subtractive, and conventional manufacturing techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study involved four groups of 23 specimens: Indirect conventional resin composite (ICRC), subtractively manufactured resin composite (SMRC), additively manufactured resin composite (AMRC), and soda-lime-silica glass (SLSG). One specimen per group was analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) before polishing. Following the polishing procedure, SR, CA, and SFE were measured. The sterilized specimens were divided into two subgroups for Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus mitis adhesion. One randomly selected specimen from each group was also reserved for visualization of bacterial adhesion using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and bacterial adhesion was quantified in the remaining specimens (n=10). Data for SR, CA, SFE, and bacterial adhesion were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc tests, and Pearson correlation (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the resin groups, the ICRC group had the lowest SR values (P < .001). The higher CA was observed in the SMRC group than AMRC (P = .016). AMRC displayed significantly lower S. mitis adhesion compared to ICRC and SMRC (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). A positive correlation was found between SR and S.mutans adhesion (R = .455, P < .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resin materials designed for different manufacturing techniques exhibited diverse surface characteristics. Nevertheless, the 3D printable permanent resin demonstrated comparable S. mutans adhesion to that of ICRC and SMRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Comparison of Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion in Composite Resin-Based Materials for Additive, Subtractive, and Conventional Manufacturing.\",\"authors\":\"Sevde Gül Batmaz, Zehra Süsgün Yildirim, Zeynep Ceren Çelik, Dilajla Ardiç, Cihan Küden\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.9212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), surface free energy (SFE), and bacterial adhesion of resin-based materials used in additive, subtractive, and conventional manufacturing techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study involved four groups of 23 specimens: Indirect conventional resin composite (ICRC), subtractively manufactured resin composite (SMRC), additively manufactured resin composite (AMRC), and soda-lime-silica glass (SLSG). One specimen per group was analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) before polishing. Following the polishing procedure, SR, CA, and SFE were measured. The sterilized specimens were divided into two subgroups for Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus mitis adhesion. One randomly selected specimen from each group was also reserved for visualization of bacterial adhesion using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and bacterial adhesion was quantified in the remaining specimens (n=10). Data for SR, CA, SFE, and bacterial adhesion were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc tests, and Pearson correlation (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the resin groups, the ICRC group had the lowest SR values (P < .001). The higher CA was observed in the SMRC group than AMRC (P = .016). AMRC displayed significantly lower S. mitis adhesion compared to ICRC and SMRC (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). A positive correlation was found between SR and S.mutans adhesion (R = .455, P < .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resin materials designed for different manufacturing techniques exhibited diverse surface characteristics. Nevertheless, the 3D printable permanent resin demonstrated comparable S. mutans adhesion to that of ICRC and SMRC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较增材、减材和传统制造技术中树脂基材料的表面粗糙度(SR)、接触角(CA)、表面自由能(SFE)和细菌粘附性。材料与方法:采用间接常规树脂复合材料(ICRC)、减法合成树脂复合材料(SMRC)、增材合成树脂复合材料(AMRC)和钠石灰硅玻璃(SLSG)四组共23个样品进行研究。每组一个样品在抛光前进行能量色散x射线光谱分析。在抛光过程中,测量了SR、CA和SFE。将灭菌后的标本分为变形链球菌和炎链球菌粘附亚组。每组随机选择1个标本,用扫描电镜(SEM)观察细菌粘附情况,剩余标本(n=10)对细菌粘附进行定量分析。SR、CA、SFE和细菌粘附数据采用单因素方差分析、Tukey事后检验和Pearson相关分析(α = 0.05)。结果:树脂组中ICRC组的SR值最低(P < 0.001)。SMRC组CA高于AMRC组(P = 0.016)。与ICRC和SMRC相比,AMRC对S. mitis的粘附性显著降低(P < 0.001和P = 0.003)。SR与变形链球菌黏附呈显著正相关(R = .455, P < .003)。结论:不同工艺设计的树脂材料具有不同的表面特性。然而,3D打印的永久树脂显示出与ICRC和SMRC相当的变形链球菌粘附性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Comparison of Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion in Composite Resin-Based Materials for Additive, Subtractive, and Conventional Manufacturing.

Purpose: This study aims to compare the surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), surface free energy (SFE), and bacterial adhesion of resin-based materials used in additive, subtractive, and conventional manufacturing techniques.

Materials and methods: This study involved four groups of 23 specimens: Indirect conventional resin composite (ICRC), subtractively manufactured resin composite (SMRC), additively manufactured resin composite (AMRC), and soda-lime-silica glass (SLSG). One specimen per group was analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) before polishing. Following the polishing procedure, SR, CA, and SFE were measured. The sterilized specimens were divided into two subgroups for Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus mitis adhesion. One randomly selected specimen from each group was also reserved for visualization of bacterial adhesion using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and bacterial adhesion was quantified in the remaining specimens (n=10). Data for SR, CA, SFE, and bacterial adhesion were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc tests, and Pearson correlation (α = .05).

Results: Among the resin groups, the ICRC group had the lowest SR values (P < .001). The higher CA was observed in the SMRC group than AMRC (P = .016). AMRC displayed significantly lower S. mitis adhesion compared to ICRC and SMRC (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). A positive correlation was found between SR and S.mutans adhesion (R = .455, P < .003).

Conclusion: Resin materials designed for different manufacturing techniques exhibited diverse surface characteristics. Nevertheless, the 3D printable permanent resin demonstrated comparable S. mutans adhesion to that of ICRC and SMRC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信