Rebecca Habisch, Peter Neubauer, Jorge Soza-Ried, Eva Puschmann
{"title":"重复收获可以有效地生产VSV-GP。","authors":"Rebecca Habisch, Peter Neubauer, Jorge Soza-Ried, Eva Puschmann","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2024.1505338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Viral products keep gaining importance in multiple therapeutic fields. Considering the scale and production slot limitations, optimizing the outcome of every manufacturing batch is essential to minimize costs and make this therapeutic modality broadly available to patients. Most manufacturing processes for oncolytic viruses currently in clinical studies are based on a batch process. Here, we evaluated the benefits in terms of titer increase of a repeated harvest approach and compared it to the classical batch production process. While no effect on cell density was observed, the cumulated infectious titer following repeated harvest was over 400 times higher than the evaluated batch process yield. This shows that repeated harvests or perfusion have the potential to boost viral yields and should be considered when deciding on a process format for production.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"12 ","pages":"1505338"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeated harvest enables efficient production of VSV-GP.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Habisch, Peter Neubauer, Jorge Soza-Ried, Eva Puschmann\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbioe.2024.1505338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Viral products keep gaining importance in multiple therapeutic fields. Considering the scale and production slot limitations, optimizing the outcome of every manufacturing batch is essential to minimize costs and make this therapeutic modality broadly available to patients. Most manufacturing processes for oncolytic viruses currently in clinical studies are based on a batch process. Here, we evaluated the benefits in terms of titer increase of a repeated harvest approach and compared it to the classical batch production process. While no effect on cell density was observed, the cumulated infectious titer following repeated harvest was over 400 times higher than the evaluated batch process yield. This shows that repeated harvests or perfusion have the potential to boost viral yields and should be considered when deciding on a process format for production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1505338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1505338\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1505338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Repeated harvest enables efficient production of VSV-GP.
Viral products keep gaining importance in multiple therapeutic fields. Considering the scale and production slot limitations, optimizing the outcome of every manufacturing batch is essential to minimize costs and make this therapeutic modality broadly available to patients. Most manufacturing processes for oncolytic viruses currently in clinical studies are based on a batch process. Here, we evaluated the benefits in terms of titer increase of a repeated harvest approach and compared it to the classical batch production process. While no effect on cell density was observed, the cumulated infectious titer following repeated harvest was over 400 times higher than the evaluated batch process yield. This shows that repeated harvests or perfusion have the potential to boost viral yields and should be considered when deciding on a process format for production.
期刊介绍:
The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs.
In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.