Joanna Aldoori, Michael A Zulyniak, Giles J Toogood, Mark A Hull
{"title":"英国生物库中的血浆 n-3 多不饱和脂肪酸水平与结直肠癌风险:非线性以及肿瘤部位和性别特异性的证据。","authors":"Joanna Aldoori, Michael A Zulyniak, Giles J Toogood, Mark A Hull","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) intake and colorectal cancer risk is unclear. Blood n-3 PUFA concentration is a biomarker of dietary n-3 PUFA intake. We examined the relationship between plasma n-3 PUFA concentrations and colorectal cancer risk in UK Biobank (UKBB) participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the relationship between tertiles (T) of plasma total n-3 PUFAs and n-3 PUFA docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels, and overall colorectal cancer (also stratified by tumor location and sex) risk. Cox proportional hazards regression models were adjusted for clinical covariates. Nonlinearity was tested by restricted cubic splines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2,602 incident colorectal cancer cases in 234,598 UKBB participants with baseline plasma fatty acid data (mean follow-up 13.4 years). There was an inverse association between the plasma total n-3 PUFA level [T2 HR = 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.97) compared with the T1 reference; T3 = 0.91 (0.83-1.00)], as well as the plasma DHA concentration [T2 = 0.89 (0.80-0.98); T3 = 0.91 (0.82-1.00)], and colorectal cancer risk. The relationship was nonlinear [P for nonlinearity = 0.14 (total n-3 PUFAs) and 0.008 (DHA)], with a plateau effect at the highest n-3 PUFA concentrations. The relationship was more pronounced for proximal colon cancer [T2 = 0.82 (0.69-0.97); T3 = 0.76 (0.64-0.90) for DHA] and was evident for males [T2 = 0.84 (0.74-0.95); T3 = 0.89 (0.78-1.00)], but not for females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher plasma n-3 PUFAs are associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk in the UKBB.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Nonlinearity, as well as tumor site and sex specificities, of the inverse relationship between plasma n-3 PUFA levels and colorectal cancer risk, if confirmed in other diverse populations, has significant implications for nutritional prevention guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"394-404"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Levels and Colorectal Cancer Risk in the UK Biobank: Evidence of Nonlinearity, as Well as Tumor Site- and Sex-Specificity.\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Aldoori, Michael A Zulyniak, Giles J Toogood, Mark A Hull\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) intake and colorectal cancer risk is unclear. Blood n-3 PUFA concentration is a biomarker of dietary n-3 PUFA intake. We examined the relationship between plasma n-3 PUFA concentrations and colorectal cancer risk in UK Biobank (UKBB) participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the relationship between tertiles (T) of plasma total n-3 PUFAs and n-3 PUFA docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels, and overall colorectal cancer (also stratified by tumor location and sex) risk. Cox proportional hazards regression models were adjusted for clinical covariates. Nonlinearity was tested by restricted cubic splines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2,602 incident colorectal cancer cases in 234,598 UKBB participants with baseline plasma fatty acid data (mean follow-up 13.4 years). There was an inverse association between the plasma total n-3 PUFA level [T2 HR = 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.97) compared with the T1 reference; T3 = 0.91 (0.83-1.00)], as well as the plasma DHA concentration [T2 = 0.89 (0.80-0.98); T3 = 0.91 (0.82-1.00)], and colorectal cancer risk. The relationship was nonlinear [P for nonlinearity = 0.14 (total n-3 PUFAs) and 0.008 (DHA)], with a plateau effect at the highest n-3 PUFA concentrations. The relationship was more pronounced for proximal colon cancer [T2 = 0.82 (0.69-0.97); T3 = 0.76 (0.64-0.90) for DHA] and was evident for males [T2 = 0.84 (0.74-0.95); T3 = 0.89 (0.78-1.00)], but not for females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher plasma n-3 PUFAs are associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk in the UKBB.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Nonlinearity, as well as tumor site and sex specificities, of the inverse relationship between plasma n-3 PUFA levels and colorectal cancer risk, if confirmed in other diverse populations, has significant implications for nutritional prevention guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"394-404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Plasma n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Levels and Colorectal Cancer Risk in the UK Biobank: Evidence of Nonlinearity, as Well as Tumor Site- and Sex-Specificity.
Background: The relationship between omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) intake and colorectal cancer risk is unclear. Blood n-3 PUFA concentration is a biomarker of dietary n-3 PUFA intake. We examined the relationship between plasma n-3 PUFA concentrations and colorectal cancer risk in UK Biobank (UKBB) participants.
Methods: We analyzed the relationship between tertiles (T) of plasma total n-3 PUFAs and n-3 PUFA docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels, and overall colorectal cancer (also stratified by tumor location and sex) risk. Cox proportional hazards regression models were adjusted for clinical covariates. Nonlinearity was tested by restricted cubic splines.
Results: There were 2,602 incident colorectal cancer cases in 234,598 UKBB participants with baseline plasma fatty acid data (mean follow-up 13.4 years). There was an inverse association between the plasma total n-3 PUFA level [T2 HR = 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.97) compared with the T1 reference; T3 = 0.91 (0.83-1.00)], as well as the plasma DHA concentration [T2 = 0.89 (0.80-0.98); T3 = 0.91 (0.82-1.00)], and colorectal cancer risk. The relationship was nonlinear [P for nonlinearity = 0.14 (total n-3 PUFAs) and 0.008 (DHA)], with a plateau effect at the highest n-3 PUFA concentrations. The relationship was more pronounced for proximal colon cancer [T2 = 0.82 (0.69-0.97); T3 = 0.76 (0.64-0.90) for DHA] and was evident for males [T2 = 0.84 (0.74-0.95); T3 = 0.89 (0.78-1.00)], but not for females.
Conclusions: Higher plasma n-3 PUFAs are associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk in the UKBB.
Impact: Nonlinearity, as well as tumor site and sex specificities, of the inverse relationship between plasma n-3 PUFA levels and colorectal cancer risk, if confirmed in other diverse populations, has significant implications for nutritional prevention guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.