脚跟提升术治疗插入性跟腱病(LIFTIT)的疗效:一项随机可行性试验。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jaryd Bourke, Shannon Munteanu, Alessandro Garofolini, Simon Taylor, Peter Malliaras
{"title":"脚跟提升术治疗插入性跟腱病(LIFTIT)的疗效:一项随机可行性试验。","authors":"Jaryd Bourke, Shannon Munteanu, Alessandro Garofolini, Simon Taylor, Peter Malliaras","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common and disabling condition. This trial aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention for reducing pain intensity associated with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy were randomised to either the heel lift group or sham intervention group. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated according to demand (recruitment rate and conversion rate), acceptability, adherence, adverse events and retention. Limited efficacy testing was conducted on secondary outcome measures including pain intensity, function, physical activity, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and global rating of change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 25, 2023, and April 7, 2024, we recruited and tested 26 participants (aged 28-65 years, mean [SD] 51 [8]). The pre-determined thresholds were met for demand, acceptability, adherence, retention, pain intensity, function, quality of life and global rating of change and partly met for adverse events, physical activity and use of co-interventions. Between 47 and 241, participants will be needed for a fully powered randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In its current form, a randomised trial of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention is feasible. However, future triallists may need to consider strategies to manage the risk of adverse events and plan to adjust the analyses to account for the use of co-interventions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ACTRN12623000721606.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"17 4","pages":"e70025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of heel lifts for insertional Achilles tendinopathy (LIFTIT): A randomised feasibility trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jaryd Bourke, Shannon Munteanu, Alessandro Garofolini, Simon Taylor, Peter Malliaras\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jfa2.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common and disabling condition. This trial aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention for reducing pain intensity associated with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy were randomised to either the heel lift group or sham intervention group. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated according to demand (recruitment rate and conversion rate), acceptability, adherence, adverse events and retention. Limited efficacy testing was conducted on secondary outcome measures including pain intensity, function, physical activity, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and global rating of change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 25, 2023, and April 7, 2024, we recruited and tested 26 participants (aged 28-65 years, mean [SD] 51 [8]). The pre-determined thresholds were met for demand, acceptability, adherence, retention, pain intensity, function, quality of life and global rating of change and partly met for adverse events, physical activity and use of co-interventions. Between 47 and 241, participants will be needed for a fully powered randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In its current form, a randomised trial of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention is feasible. However, future triallists may need to consider strategies to manage the risk of adverse events and plan to adjust the analyses to account for the use of co-interventions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ACTRN12623000721606.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"e70025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:插入性跟腱病是一种常见的致残性疾病。本试验旨在确定进行平行组随机试验的可行性,以评估与假干预相比,提跟术对减轻与插入性跟腱病相关的疼痛强度的疗效。方法:26例插入性跟腱病患者随机分为足跟抬高组和假干预组。在基线、4周、8周和12周时获得结果测量。主要结局是可行性,根据需求(招募率和转换率)、可接受性、依从性、不良事件和保留进行评估。次要结局指标包括疼痛强度、功能、身体活动、健康相关生活质量、联合干预措施的使用和总体变化评级,进行了有限的疗效测试。结果:在2023年8月25日至2024年4月7日期间,我们招募并测试了26名参与者(年龄28-65岁,平均[SD] 51[8])。预先确定的阈值在需求、可接受性、依从性、保留、疼痛强度、功能、生活质量和总体变化评分方面得到满足,在不良事件、身体活动和使用联合干预措施方面部分得到满足。在47到241名参与者之间,将需要进行全动力随机试验。结论:在目前的形式下,与假干预相比,脚跟提升的随机试验是可行的。然而,未来的试验人员可能需要考虑管理不良事件风险的策略,并计划调整分析以考虑联合干预措施的使用。试验注册:ACTRN12623000721606。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of heel lifts for insertional Achilles tendinopathy (LIFTIT): A randomised feasibility trial.

Objectives: Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common and disabling condition. This trial aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention for reducing pain intensity associated with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.

Methods: Twenty-six people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy were randomised to either the heel lift group or sham intervention group. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated according to demand (recruitment rate and conversion rate), acceptability, adherence, adverse events and retention. Limited efficacy testing was conducted on secondary outcome measures including pain intensity, function, physical activity, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and global rating of change.

Results: Between August 25, 2023, and April 7, 2024, we recruited and tested 26 participants (aged 28-65 years, mean [SD] 51 [8]). The pre-determined thresholds were met for demand, acceptability, adherence, retention, pain intensity, function, quality of life and global rating of change and partly met for adverse events, physical activity and use of co-interventions. Between 47 and 241, participants will be needed for a fully powered randomised trial.

Conclusion: In its current form, a randomised trial of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention is feasible. However, future triallists may need to consider strategies to manage the risk of adverse events and plan to adjust the analyses to account for the use of co-interventions.

Trial registration: ACTRN12623000721606.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信