IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Omar Elkoumi, Ahmed Elkoumi, Mariam Khaled Elbairy, Hamza Irfan, Ahmad Beddor, Mostafa Adel T Mahmoud, Omar K Habib, Nada Ibrahim Hendi, Ayah Abdulgadir, Bandar Alawlaqi, Sarah Hamed, Ahmed K Ghanem
{"title":"Comparison between the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers and their combination on mortality in maintenance dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Omar Elkoumi, Ahmed Elkoumi, Mariam Khaled Elbairy, Hamza Irfan, Ahmad Beddor, Mostafa Adel T Mahmoud, Omar K Habib, Nada Ibrahim Hendi, Ayah Abdulgadir, Bandar Alawlaqi, Sarah Hamed, Ahmed K Ghanem","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04322-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients undergoing maintenance dialysis have a higher mortality rate compared to the general population. It is known that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have protective effects on the kidney; however, few studies have directly compared their impact on mortality in patients undergoing dialysis. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ACEIs, ARBs, or their combination in reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in maintenance dialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus databases from inception until August 23rd, 2024. We included all observational studies and clinical trials that assessed the effectiveness of ACEIs versus ARBs or their combination on mortality outcomes, in patients with CKD on maintenance dialysis. We used Review Manager 5.4 for all statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five observational studies, including 126,612 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. Among all patients, no statistically significant difference was found between ACEIs and ARBs in reducing all-cause mortality (RR: 1.12, 95% CI [0.98, 1.27], P = 0.10) or cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.10, 95% CI [0.92, 1.33], P = 0.30). In patients on hemodialysis, ARBs were associated with a statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality (P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest no differences between ACEIs and ARBs in reducing all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in maintenance dialysis patients. However, ARBs may reduce cardiovascular mortality more effectively in hemodialysis patients. Conducting randomized controlled clinical trials to validate our results is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04322-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介与普通人群相比,接受维持性透析的患者死亡率较高。众所周知,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)对肾脏有保护作用;但很少有研究直接比较它们对透析患者死亡率的影响。本研究旨在评估 ACEIs、ARBs 或它们的组合在降低维持性透析患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率方面的效果:我们对 PubMed、Cochrane Central、Web of Science (WOS) 和 Scopus 数据库进行了系统检索,检索时间从开始到 2024 年 8 月 23 日。我们纳入了所有评估ACEIs与ARBs或其组合对维持性透析的CKD患者死亡率结果的有效性的观察性研究和临床试验。我们使用Review Manager 5.4进行了所有统计分析:五项观察性研究(包括 126,612 名患者)符合资格标准,并被纳入最终分析。在所有患者中,发现 ACEIs 和 ARBs 在降低全因死亡率(RR:1.12,95% CI [0.98,1.27],P = 0.10)或心血管死亡率(RR:1.10,95% CI [0.92,1.33],P = 0.30)方面无统计学差异。在接受血液透析的患者中,ARB 可显著降低心血管死亡率(P我们的研究结果表明,ACEIs 和 ARBs 在降低维持性透析患者的全因死亡率或心血管死亡率方面没有差异。然而,ARBs 可更有效地降低血液透析患者的心血管死亡率。有必要进行随机对照临床试验来验证我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers and their combination on mortality in maintenance dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Patients undergoing maintenance dialysis have a higher mortality rate compared to the general population. It is known that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have protective effects on the kidney; however, few studies have directly compared their impact on mortality in patients undergoing dialysis. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ACEIs, ARBs, or their combination in reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in maintenance dialysis patients.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus databases from inception until August 23rd, 2024. We included all observational studies and clinical trials that assessed the effectiveness of ACEIs versus ARBs or their combination on mortality outcomes, in patients with CKD on maintenance dialysis. We used Review Manager 5.4 for all statistical analyses.

Results: Five observational studies, including 126,612 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. Among all patients, no statistically significant difference was found between ACEIs and ARBs in reducing all-cause mortality (RR: 1.12, 95% CI [0.98, 1.27], P = 0.10) or cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.10, 95% CI [0.92, 1.33], P = 0.30). In patients on hemodialysis, ARBs were associated with a statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Our results suggest no differences between ACEIs and ARBs in reducing all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in maintenance dialysis patients. However, ARBs may reduce cardiovascular mortality more effectively in hemodialysis patients. Conducting randomized controlled clinical trials to validate our results is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信