Qvella FAST系统与传统单菌阳性血培养快速鉴定及药敏试验方法的比较

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01332-24
Malo Penven, Manon Louazon, Charlotte Freret, Alexandra Sauron, Meghane Pilard, Elisa Creignou, Ophélie Gardan, Maryne Haumont, Asma Zouari, Stéphane Lorre, Vincent Cattoir
{"title":"Qvella FAST系统与传统单菌阳性血培养快速鉴定及药敏试验方法的比较","authors":"Malo Penven, Manon Louazon, Charlotte Freret, Alexandra Sauron, Meghane Pilard, Elisa Creignou, Ophélie Gardan, Maryne Haumont, Asma Zouari, Stéphane Lorre, Vincent Cattoir","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01332-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid and accurate diagnosis of sepsis is of paramount importance to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. The Qvella FAST System is a new instrument that concentrates and purifies bacteria from positive-flagged blood culture bottles (PFBCBs) to produce a \"liquid\" colony comparable to a subcultured colony in less than 40 min for rapid ID and calibrated antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). In this study, we evaluated performances of the FAST System workflow and our rapid routine manual workflow (bacterial pellet obtained after lysis, cleaning, washing, and centrifugation for ID; AST by disc diffusion by direct inoculation after dilution) by comparison to the reference method based on 24-h bacterial subcultures. Two panels of PFBCBs were studied: panel A (including 107 prospective BCs from septic patients, October-November 2022) and panel B (including 102 BCs spiked with difficult-to-identify bacteria [mostly streptococci] and multidrug-resistant isolates), resulting in a total of 209 evaluable samples. The FAST System provided a correct ID to the species level in 178/209 (85.2%) of cases. For AST, the categorical agreement (CA) of the FAST System was 99.4%, with rates of very major (VME), major (ME), and minor (mE) errors of 0.59%, 0.20%, and 0.26%, respectively. Our rapid routine workflow based on manual methods show similar results for ID (86.2%) and AST (CA, 99.6%; VME, 0.50%; ME, 0.16%; mE, 0.13%). In conclusion, the Qvella FAST system, a promising tool that can reduce diagnostic time by approximately 1 day, shows excellent performances for rapid ID and AST.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0133224"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative performances of the Qvella FAST system and conventional methods for rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing on monomicrobial positive blood cultures.\",\"authors\":\"Malo Penven, Manon Louazon, Charlotte Freret, Alexandra Sauron, Meghane Pilard, Elisa Creignou, Ophélie Gardan, Maryne Haumont, Asma Zouari, Stéphane Lorre, Vincent Cattoir\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jcm.01332-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rapid and accurate diagnosis of sepsis is of paramount importance to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. The Qvella FAST System is a new instrument that concentrates and purifies bacteria from positive-flagged blood culture bottles (PFBCBs) to produce a \\\"liquid\\\" colony comparable to a subcultured colony in less than 40 min for rapid ID and calibrated antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). In this study, we evaluated performances of the FAST System workflow and our rapid routine manual workflow (bacterial pellet obtained after lysis, cleaning, washing, and centrifugation for ID; AST by disc diffusion by direct inoculation after dilution) by comparison to the reference method based on 24-h bacterial subcultures. Two panels of PFBCBs were studied: panel A (including 107 prospective BCs from septic patients, October-November 2022) and panel B (including 102 BCs spiked with difficult-to-identify bacteria [mostly streptococci] and multidrug-resistant isolates), resulting in a total of 209 evaluable samples. The FAST System provided a correct ID to the species level in 178/209 (85.2%) of cases. For AST, the categorical agreement (CA) of the FAST System was 99.4%, with rates of very major (VME), major (ME), and minor (mE) errors of 0.59%, 0.20%, and 0.26%, respectively. Our rapid routine workflow based on manual methods show similar results for ID (86.2%) and AST (CA, 99.6%; VME, 0.50%; ME, 0.16%; mE, 0.13%). In conclusion, the Qvella FAST system, a promising tool that can reduce diagnostic time by approximately 1 day, shows excellent performances for rapid ID and AST.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0133224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01332-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01332-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速和准确的诊断败血症是至关重要的,以减少相关的发病率和死亡率。Qvella FAST系统是一种新型仪器,可浓缩和纯化阳性标记血培养瓶(PFBCBs)中的细菌,在不到40分钟的时间内产生与传代培养菌落相当的“液体”菌落,用于快速鉴定和校准抗生素敏感性试验(AST)。在这项研究中,我们评估了FAST系统工作流程的性能和我们快速的常规人工工作流程(裂解、清洗、洗涤和离心后获得细菌颗粒进行ID;用碟扩散法(稀释后直接接种法)与对照法进行24h细菌传代培养的比较。研究了两组pfbcb: A组(包括来自感染性疾病患者的107个预期bc, 2022年10月至11月)和B组(包括102个bc,其中添加了难以识别的细菌[主要是链球菌]和耐多药分离株),共获得209个可评估样本。在178/209例(85.2%)病例中,FAST系统对物种水平的识别率是正确的。AST的分类一致性(CA)为99.4%,非常严重(VME)、严重(ME)和轻微(ME)的错误率分别为0.59%、0.20%和0.26%。基于人工方法的快速常规工作流程显示ID(86.2%)和AST (CA, 99.6%)的结果相似;VME, 0.50%;我,0.16%;我,0.13%)。总之,Qvella FAST系统是一种很有前景的工具,可以将诊断时间缩短约1天,在快速ID和AST方面表现出色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative performances of the Qvella FAST system and conventional methods for rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing on monomicrobial positive blood cultures.

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of sepsis is of paramount importance to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. The Qvella FAST System is a new instrument that concentrates and purifies bacteria from positive-flagged blood culture bottles (PFBCBs) to produce a "liquid" colony comparable to a subcultured colony in less than 40 min for rapid ID and calibrated antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). In this study, we evaluated performances of the FAST System workflow and our rapid routine manual workflow (bacterial pellet obtained after lysis, cleaning, washing, and centrifugation for ID; AST by disc diffusion by direct inoculation after dilution) by comparison to the reference method based on 24-h bacterial subcultures. Two panels of PFBCBs were studied: panel A (including 107 prospective BCs from septic patients, October-November 2022) and panel B (including 102 BCs spiked with difficult-to-identify bacteria [mostly streptococci] and multidrug-resistant isolates), resulting in a total of 209 evaluable samples. The FAST System provided a correct ID to the species level in 178/209 (85.2%) of cases. For AST, the categorical agreement (CA) of the FAST System was 99.4%, with rates of very major (VME), major (ME), and minor (mE) errors of 0.59%, 0.20%, and 0.26%, respectively. Our rapid routine workflow based on manual methods show similar results for ID (86.2%) and AST (CA, 99.6%; VME, 0.50%; ME, 0.16%; mE, 0.13%). In conclusion, the Qvella FAST system, a promising tool that can reduce diagnostic time by approximately 1 day, shows excellent performances for rapid ID and AST.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信