Jaryd Bourke, Shannon Munteanu, Alessandro Garofolini, Simon Taylor, Peter Malliaras
{"title":"脚跟提升术治疗插入性跟腱病(LIFTIT)的疗效:一项随机可行性试验。","authors":"Jaryd Bourke, Shannon Munteanu, Alessandro Garofolini, Simon Taylor, Peter Malliaras","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common and disabling condition. This trial aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention for reducing pain intensity associated with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy were randomised to either the heel lift group or sham intervention group. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated according to demand (recruitment rate and conversion rate), acceptability, adherence, adverse events and retention. Limited efficacy testing was conducted on secondary outcome measures including pain intensity, function, physical activity, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and global rating of change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 25, 2023, and April 7, 2024, we recruited and tested 26 participants (aged 28-65 years, mean [SD] 51 [8]). The pre-determined thresholds were met for demand, acceptability, adherence, retention, pain intensity, function, quality of life and global rating of change and partly met for adverse events, physical activity and use of co-interventions. Between 47 and 241, participants will be needed for a fully powered randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In its current form, a randomised trial of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention is feasible. However, future triallists may need to consider strategies to manage the risk of adverse events and plan to adjust the analyses to account for the use of co-interventions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ACTRN12623000721606.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"17 4","pages":"e70025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of heel lifts for insertional Achilles tendinopathy (LIFTIT): A randomised feasibility trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jaryd Bourke, Shannon Munteanu, Alessandro Garofolini, Simon Taylor, Peter Malliaras\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jfa2.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common and disabling condition. This trial aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention for reducing pain intensity associated with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy were randomised to either the heel lift group or sham intervention group. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated according to demand (recruitment rate and conversion rate), acceptability, adherence, adverse events and retention. Limited efficacy testing was conducted on secondary outcome measures including pain intensity, function, physical activity, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and global rating of change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 25, 2023, and April 7, 2024, we recruited and tested 26 participants (aged 28-65 years, mean [SD] 51 [8]). The pre-determined thresholds were met for demand, acceptability, adherence, retention, pain intensity, function, quality of life and global rating of change and partly met for adverse events, physical activity and use of co-interventions. Between 47 and 241, participants will be needed for a fully powered randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In its current form, a randomised trial of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention is feasible. However, future triallists may need to consider strategies to manage the risk of adverse events and plan to adjust the analyses to account for the use of co-interventions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ACTRN12623000721606.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"e70025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of heel lifts for insertional Achilles tendinopathy (LIFTIT): A randomised feasibility trial.
Objectives: Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common and disabling condition. This trial aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention for reducing pain intensity associated with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
Methods: Twenty-six people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy were randomised to either the heel lift group or sham intervention group. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated according to demand (recruitment rate and conversion rate), acceptability, adherence, adverse events and retention. Limited efficacy testing was conducted on secondary outcome measures including pain intensity, function, physical activity, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and global rating of change.
Results: Between August 25, 2023, and April 7, 2024, we recruited and tested 26 participants (aged 28-65 years, mean [SD] 51 [8]). The pre-determined thresholds were met for demand, acceptability, adherence, retention, pain intensity, function, quality of life and global rating of change and partly met for adverse events, physical activity and use of co-interventions. Between 47 and 241, participants will be needed for a fully powered randomised trial.
Conclusion: In its current form, a randomised trial of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention is feasible. However, future triallists may need to consider strategies to manage the risk of adverse events and plan to adjust the analyses to account for the use of co-interventions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care.
The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care.
The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.