意大利认知障碍患者的远端神经心理多域评估:可靠性和用户满意度。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1177/13872877241300186
Miriana Maria Bressan, Anna Maria Musso, Tommaso Bovi, Bruno Bonetti, Chiara Zucchella
{"title":"意大利认知障碍患者的远端神经心理多域评估:可靠性和用户满意度。","authors":"Miriana Maria Bressan, Anna Maria Musso, Tommaso Bovi, Bruno Bonetti, Chiara Zucchella","doi":"10.1177/13872877241300186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tele-neuropsychology has already been employed in neurocognitive disorders, however, in Italy, the evidence of its psychometric quality and satisfaction is still limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to: (1) evaluate the reliability of a standardized battery of neuropsychological screening and domain-specific tests delivered at home via videoconference to a sample of Italian people with cognitive disorders, compared with traditional face-to-face administration; (2) assess the feasibility and satisfaction about remote administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This crossover study enrolled patients with subjective cognitive disorder, mild neurocognitive disorder, or dementia. All participants performed a brief neuropsychological screening assessment in face-to-face or remote mode. People with milder cognitive disorders (Mini-Mental State Examination ≥ 20) also performed an extended neuropsychological battery. After 15 days, each participant repeated the same assessment in the opposite mode. Finally, participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>114 participants were initially enrolled in the study and 100 individuals performed both face-to-face and remote assessments (14 dropouts). All neuropsychological tests showed agreement between the two modes of administration, except for the Digit Span Forward (<i>p </i>= 0.009) and oral-Symbol Digit Modalities Test (<i>p </i>< 0.001). According to Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCCs), tests also showed good or excellent reliability (LCCCs between 0.609 and 0.964); only the Digit Span Backward and the Stroop test showed moderate reliability (LCCCs =0.514-0.441, respectively). Among 100 participants, 65 patients answered the satisfaction questionnaire, declaring high satisfaction for the remote evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tele-neuropsychology seems to work with in-home assessments among Italian patients with cognitive disorders and seems to be acceptable to them.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong><i>ClinicalTrials.gov</i>, Identifier: NCT06078332 (October 17, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"268-281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tele-neuropsychological multidomain assessment in Italian people with cognitive disorders: Reliability and user satisfaction.\",\"authors\":\"Miriana Maria Bressan, Anna Maria Musso, Tommaso Bovi, Bruno Bonetti, Chiara Zucchella\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877241300186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tele-neuropsychology has already been employed in neurocognitive disorders, however, in Italy, the evidence of its psychometric quality and satisfaction is still limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to: (1) evaluate the reliability of a standardized battery of neuropsychological screening and domain-specific tests delivered at home via videoconference to a sample of Italian people with cognitive disorders, compared with traditional face-to-face administration; (2) assess the feasibility and satisfaction about remote administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This crossover study enrolled patients with subjective cognitive disorder, mild neurocognitive disorder, or dementia. All participants performed a brief neuropsychological screening assessment in face-to-face or remote mode. People with milder cognitive disorders (Mini-Mental State Examination ≥ 20) also performed an extended neuropsychological battery. After 15 days, each participant repeated the same assessment in the opposite mode. Finally, participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>114 participants were initially enrolled in the study and 100 individuals performed both face-to-face and remote assessments (14 dropouts). All neuropsychological tests showed agreement between the two modes of administration, except for the Digit Span Forward (<i>p </i>= 0.009) and oral-Symbol Digit Modalities Test (<i>p </i>< 0.001). According to Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCCs), tests also showed good or excellent reliability (LCCCs between 0.609 and 0.964); only the Digit Span Backward and the Stroop test showed moderate reliability (LCCCs =0.514-0.441, respectively). Among 100 participants, 65 patients answered the satisfaction questionnaire, declaring high satisfaction for the remote evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tele-neuropsychology seems to work with in-home assessments among Italian patients with cognitive disorders and seems to be acceptable to them.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong><i>ClinicalTrials.gov</i>, Identifier: NCT06078332 (October 17, 2023).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"268-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241300186\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241300186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程神经心理学已经被用于神经认知障碍,然而,在意大利,其心理测量质量和满意度的证据仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在:(1)与传统的面对面管理相比,评估通过视频会议在家中对意大利认知障碍患者样本进行标准化神经心理学筛查和领域特异性测试的可靠性;(2)评估远程管理的可行性和满意度。方法:本交叉研究纳入了主观认知障碍、轻度神经认知障碍或痴呆患者。所有参与者都以面对面或远程方式进行了简短的神经心理学筛查评估。轻度认知障碍患者(Mini-Mental State Examination≥20)也进行了扩展神经心理学测试。15天后,每个参与者在相反的模式下重复同样的评估。最后,参与者完成了一份满意度问卷。结果:114名参与者最初参加了研究,100人进行了面对面和远程评估(14人退出)。所有的神经心理学测试都显示了两种给药法之间的一致性,除了数字跨距前伸测试(p = 0.009)和口腔符号数字模式测试(p)。结论:远程神经心理学似乎在意大利认知障碍患者的家庭评估中起作用,并且似乎为他们所接受。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT06078332(2023年10月17日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tele-neuropsychological multidomain assessment in Italian people with cognitive disorders: Reliability and user satisfaction.

Background: Tele-neuropsychology has already been employed in neurocognitive disorders, however, in Italy, the evidence of its psychometric quality and satisfaction is still limited.

Objective: This study aimed to: (1) evaluate the reliability of a standardized battery of neuropsychological screening and domain-specific tests delivered at home via videoconference to a sample of Italian people with cognitive disorders, compared with traditional face-to-face administration; (2) assess the feasibility and satisfaction about remote administration.

Methods: This crossover study enrolled patients with subjective cognitive disorder, mild neurocognitive disorder, or dementia. All participants performed a brief neuropsychological screening assessment in face-to-face or remote mode. People with milder cognitive disorders (Mini-Mental State Examination ≥ 20) also performed an extended neuropsychological battery. After 15 days, each participant repeated the same assessment in the opposite mode. Finally, participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire.

Results: 114 participants were initially enrolled in the study and 100 individuals performed both face-to-face and remote assessments (14 dropouts). All neuropsychological tests showed agreement between the two modes of administration, except for the Digit Span Forward (p = 0.009) and oral-Symbol Digit Modalities Test (p < 0.001). According to Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCCs), tests also showed good or excellent reliability (LCCCs between 0.609 and 0.964); only the Digit Span Backward and the Stroop test showed moderate reliability (LCCCs =0.514-0.441, respectively). Among 100 participants, 65 patients answered the satisfaction questionnaire, declaring high satisfaction for the remote evaluation.

Conclusions: Tele-neuropsychology seems to work with in-home assessments among Italian patients with cognitive disorders and seems to be acceptable to them.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT06078332 (October 17, 2023).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信