使用智能手机内置麦克风与数字听诊器进行肺部听诊:早期可行性对比研究。

IF 1 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Beatriz Baptista, Inês Pais-Cunha, Rita Amaral, Pedro Vieira-Marques, José Valente, Rute Almeida, Cristina Costa-Santos, Inês Azevedo, João A Fonseca, Manuel Ferreira-Magalhães, Cristina Jácome
{"title":"使用智能手机内置麦克风与数字听诊器进行肺部听诊:早期可行性对比研究。","authors":"Beatriz Baptista, Inês Pais-Cunha, Rita Amaral, Pedro Vieira-Marques, José Valente, Rute Almeida, Cristina Costa-Santos, Inês Azevedo, João A Fonseca, Manuel Ferreira-Magalhães, Cristina Jácome","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07657-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung auscultation using a smartphone built-in microphone is promising for home monitoring of pediatric respiratory diseases. Our aim was to compare respiratory sounds recorded by a smartphone and a digital stethoscope by assessing the proportion of quality recordings and adventitious sounds detected by each device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative early feasibility study with children from a public school in Northern Portugal was conducted. Lung auscultation was performed at 7 locations (trachea, anterior superior, posterior superior, and posterior inferior regions of both hemithoraces). Two researchers recorded lung auscultation simultaneously with a smartphone and a digital stethoscope, and independently classified recordings regarding their quality (at least one respiratory cycle audible with minimal artefacts) and presence of adventitious sounds. A third researcher resolved the disagreements. Proportions of sounds with quality and with adventitious sounds were compared between devices using chi-square tests. Inter-device agreement was also assessed with proportion of agreement and Cohen kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven children (20 male, 10.2±0.6 years) were enrolled, 8 had self-reported asthma. A total of 378 respiratory sounds (smartphone N.=190, digital stethoscope N.=188 [2 missing]) were recorded. The percentage of recordings with quality was high in both devices (93% smartphone vs. 97% digital stethoscope, P=0.065). Adventitious sounds were identified in 11% and 19% of the recordings acquired with smartphone and digital stethoscope, respectively (P=0.021). The overall inter-device proportion of agreement for the presence of adventitious sounds was 90% (kappa 0.60, 95%CI 0.42, 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smartphone lung auscultation seems to be a viable technology for recording respiratory sounds and identifying adventitious sounds in children. Further research is needed to validate its potential for effective remote respiratory disease monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":56337,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung auscultation using smartphone built-in microphone versus digital stethoscope: a comparative early feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Baptista, Inês Pais-Cunha, Rita Amaral, Pedro Vieira-Marques, José Valente, Rute Almeida, Cristina Costa-Santos, Inês Azevedo, João A Fonseca, Manuel Ferreira-Magalhães, Cristina Jácome\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07657-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung auscultation using a smartphone built-in microphone is promising for home monitoring of pediatric respiratory diseases. Our aim was to compare respiratory sounds recorded by a smartphone and a digital stethoscope by assessing the proportion of quality recordings and adventitious sounds detected by each device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative early feasibility study with children from a public school in Northern Portugal was conducted. Lung auscultation was performed at 7 locations (trachea, anterior superior, posterior superior, and posterior inferior regions of both hemithoraces). Two researchers recorded lung auscultation simultaneously with a smartphone and a digital stethoscope, and independently classified recordings regarding their quality (at least one respiratory cycle audible with minimal artefacts) and presence of adventitious sounds. A third researcher resolved the disagreements. Proportions of sounds with quality and with adventitious sounds were compared between devices using chi-square tests. Inter-device agreement was also assessed with proportion of agreement and Cohen kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven children (20 male, 10.2±0.6 years) were enrolled, 8 had self-reported asthma. A total of 378 respiratory sounds (smartphone N.=190, digital stethoscope N.=188 [2 missing]) were recorded. The percentage of recordings with quality was high in both devices (93% smartphone vs. 97% digital stethoscope, P=0.065). Adventitious sounds were identified in 11% and 19% of the recordings acquired with smartphone and digital stethoscope, respectively (P=0.021). The overall inter-device proportion of agreement for the presence of adventitious sounds was 90% (kappa 0.60, 95%CI 0.42, 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smartphone lung auscultation seems to be a viable technology for recording respiratory sounds and identifying adventitious sounds in children. Further research is needed to validate its potential for effective remote respiratory disease monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07657-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07657-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用内置麦克风的智能手机进行肺听诊,有望用于儿科呼吸系统疾病的家庭监测。我们的目的是比较智能手机和数字听诊器记录的呼吸声音,通过评估每种设备检测到的优质录音和外来声音的比例。方法:对葡萄牙北部一所公立学校的儿童进行早期可行性比较研究。在7个位置(气管、前上、后上、后下)行肺听诊。两名研究人员用智能手机和数字听诊器同时记录肺听诊,并根据其质量(至少一个呼吸周期可听到,伪音最小)和外来声音的存在独立分类。第三位研究者解决了分歧。使用卡方检验比较设备之间具有质量和非定音的声音比例。采用协议比例和科恩卡帕法评估设备间协议。结果:纳入27例儿童(男性20例,年龄10.2±0.6岁),其中8例自报哮喘。共记录呼吸音378个,其中智能手机n =190个,数字听诊器n =188个[缺失2个]。两种设备的录音质量百分比都很高(93%的智能手机对97%的数字听诊器,P=0.065)。通过智能手机和数字听诊器获得的录音中,分别有11%和19%识别出了非固定声音(P=0.021)。总体设备间对外音存在的一致性比例为90% (kappa 0.60, 95%CI 0.42, 0.77)。结论:智能手机肺听诊似乎是一种可行的技术,用于记录呼吸声音和识别儿童的非定音。需要进一步的研究来验证其在有效的远程呼吸疾病监测方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lung auscultation using smartphone built-in microphone versus digital stethoscope: a comparative early feasibility study.

Background: Lung auscultation using a smartphone built-in microphone is promising for home monitoring of pediatric respiratory diseases. Our aim was to compare respiratory sounds recorded by a smartphone and a digital stethoscope by assessing the proportion of quality recordings and adventitious sounds detected by each device.

Methods: A comparative early feasibility study with children from a public school in Northern Portugal was conducted. Lung auscultation was performed at 7 locations (trachea, anterior superior, posterior superior, and posterior inferior regions of both hemithoraces). Two researchers recorded lung auscultation simultaneously with a smartphone and a digital stethoscope, and independently classified recordings regarding their quality (at least one respiratory cycle audible with minimal artefacts) and presence of adventitious sounds. A third researcher resolved the disagreements. Proportions of sounds with quality and with adventitious sounds were compared between devices using chi-square tests. Inter-device agreement was also assessed with proportion of agreement and Cohen kappa.

Results: Twenty-seven children (20 male, 10.2±0.6 years) were enrolled, 8 had self-reported asthma. A total of 378 respiratory sounds (smartphone N.=190, digital stethoscope N.=188 [2 missing]) were recorded. The percentage of recordings with quality was high in both devices (93% smartphone vs. 97% digital stethoscope, P=0.065). Adventitious sounds were identified in 11% and 19% of the recordings acquired with smartphone and digital stethoscope, respectively (P=0.021). The overall inter-device proportion of agreement for the presence of adventitious sounds was 90% (kappa 0.60, 95%CI 0.42, 0.77).

Conclusions: Smartphone lung auscultation seems to be a viable technology for recording respiratory sounds and identifying adventitious sounds in children. Further research is needed to validate its potential for effective remote respiratory disease monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
294
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信