IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Mary C Geneau, David L Carey, Paul B Gastin, Sam Robertson, Lachlan P James
{"title":"Replicability of Strength Domains in Australian Rules Football Athletes.","authors":"Mary C Geneau, David L Carey, Paul B Gastin, Sam Robertson, Lachlan P James","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Geneau, MC, Carey, DL, Gastin, PB, Robertson, S, and James, LP. Replicability of strength domains in Australian rules football athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Maximal lower body strength is a multidimensional construct defined as the maximum force application under specific task constraints. It is crucial for many athletic tasks and is frequently assessed in strength and conditioning environments. Recent technological advancements have increased the number of measurement options for lower body strength, making data interpretation and translation challenging. Principal component analyses (PCA) methods have been proposed to inform strength test and metric selection in field sport athletes, but these methods are limited to cross-sectional designs. This study aimed to investigated the replicability of a PCA method for metric reduction and selection at 2 time points. Thirty-three Australian rules football athletes completed 7 lower body extensor strength tests during preseason (T1) and end of season (T2), each resulting in 280 force-time metrics. At each time point, 9 PCA components were required to explain at least 70% of the variance in the data set, and 7 components demonstrated similar metric loadings onto the components. However, the variable selection procedure did not return the exact same set of variables at both time points. These results suggest that while the number and loading of strength domains are consistent in Australian rules football athletes, the variable selection procedure was not fully replicable. Overall, practitioners can use this information to select tests and metrics within the domains and subdomains identified in this study to capture a range of lower body strength information from their athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Geneau、MC、Carey、DL、Gastin、PB、Robertson、S 和 James、LP。澳大利亚规则足球运动员力量领域的可复制性。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-最大下肢力量是一种多维结构,被定义为在特定任务限制条件下的最大力量应用。它对许多运动任务至关重要,经常在力量和体能训练环境中进行评估。最近的技术进步增加了下半身力量的测量选项,这使得数据解释和转换具有挑战性。有人提出了主成分分析(PCA)方法,以指导野外运动运动员的力量测试和指标选择,但这些方法仅限于横断面设计。本研究旨在调查 PCA 方法在两个时间点进行指标缩减和选择的可复制性。33 名澳大利亚规则足球运动员分别在季前赛(T1)和赛季末(T2)完成了 7 项下半身伸肌力量测试,每项测试产生 280 个力量-时间指标。在每个时间点,都需要 9 个 PCA 分量来解释数据集中至少 70% 的方差,其中 7 个分量表现出相似的指标载荷。然而,变量选择程序在两个时间点并没有返回完全相同的变量集。这些结果表明,虽然澳大利亚规则足球运动员力量领域的数量和负荷是一致的,但变量选择程序并不完全可复制。总之,从业人员可以利用这些信息,在本研究确定的领域和子领域内选择测试和指标,以获取运动员的一系列下半身力量信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Replicability of Strength Domains in Australian Rules Football Athletes.

Abstract: Geneau, MC, Carey, DL, Gastin, PB, Robertson, S, and James, LP. Replicability of strength domains in Australian rules football athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Maximal lower body strength is a multidimensional construct defined as the maximum force application under specific task constraints. It is crucial for many athletic tasks and is frequently assessed in strength and conditioning environments. Recent technological advancements have increased the number of measurement options for lower body strength, making data interpretation and translation challenging. Principal component analyses (PCA) methods have been proposed to inform strength test and metric selection in field sport athletes, but these methods are limited to cross-sectional designs. This study aimed to investigated the replicability of a PCA method for metric reduction and selection at 2 time points. Thirty-three Australian rules football athletes completed 7 lower body extensor strength tests during preseason (T1) and end of season (T2), each resulting in 280 force-time metrics. At each time point, 9 PCA components were required to explain at least 70% of the variance in the data set, and 7 components demonstrated similar metric loadings onto the components. However, the variable selection procedure did not return the exact same set of variables at both time points. These results suggest that while the number and loading of strength domains are consistent in Australian rules football athletes, the variable selection procedure was not fully replicable. Overall, practitioners can use this information to select tests and metrics within the domains and subdomains identified in this study to capture a range of lower body strength information from their athletes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信