护理工作指数实践环境量表的国际基准:荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Eileen T Lake, Bingyu Zhang, Jiayi Tong, Gloria Mpundu, Kelsey N Gross, Malini H Correa, Lauren B Wethman, Lynne Moronski, Domenique Villani, Yong Chen
{"title":"护理工作指数实践环境量表的国际基准:荟萃分析。","authors":"Eileen T Lake, Bingyu Zhang, Jiayi Tong, Gloria Mpundu, Kelsey N Gross, Malini H Correa, Lauren B Wethman, Lynne Moronski, Domenique Villani, Yong Chen","doi":"10.1111/nhs.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index has been used worldwide to measure nurse work environments. International benchmark values for this scale can assist managers in assessing their work environment. The objective was to conduct a meta-analysis of this instrument's composite and subscale values across continents, nursing unit types, and time. Studies published up until September 30, 2023 were identified in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Embase. One-hundred and sixty publications representing 38 countries were included. Most studies were rated as high certainty and low to moderate risk of bias. The pooled point estimate (2.70) indicated that hospital work environments were modestly positive. The weakest work environment domain was Staffing and Resource Adequacy (2.47). Europe had significantly weaker work environments than Asia and North America. Africa and South America had few studies. Better work environments were reported in neonatal intensive care, as compared to medical surgical and critical care units. A small, positive slope over time, which was detected in the three continents, was significant in North America. To promote evidence-based management globally, benchmark values are now available by setting and continent.</p>","PeriodicalId":49730,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences","volume":"26 4","pages":"e70013"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Benchmarks for the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eileen T Lake, Bingyu Zhang, Jiayi Tong, Gloria Mpundu, Kelsey N Gross, Malini H Correa, Lauren B Wethman, Lynne Moronski, Domenique Villani, Yong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nhs.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index has been used worldwide to measure nurse work environments. International benchmark values for this scale can assist managers in assessing their work environment. The objective was to conduct a meta-analysis of this instrument's composite and subscale values across continents, nursing unit types, and time. Studies published up until September 30, 2023 were identified in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Embase. One-hundred and sixty publications representing 38 countries were included. Most studies were rated as high certainty and low to moderate risk of bias. The pooled point estimate (2.70) indicated that hospital work environments were modestly positive. The weakest work environment domain was Staffing and Resource Adequacy (2.47). Europe had significantly weaker work environments than Asia and North America. Africa and South America had few studies. Better work environments were reported in neonatal intensive care, as compared to medical surgical and critical care units. A small, positive slope over time, which was detected in the three continents, was significant in North America. To promote evidence-based management globally, benchmark values are now available by setting and continent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing & Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"e70013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing & Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护理工作指数的实践环境量表已在世界范围内用于衡量护士的工作环境。这个比额表的国际基准值可以帮助管理人员评估他们的工作环境。目的是跨大洲、护理单位类型和时间对该工具的复合和子量表值进行荟萃分析。截至2023年9月30日发表的研究在CINAHL、MEDLINE和Embase中被确认。其中包括代表38个国家的160份出版物。大多数研究被评为高确定性和低至中等偏倚风险。综合点估计(2.70)表明医院的工作环境是适度积极的。最弱的工作环境领域是人员配备和资源充足性(2.47)。欧洲的工作环境明显弱于亚洲和北美。非洲和南美洲的研究很少。据报告,与内科外科和重症监护病房相比,新生儿重症监护病房的工作环境更好。随着时间的推移,在三大洲都发现了一个小的正斜率,在北美是显著的。为了在全球范围内促进循证管理,基准价值现已按地区和大洲提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Benchmarks for the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index: A Meta-Analysis.

The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index has been used worldwide to measure nurse work environments. International benchmark values for this scale can assist managers in assessing their work environment. The objective was to conduct a meta-analysis of this instrument's composite and subscale values across continents, nursing unit types, and time. Studies published up until September 30, 2023 were identified in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Embase. One-hundred and sixty publications representing 38 countries were included. Most studies were rated as high certainty and low to moderate risk of bias. The pooled point estimate (2.70) indicated that hospital work environments were modestly positive. The weakest work environment domain was Staffing and Resource Adequacy (2.47). Europe had significantly weaker work environments than Asia and North America. Africa and South America had few studies. Better work environments were reported in neonatal intensive care, as compared to medical surgical and critical care units. A small, positive slope over time, which was detected in the three continents, was significant in North America. To promote evidence-based management globally, benchmark values are now available by setting and continent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NHS has a multidisciplinary focus and broad scope and a particular focus on the translation of research into clinical practice, inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary work, primary health care, health promotion, health education, management of communicable and non-communicable diseases, implementation of technological innovations and inclusive multicultural approaches to health services and care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信