肿瘤浸润性淋巴细胞(til) -病理学,现状?-全球调查。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Kristijan Skok, Konstantin Bräutigam
{"title":"肿瘤浸润性淋巴细胞(til) -病理学,现状?-全球调查。","authors":"Kristijan Skok, Konstantin Bräutigam","doi":"10.1016/j.prp.2024.155775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the tumor microenvironment have become increasingly important in cancer research, and immunotherapy has achieved major breakthroughs in improving patient outcomes. Despite the significant role of the pathologist in identifying, subtyping and reporting TILs, the implementation and assessment of TILs in pathology routine remains vague. To assess the actual use of TILs in routine clinical practice, a formal standardized questionnaire was disseminated on two social media platforms (\"X\" and LinkedIn) and by email in June 2024. Based on the results, we conducted a literature review on TILs via Medline/Pubmed in the two most scored and reported entities, namely malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer (CRC). 77 participants from 24 different countries around the world, mostly pathologists (n = 63, 82.0 %), completed the survey. More than half of the participants do not assess or report TILs in their daily (clinical) practice, a trend consistent across the countries included in the study. A variety of methods are used to report TILs, ranging from Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based scoring algorithms to quantification by eyeballing. Despite recognizing the importance of TIL assessment in clinical routine, many participants find it time-consuming and express a strong preference for AI-based quantification. Our survey reflects the perspective of mostly early career pathologists who recognize the importance of TILs in cancer but face challenges in implementation. The development of AI tools and consensus guidelines could alleviate these barriers. In addition, increasing the visibility and understanding of the role of pathologists within the medical community remains critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":19916,"journal":{"name":"Pathology, research and practice","volume":"266 ","pages":"155775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) - Pathologia, quo vadis? - A global survey.\",\"authors\":\"Kristijan Skok, Konstantin Bräutigam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prp.2024.155775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the tumor microenvironment have become increasingly important in cancer research, and immunotherapy has achieved major breakthroughs in improving patient outcomes. Despite the significant role of the pathologist in identifying, subtyping and reporting TILs, the implementation and assessment of TILs in pathology routine remains vague. To assess the actual use of TILs in routine clinical practice, a formal standardized questionnaire was disseminated on two social media platforms (\\\"X\\\" and LinkedIn) and by email in June 2024. Based on the results, we conducted a literature review on TILs via Medline/Pubmed in the two most scored and reported entities, namely malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer (CRC). 77 participants from 24 different countries around the world, mostly pathologists (n = 63, 82.0 %), completed the survey. More than half of the participants do not assess or report TILs in their daily (clinical) practice, a trend consistent across the countries included in the study. A variety of methods are used to report TILs, ranging from Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based scoring algorithms to quantification by eyeballing. Despite recognizing the importance of TIL assessment in clinical routine, many participants find it time-consuming and express a strong preference for AI-based quantification. Our survey reflects the perspective of mostly early career pathologists who recognize the importance of TILs in cancer but face challenges in implementation. The development of AI tools and consensus guidelines could alleviate these barriers. In addition, increasing the visibility and understanding of the role of pathologists within the medical community remains critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathology, research and practice\",\"volume\":\"266 \",\"pages\":\"155775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathology, research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2024.155775\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology, research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2024.155775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(tumor -浸润淋巴细胞,til)和肿瘤微环境在癌症研究中越来越重要,免疫治疗在改善患者预后方面取得重大突破。尽管病理学家在识别、分型和报告TILs方面发挥了重要作用,但在病理学常规中对TILs的实施和评估仍然模糊不清。为了评估TILs在常规临床实践中的实际使用情况,于2024年6月在两个社交媒体平台(“X”和LinkedIn)和电子邮件上分发了一份正式的标准化问卷。基于这些结果,我们通过Medline/Pubmed对评分和报道最多的两个实体,即恶性黑色素瘤和结直肠癌(CRC)的til进行了文献综述。来自全球24个不同国家的77名参与者完成了调查,其中大多数是病理学家(n = 63,82.0 %)。超过一半的参与者在日常(临床)实践中没有评估或报告TILs,这一趋势在研究中包括的国家中是一致的。报告TILs的方法多种多样,从基于人工智能(AI)的评分算法到目测量化。尽管认识到TIL评估在临床常规中的重要性,但许多参与者发现它很耗时,并表达了对基于人工智能的量化的强烈偏好。我们的调查反映了大多数早期职业病理学家的观点,他们认识到til在癌症中的重要性,但在实施方面面临挑战。人工智能工具和共识指南的发展可以缓解这些障碍。此外,增加可视性和理解的作用的病理学家在医学界仍然是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) - Pathologia, quo vadis? - A global survey.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the tumor microenvironment have become increasingly important in cancer research, and immunotherapy has achieved major breakthroughs in improving patient outcomes. Despite the significant role of the pathologist in identifying, subtyping and reporting TILs, the implementation and assessment of TILs in pathology routine remains vague. To assess the actual use of TILs in routine clinical practice, a formal standardized questionnaire was disseminated on two social media platforms ("X" and LinkedIn) and by email in June 2024. Based on the results, we conducted a literature review on TILs via Medline/Pubmed in the two most scored and reported entities, namely malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer (CRC). 77 participants from 24 different countries around the world, mostly pathologists (n = 63, 82.0 %), completed the survey. More than half of the participants do not assess or report TILs in their daily (clinical) practice, a trend consistent across the countries included in the study. A variety of methods are used to report TILs, ranging from Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based scoring algorithms to quantification by eyeballing. Despite recognizing the importance of TIL assessment in clinical routine, many participants find it time-consuming and express a strong preference for AI-based quantification. Our survey reflects the perspective of mostly early career pathologists who recognize the importance of TILs in cancer but face challenges in implementation. The development of AI tools and consensus guidelines could alleviate these barriers. In addition, increasing the visibility and understanding of the role of pathologists within the medical community remains critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
405
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Pathology, Research and Practice provides accessible coverage of the most recent developments across the entire field of pathology: Reviews focus on recent progress in pathology, while Comments look at interesting current problems and at hypotheses for future developments in pathology. Original Papers present novel findings on all aspects of general, anatomic and molecular pathology. Rapid Communications inform readers on preliminary findings that may be relevant for further studies and need to be communicated quickly. Teaching Cases look at new aspects or special diagnostic problems of diseases and at case reports relevant for the pathologist''s practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信