通过临床和光学视网膜断层扫描测量疑似青光眼儿童患者的可疑视盘的杯盘比。

IF 0.9
Frontiers in ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fopht.2024.1479286
Caroline Maria Zimmermann, Nur Cardakli, Courtney Lynn Kraus
{"title":"通过临床和光学视网膜断层扫描测量疑似青光眼儿童患者的可疑视盘的杯盘比。","authors":"Caroline Maria Zimmermann, Nur Cardakli, Courtney Lynn Kraus","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2024.1479286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Compare cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) measured by clinical assessment and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in pediatric eyes being monitored as glaucoma suspects for suspicious optic disc appearance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional study following 221 eyes from 122 unique pediatric glaucoma suspects being monitored due to increased or asymmetric appearance of CDR. Ophthalmologic findings, including visual acuity, intraocular pressure, CDR measured by clinical assessment, average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and average CDR measured by OCT, were recorded for each participant's initial and final examinations. CDRs measured clinically and by OCT were compared at both initial and final presentations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average age at presentation was 9.0 years old (95% CI: 8.0-9.9), and mean length of follow-up was 5.0 years (95% CI: 5.4-4.5). At initial presentation, 53 eyes had CDRs recorded by both clinical assessment and OCT, and at final presentation, 93 eyes had CDRs measured by both modalities. CDR measured by OCT was significantly larger than CDR measured clinically on initial and final presentation (p=0.002, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measurements of CDR by clinician assessment were significantly smaller than measurements obtained via OCT imaging. However, the average difference between CDR measured clinically and by OCT was <0.1. Thus, OCT may be a suitable way to measure CDR in pediatric glaucoma suspects, especially when clinical exam proves difficult. Further research is needed to assess CDR in glaucoma suspects using OCT longitudinally and in the context of other optic disc measurements, such as disc area.</p>","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1479286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cup-to-disc ratio measured clinically and via OCT in pediatric patients being monitored as glaucoma suspects for suspicious optic discs.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Maria Zimmermann, Nur Cardakli, Courtney Lynn Kraus\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fopht.2024.1479286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Compare cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) measured by clinical assessment and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in pediatric eyes being monitored as glaucoma suspects for suspicious optic disc appearance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional study following 221 eyes from 122 unique pediatric glaucoma suspects being monitored due to increased or asymmetric appearance of CDR. Ophthalmologic findings, including visual acuity, intraocular pressure, CDR measured by clinical assessment, average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and average CDR measured by OCT, were recorded for each participant's initial and final examinations. CDRs measured clinically and by OCT were compared at both initial and final presentations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average age at presentation was 9.0 years old (95% CI: 8.0-9.9), and mean length of follow-up was 5.0 years (95% CI: 5.4-4.5). At initial presentation, 53 eyes had CDRs recorded by both clinical assessment and OCT, and at final presentation, 93 eyes had CDRs measured by both modalities. CDR measured by OCT was significantly larger than CDR measured clinically on initial and final presentation (p=0.002, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measurements of CDR by clinician assessment were significantly smaller than measurements obtained via OCT imaging. However, the average difference between CDR measured clinically and by OCT was <0.1. Thus, OCT may be a suitable way to measure CDR in pediatric glaucoma suspects, especially when clinical exam proves difficult. Further research is needed to assess CDR in glaucoma suspects using OCT longitudinally and in the context of other optic disc measurements, such as disc area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1479286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656306/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2024.1479286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2024.1479286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较临床评估测量的杯盘比(CDR)与光学相干断层扫描(OCT)对青光眼疑似视盘表现的监测。设计:回顾性横断面研究。方法:对122例儿童青光眼疑似患者的221只眼进行制度性研究,对CDR增加或不对称外观进行监测。记录每位参与者初始和期末检查的眼科检查结果,包括视力、眼压、临床评估测得的CDR、视网膜神经纤维层平均厚度和OCT测得的平均CDR。临床和OCT测量的cdr在初始和最终表现时进行比较。结果:患者就诊时平均年龄9.0岁(95% CI: 8.0-9.9),平均随访时间5.0年(95% CI: 5.4-4.5)。在初次就诊时,53只眼睛的临床评估和OCT均记录了cdr,在最终就诊时,93只眼睛的cdr均通过两种方式测量。OCT测量的CDR在初始和最终表现时明显大于临床测量的CDR (p=0.002, p)。结论:临床医生评估的CDR测量值明显小于OCT成像测量值。然而,临床测量的CDR与OCT之间的平均差异为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cup-to-disc ratio measured clinically and via OCT in pediatric patients being monitored as glaucoma suspects for suspicious optic discs.

Purpose: Compare cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) measured by clinical assessment and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in pediatric eyes being monitored as glaucoma suspects for suspicious optic disc appearance.

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Methods: An institutional study following 221 eyes from 122 unique pediatric glaucoma suspects being monitored due to increased or asymmetric appearance of CDR. Ophthalmologic findings, including visual acuity, intraocular pressure, CDR measured by clinical assessment, average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and average CDR measured by OCT, were recorded for each participant's initial and final examinations. CDRs measured clinically and by OCT were compared at both initial and final presentations.

Results: Average age at presentation was 9.0 years old (95% CI: 8.0-9.9), and mean length of follow-up was 5.0 years (95% CI: 5.4-4.5). At initial presentation, 53 eyes had CDRs recorded by both clinical assessment and OCT, and at final presentation, 93 eyes had CDRs measured by both modalities. CDR measured by OCT was significantly larger than CDR measured clinically on initial and final presentation (p=0.002, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Measurements of CDR by clinician assessment were significantly smaller than measurements obtained via OCT imaging. However, the average difference between CDR measured clinically and by OCT was <0.1. Thus, OCT may be a suitable way to measure CDR in pediatric glaucoma suspects, especially when clinical exam proves difficult. Further research is needed to assess CDR in glaucoma suspects using OCT longitudinally and in the context of other optic disc measurements, such as disc area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信