Julia J Eijsink, Jaimy A Simmering, Manon Perik, Annemarie van der Steen, Anique T M Grob
{"title":"前阴道破裂的影响:一项比较POP-Q和直立MRI的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Julia J Eijsink, Jaimy A Simmering, Manon Perik, Annemarie van der Steen, Anique T M Grob","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-06006-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The high recurrence rate (up to 40%) of native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is concerning and a better understanding of the effect of surgery is essential in optimizing treatment. As physical examination (Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification, POP-Q) underestimates the degree of prolapse, upright assessment may provide new insights. Therefore, we compared supine POP-Q with upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination of the anatomical effect of native tissue POP surgery on the pelvic anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 59 women with stage ≥ 2 anterior compartment prolapse undergoing solely anterior colporrhaphy (AC) or in combination with posterior colporrhaphy (PC), sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) or Manchester Fothergill (MF). Preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, anatomical measurements were obtained: POP-Q and upright MRI. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire was completed 6 weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant lift of the lowest point of the bladder was observed on both POP-Q (37 ± 18 mm) and upright MRI (26 ± 22 mm), which was 10 ± 17 mm (p < 0.001) larger on POP-Q than on upright MRI. Symptomatic improvement (PGI-I) was reported by 93.2% of the patients, which showed a weak correlation with the bladder lift on upright MRI (Spearman's ρ -0.301, p = 0.021), but no correlation with the bladder lift on POP-Q (Spearman's ρ -0.078, p = 0.565).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POP-Q examination overestimates the anatomical result of native tissue POP repair on the anterior vaginal wall by 1 cm compared with upright MRI examination upon 6 weeks' follow-up. Upright MRI examination is suggested to relate better to symptomatic outcome than does POP-Q examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"403-412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Anterior Colporrhaphy: A Prospective Study Comparing POP-Q and Upright MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Julia J Eijsink, Jaimy A Simmering, Manon Perik, Annemarie van der Steen, Anique T M Grob\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-024-06006-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The high recurrence rate (up to 40%) of native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is concerning and a better understanding of the effect of surgery is essential in optimizing treatment. As physical examination (Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification, POP-Q) underestimates the degree of prolapse, upright assessment may provide new insights. Therefore, we compared supine POP-Q with upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination of the anatomical effect of native tissue POP surgery on the pelvic anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 59 women with stage ≥ 2 anterior compartment prolapse undergoing solely anterior colporrhaphy (AC) or in combination with posterior colporrhaphy (PC), sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) or Manchester Fothergill (MF). Preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, anatomical measurements were obtained: POP-Q and upright MRI. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire was completed 6 weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant lift of the lowest point of the bladder was observed on both POP-Q (37 ± 18 mm) and upright MRI (26 ± 22 mm), which was 10 ± 17 mm (p < 0.001) larger on POP-Q than on upright MRI. Symptomatic improvement (PGI-I) was reported by 93.2% of the patients, which showed a weak correlation with the bladder lift on upright MRI (Spearman's ρ -0.301, p = 0.021), but no correlation with the bladder lift on POP-Q (Spearman's ρ -0.078, p = 0.565).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POP-Q examination overestimates the anatomical result of native tissue POP repair on the anterior vaginal wall by 1 cm compared with upright MRI examination upon 6 weeks' follow-up. Upright MRI examination is suggested to relate better to symptomatic outcome than does POP-Q examination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"403-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-06006-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-06006-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前言和假设:盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的自体组织手术的高复发率(高达40%)令人担忧,更好地了解手术效果对优化治疗至关重要。由于体格检查(盆腔器官脱垂定量,POP-Q)低估了脱垂的程度,直立评估可能提供新的见解。因此,我们比较了仰卧位POP- q和直立位的磁共振成像(MRI)检查对骨盆解剖的解剖影响。方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了59名≥2期前房室脱垂的女性,她们接受了单纯的前阴道破裂术(AC)或联合后阴道破裂术(PC)、骶棘性子宫固定术(SSH)或Manchester Fothergill术(MF)。术前和术后6周进行解剖测量:POP-Q和直立MRI。术后6周完成患者整体改善印象(PGI-I)问卷。结果:POP- q检查膀胱最低点明显升高(37±18 mm),直立MRI检查膀胱最低点明显升高(26±22 mm),为10±17 mm (p)。结论:随访6周,与直立MRI检查相比,POP- q检查阴道前壁天然组织POP修复的解剖结果高估了1 cm。直立MRI检查比POP-Q检查更能反映症状。
The Effect of Anterior Colporrhaphy: A Prospective Study Comparing POP-Q and Upright MRI.
Introduction and hypothesis: The high recurrence rate (up to 40%) of native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is concerning and a better understanding of the effect of surgery is essential in optimizing treatment. As physical examination (Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification, POP-Q) underestimates the degree of prolapse, upright assessment may provide new insights. Therefore, we compared supine POP-Q with upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination of the anatomical effect of native tissue POP surgery on the pelvic anatomy.
Methods: This prospective study included 59 women with stage ≥ 2 anterior compartment prolapse undergoing solely anterior colporrhaphy (AC) or in combination with posterior colporrhaphy (PC), sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) or Manchester Fothergill (MF). Preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, anatomical measurements were obtained: POP-Q and upright MRI. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire was completed 6 weeks postoperatively.
Results: Significant lift of the lowest point of the bladder was observed on both POP-Q (37 ± 18 mm) and upright MRI (26 ± 22 mm), which was 10 ± 17 mm (p < 0.001) larger on POP-Q than on upright MRI. Symptomatic improvement (PGI-I) was reported by 93.2% of the patients, which showed a weak correlation with the bladder lift on upright MRI (Spearman's ρ -0.301, p = 0.021), but no correlation with the bladder lift on POP-Q (Spearman's ρ -0.078, p = 0.565).
Conclusions: The POP-Q examination overestimates the anatomical result of native tissue POP repair on the anterior vaginal wall by 1 cm compared with upright MRI examination upon 6 weeks' follow-up. Upright MRI examination is suggested to relate better to symptomatic outcome than does POP-Q examination.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion