提高囊性纤维化新生儿筛查算法公平性的促进因素和障碍。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Pulmonology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1002/ppul.27449
Kellyn Madden, Rebecca Mueller, Camille Brown, Kathleen D Valverde, Elinor Langfelder-Schwind
{"title":"提高囊性纤维化新生儿筛查算法公平性的促进因素和障碍。","authors":"Kellyn Madden, Rebecca Mueller, Camille Brown, Kathleen D Valverde, Elinor Langfelder-Schwind","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) was universally implemented in the United States in 2010 to improve disease outcomes. Despite universal screening, disparities in outcomes currently exist between people with CF (PwCF) with Black/African, Asian, Indigenous, and Latino/Hispanic ancestry in comparison to PwCF of European ancestry. This is in part because CFTR panels used for newborn screening are often based on variants common in European ancestries leading to higher rates of false negatives for PwCF from minoritized racial and ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigated how states evaluate and update their CFNBS algorithms through semi-structured interviews with professionals from four states with ethnically diverse populations and one national consultant. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were identified encompassing facilitators, barriers, and motivations for evaluating and updating CF NBS algorithms. Facilitators of effective evaluation and updating of algorithms included effective communication with CF clinical centers and extensive support for CF as compared to other conditions. Although participants stated that their respective NBS programs were aware of the disparate impact of their CF panels on PwCF from minoritized racial and ethnic groups, motivations to decrease this disparity were hampered by a range of funding and logistical barriers, such as limited information about false negative cases and difficulties incorporating next generation sequencing technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shed light on the experiences of states considering alterations to their CFNBS panels, revealing several key barriers and facilitators to implementing equitable CFNBS algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":"e27449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitators and Barriers to Increasing Equity in Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Algorithms.\",\"authors\":\"Kellyn Madden, Rebecca Mueller, Camille Brown, Kathleen D Valverde, Elinor Langfelder-Schwind\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.27449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) was universally implemented in the United States in 2010 to improve disease outcomes. Despite universal screening, disparities in outcomes currently exist between people with CF (PwCF) with Black/African, Asian, Indigenous, and Latino/Hispanic ancestry in comparison to PwCF of European ancestry. This is in part because CFTR panels used for newborn screening are often based on variants common in European ancestries leading to higher rates of false negatives for PwCF from minoritized racial and ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigated how states evaluate and update their CFNBS algorithms through semi-structured interviews with professionals from four states with ethnically diverse populations and one national consultant. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were identified encompassing facilitators, barriers, and motivations for evaluating and updating CF NBS algorithms. Facilitators of effective evaluation and updating of algorithms included effective communication with CF clinical centers and extensive support for CF as compared to other conditions. Although participants stated that their respective NBS programs were aware of the disparate impact of their CF panels on PwCF from minoritized racial and ethnic groups, motivations to decrease this disparity were hampered by a range of funding and logistical barriers, such as limited information about false negative cases and difficulties incorporating next generation sequencing technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shed light on the experiences of states considering alterations to their CFNBS panels, revealing several key barriers and facilitators to implementing equitable CFNBS algorithms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e27449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27449\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿囊性纤维化(CF)筛查(NBS)于2010年在美国普遍实施,以改善疾病预后。尽管进行了普遍筛查,但与欧洲血统的PwCF相比,黑人/非洲人、亚洲人、土著和拉丁裔/西班牙裔CF患者(PwCF)的结果存在差异。这在一定程度上是因为用于新生儿筛查的CFTR面板通常基于欧洲血统中常见的变异,导致少数种族和族裔群体的PwCF假阴性率更高。方法:本研究通过对来自四个种族多样化州的专业人士和一名国家顾问的半结构化访谈,调查了各州如何评估和更新其CFNBS算法。访谈内容逐字记录,并通过归纳主题分析进行分析。结果:确定了五个主题,包括评估和更新CF NBS算法的促进因素、障碍和动机。有效评估和更新算法的促进因素包括与CF临床中心的有效沟通以及与其他条件相比对CF的广泛支持。尽管参与者表示,他们各自的NBS计划意识到他们的CF小组对少数种族和民族群体的PwCF的不同影响,但减少这种差异的动机受到一系列资金和后勤障碍的阻碍,例如关于假阴性病例的信息有限,以及难以采用下一代测序技术。结论:本研究揭示了考虑改变其CFNBS小组的各州的经验,揭示了实施公平的CFNBS算法的几个关键障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facilitators and Barriers to Increasing Equity in Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Algorithms.

Background: Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) was universally implemented in the United States in 2010 to improve disease outcomes. Despite universal screening, disparities in outcomes currently exist between people with CF (PwCF) with Black/African, Asian, Indigenous, and Latino/Hispanic ancestry in comparison to PwCF of European ancestry. This is in part because CFTR panels used for newborn screening are often based on variants common in European ancestries leading to higher rates of false negatives for PwCF from minoritized racial and ethnic groups.

Methods: This study investigated how states evaluate and update their CFNBS algorithms through semi-structured interviews with professionals from four states with ethnically diverse populations and one national consultant. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Five themes were identified encompassing facilitators, barriers, and motivations for evaluating and updating CF NBS algorithms. Facilitators of effective evaluation and updating of algorithms included effective communication with CF clinical centers and extensive support for CF as compared to other conditions. Although participants stated that their respective NBS programs were aware of the disparate impact of their CF panels on PwCF from minoritized racial and ethnic groups, motivations to decrease this disparity were hampered by a range of funding and logistical barriers, such as limited information about false negative cases and difficulties incorporating next generation sequencing technology.

Conclusions: This study shed light on the experiences of states considering alterations to their CFNBS panels, revealing several key barriers and facilitators to implementing equitable CFNBS algorithms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信