COVID-19 大流行对布基纳法索孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健服务覆盖面的影响。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Abdoulaye Maïga, Moussa Bougma, Emily Wilson, Théodore S Kaboré, Gildas G Tou, Melinda K Munos, Almamy M Kanté, Safia S Jiwani, Kelsey Zack, Aveika Akum, Neff Walker, Robert E Black, Agbessi Amouzou
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行对布基纳法索孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健服务覆盖面的影响。","authors":"Abdoulaye Maïga, Moussa Bougma, Emily Wilson, Théodore S Kaboré, Gildas G Tou, Melinda K Munos, Almamy M Kanté, Safia S Jiwani, Kelsey Zack, Aveika Akum, Neff Walker, Robert E Black, Agbessi Amouzou","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.05037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While countries' coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency contingency and response plans aimed to prevent and control the spread of the virus, they also caused major disruptions to health services. We assessed the effects of COVID-19 on coverage and inequalities in select maternal, newborn, and child health services in Burkina Faso.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from two cross-sectional household surveys conducted in two provinces, one rural and one urban. The first survey of 3375 households was conducted immediately before the pandemic (February to March 2020) and the second survey in the same areas two years after the pandemic (May to June 2022) using a similar methodology. We compared the coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions and care-seeking between the two surveys to assess the effects of the pandemic on maternal, newborn, and child health services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings did not show significant disruptions in coverage of antenatal service, postnatal care for mothers and babies, child routine vaccination, and care-seeking for sick children during the pandemic. However, there was a dramatic drop of the number of women (23 percentage points) accompanied by their partners for delivery as well as the number of caesarean-section deliveries in urban areas. The shortage of health staff, facility congestion, fear of getting COVID-19 after a caesarean-section admission, and prioritisation of critical health services such as emergency caesarean-section to the detriment of elective cases may explain the decline of caesarean-section rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 did not cause major reversals in the coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in Burkina Faso, except for caesarean sections. We also saw no substantial increases in service coverage. In the absence of a counterfactual, we could not attribute the stagnation to the pandemic. However, the very low proportion of women reporting disruption in care-seeking suggests some resilience of the health systems to mitigate the negative impacts of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"05037"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal, newborn, and child health service coverage in Burkina Faso.\",\"authors\":\"Abdoulaye Maïga, Moussa Bougma, Emily Wilson, Théodore S Kaboré, Gildas G Tou, Melinda K Munos, Almamy M Kanté, Safia S Jiwani, Kelsey Zack, Aveika Akum, Neff Walker, Robert E Black, Agbessi Amouzou\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.14.05037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While countries' coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency contingency and response plans aimed to prevent and control the spread of the virus, they also caused major disruptions to health services. We assessed the effects of COVID-19 on coverage and inequalities in select maternal, newborn, and child health services in Burkina Faso.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from two cross-sectional household surveys conducted in two provinces, one rural and one urban. The first survey of 3375 households was conducted immediately before the pandemic (February to March 2020) and the second survey in the same areas two years after the pandemic (May to June 2022) using a similar methodology. We compared the coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions and care-seeking between the two surveys to assess the effects of the pandemic on maternal, newborn, and child health services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings did not show significant disruptions in coverage of antenatal service, postnatal care for mothers and babies, child routine vaccination, and care-seeking for sick children during the pandemic. However, there was a dramatic drop of the number of women (23 percentage points) accompanied by their partners for delivery as well as the number of caesarean-section deliveries in urban areas. The shortage of health staff, facility congestion, fear of getting COVID-19 after a caesarean-section admission, and prioritisation of critical health services such as emergency caesarean-section to the detriment of elective cases may explain the decline of caesarean-section rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 did not cause major reversals in the coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in Burkina Faso, except for caesarean sections. We also saw no substantial increases in service coverage. In the absence of a counterfactual, we could not attribute the stagnation to the pandemic. However, the very low proportion of women reporting disruption in care-seeking suggests some resilience of the health systems to mitigate the negative impacts of the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"05037\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658717/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.05037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.05037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然各国的冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)紧急应急和响应计划旨在预防和控制病毒传播,但也对医疗服务造成了重大干扰。我们评估了 COVID-19 对布基纳法索特定孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健服务覆盖率和不平等现象的影响:我们分析了在两个省(一个农村省和一个城市省)进行的两次横断面家庭调查的数据。第一次调查在疫情爆发前夕(2020 年 2 月至 3 月)进行,共调查了 3375 户家庭;第二次调查在疫情爆发两年后(2022 年 5 月至 6 月)在同一地区进行,采用了类似的方法。我们比较了两次调查中孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健干预措施的覆盖范围以及寻求护理的情况,以评估大流行对孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健服务的影响:结果:我们的调查结果显示,在大流行期间,产前服务、母婴产后护理、儿童常规疫苗接种和患病儿童寻求护理的覆盖率并没有出现明显的中断。然而,在城市地区,由伴侣陪伴分娩的妇女人数和剖腹产人数急剧下降(23 个百分点)。医护人员短缺、医疗机构拥挤、担心剖腹产后感染 COVID-19,以及优先考虑急诊剖腹产等关键医疗服务而忽视择期剖腹产,可能是剖腹产率下降的原因:除剖腹产外,COVID-19 并未导致布基纳法索孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健服务覆盖率出现重大逆转。我们也没有看到服务覆盖率的大幅增长。在缺乏反事实的情况下,我们无法将这种停滞归咎于大流行病。然而,报告就医中断的妇女比例很低,这表明卫生系统具有一定的复原力,能够减轻大流行病的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal, newborn, and child health service coverage in Burkina Faso.

Background: While countries' coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency contingency and response plans aimed to prevent and control the spread of the virus, they also caused major disruptions to health services. We assessed the effects of COVID-19 on coverage and inequalities in select maternal, newborn, and child health services in Burkina Faso.

Methods: We analysed data from two cross-sectional household surveys conducted in two provinces, one rural and one urban. The first survey of 3375 households was conducted immediately before the pandemic (February to March 2020) and the second survey in the same areas two years after the pandemic (May to June 2022) using a similar methodology. We compared the coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions and care-seeking between the two surveys to assess the effects of the pandemic on maternal, newborn, and child health services.

Results: Our findings did not show significant disruptions in coverage of antenatal service, postnatal care for mothers and babies, child routine vaccination, and care-seeking for sick children during the pandemic. However, there was a dramatic drop of the number of women (23 percentage points) accompanied by their partners for delivery as well as the number of caesarean-section deliveries in urban areas. The shortage of health staff, facility congestion, fear of getting COVID-19 after a caesarean-section admission, and prioritisation of critical health services such as emergency caesarean-section to the detriment of elective cases may explain the decline of caesarean-section rates.

Conclusions: COVID-19 did not cause major reversals in the coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in Burkina Faso, except for caesarean sections. We also saw no substantial increases in service coverage. In the absence of a counterfactual, we could not attribute the stagnation to the pandemic. However, the very low proportion of women reporting disruption in care-seeking suggests some resilience of the health systems to mitigate the negative impacts of the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信