新型磷酸二酯酶3和4抑制剂ensifentrine治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 2.4 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Eeshal Fatima , Obaid Ur Rehman , Zain Ali Nadeem , Umar Akram , Riyan Imtiaz Karamat , Muhammad Omar Larik , Maurish Fatima , Joshua Chitwood , Arslan Ahmad , Sarah Esposito , Abdulqadir J. Nashwan
{"title":"新型磷酸二酯酶3和4抑制剂ensifentrine治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Eeshal Fatima ,&nbsp;Obaid Ur Rehman ,&nbsp;Zain Ali Nadeem ,&nbsp;Umar Akram ,&nbsp;Riyan Imtiaz Karamat ,&nbsp;Muhammad Omar Larik ,&nbsp;Maurish Fatima ,&nbsp;Joshua Chitwood ,&nbsp;Arslan Ahmad ,&nbsp;Sarah Esposito ,&nbsp;Abdulqadir J. Nashwan","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ensifentrine in COPD via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a detailed literature search on Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane on the basis of pre-specified eligibility criteria. We used Review Manager to calculate pooled mean differences (MD) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) using a random effects model. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included RCTs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 4 studies, consisting of 2020 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The mean age ranged from 62.5 years to 65.5 years in the included studies. All the included studies were at low risk of bias. Ensifentrine 3 mg dose significantly improved the mean peak Forced Expiratory Volume-1 (FEV-1), morning trough FEV-1, TDI score, ERS score, and SGRQ-C score as compared to the placebo, yielding a pooled MD of 149.76 (95% CI, 127.9 to 171.6), 43.93 (95% CI, 23.82 to 64.05), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.21, −1.20 (95% CI, −1.99 to −0.40), and −1.92 (95% CI, −3.24 to −0.59), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ensifentrine is associated with improvements in outcomes related to COPD symptoms such as peak FEV-1, morning trough FEV-1 and TDI in the patients suffering from this chronic disease. It is also associated with improved quality of life as seen by E-RS score and SGRQ-C score.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":"63 1","pages":"Pages 146-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of ensifentrine, a novel phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Eeshal Fatima ,&nbsp;Obaid Ur Rehman ,&nbsp;Zain Ali Nadeem ,&nbsp;Umar Akram ,&nbsp;Riyan Imtiaz Karamat ,&nbsp;Muhammad Omar Larik ,&nbsp;Maurish Fatima ,&nbsp;Joshua Chitwood ,&nbsp;Arslan Ahmad ,&nbsp;Sarah Esposito ,&nbsp;Abdulqadir J. Nashwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.12.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ensifentrine in COPD via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a detailed literature search on Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane on the basis of pre-specified eligibility criteria. We used Review Manager to calculate pooled mean differences (MD) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) using a random effects model. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included RCTs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 4 studies, consisting of 2020 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The mean age ranged from 62.5 years to 65.5 years in the included studies. All the included studies were at low risk of bias. Ensifentrine 3 mg dose significantly improved the mean peak Forced Expiratory Volume-1 (FEV-1), morning trough FEV-1, TDI score, ERS score, and SGRQ-C score as compared to the placebo, yielding a pooled MD of 149.76 (95% CI, 127.9 to 171.6), 43.93 (95% CI, 23.82 to 64.05), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.21, −1.20 (95% CI, −1.99 to −0.40), and −1.92 (95% CI, −3.24 to −0.59), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ensifentrine is associated with improvements in outcomes related to COPD symptoms such as peak FEV-1, morning trough FEV-1 and TDI in the patients suffering from this chronic disease. It is also associated with improved quality of life as seen by E-RS score and SGRQ-C score.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory investigation\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 146-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524001990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524001990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们通过随机对照试验(rct)的系统评价和荟萃分析来评估恩西芬汀治疗COPD的疗效和安全性。方法:我们在Medline(通过PubMed)、Scopus、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane上根据预先指定的资格标准进行了详细的文献检索。我们使用Review Manager使用随机效应模型计算汇总平均差异(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)。采用Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 (rob2)工具评估纳入的rct的偏倚风险。结果:meta分析共纳入4项研究,共纳入2020例患者。在纳入的研究中,患者的平均年龄从62.5岁到65.5岁不等。所有纳入的研究均为低偏倚风险。与安慰剂相比,Ensifentrine 3mg剂量显著改善了平均峰值用力呼气量-1 (FEV-1)、晨间呼气量-1、TDI评分、ERS评分和SGRQ-C评分,合并MD分别为149.76 (95% CI, 127.9 ~ 171.6)、43.93 (95% CI, 23.82 ~ 64.05)、0.92 (95% CI, 0.64 ~ 1.21)、-1.20 (95% CI, -1.99 ~ -0.40)和-1.92 (95% CI, -3.24 ~ -0.59)。结论:在患有慢性疾病的患者中,恩西芬汀与COPD症状相关的结局(如FEV-1峰值、FEV-1晨间低谷和TDI)的改善相关。从E-RS评分和SGRQ-C评分来看,它也与生活质量的改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of ensifentrine, a novel phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ensifentrine in COPD via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

We performed a detailed literature search on Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane on the basis of pre-specified eligibility criteria. We used Review Manager to calculate pooled mean differences (MD) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) using a random effects model. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included RCTs.

Results

A total of 4 studies, consisting of 2020 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The mean age ranged from 62.5 years to 65.5 years in the included studies. All the included studies were at low risk of bias. Ensifentrine 3 mg dose significantly improved the mean peak Forced Expiratory Volume-1 (FEV-1), morning trough FEV-1, TDI score, ERS score, and SGRQ-C score as compared to the placebo, yielding a pooled MD of 149.76 (95% CI, 127.9 to 171.6), 43.93 (95% CI, 23.82 to 64.05), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.21, −1.20 (95% CI, −1.99 to −0.40), and −1.92 (95% CI, −3.24 to −0.59), respectively.

Conclusion

Ensifentrine is associated with improvements in outcomes related to COPD symptoms such as peak FEV-1, morning trough FEV-1 and TDI in the patients suffering from this chronic disease. It is also associated with improved quality of life as seen by E-RS score and SGRQ-C score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信