前列腺癌部分或局部近距离放射治疗:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Enrique Gutiérrez-Valencia, Inmaculada Navarro-Domenech, Kailee Zhou, Marc Barcelona, Rouhi Fazelzad, Matthew Ramotar, Irving Sanchez, Victor Ruiz, Robert Weersink, Rachel Glicksman, Joelle Helou, Alejandro Berlin, Peter Chung, Ronald Chow, Srinivas Raman
{"title":"前列腺癌部分或局部近距离放射治疗:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Enrique Gutiérrez-Valencia, Inmaculada Navarro-Domenech, Kailee Zhou, Marc Barcelona, Rouhi Fazelzad, Matthew Ramotar, Irving Sanchez, Victor Ruiz, Robert Weersink, Rachel Glicksman, Joelle Helou, Alejandro Berlin, Peter Chung, Ronald Chow, Srinivas Raman","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recent advances in image-guided brachytherapy have allowed for treatment volume reduction in the treatment of prostate cancer, with the aim to optimize disease control and reduce toxicities. This systematic review reports on the efficacy and safety of focal brachytherapy for treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched from inception to July 2023. Studies were included if they reported on focal brachytherapy, and described either dosimetry or clinical outcomes in the monotherapy or salvage setting. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate biochemical control (BC) at 12-60 months. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022320921).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies reporting on 1492 patients were included in this review. Fourteen studies reported on monotherapy, 10 on salvage, and two on boost. The majority of studies used MRI and/or biopsy or PET for target identification, and MRI fusion and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for image guidance technique. BC for monotherapy was 97% (95% CI: 86%-99%) at 24 months and 82% (95% CI: 65%-92%) at 60 months. BC for salvage was 67% (95% CI: 62%-72%) at 24 months and 35% (95% CI: 17%-58%) at 60 months. Low rates of toxicity were reported across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Focal brachytherapy has promising efficacy and safety profiles. Future studies may compare focal brachytherapy to whole-gland treatments, to investigate relative efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>In well-selected patients, partial or focal brachytherapy represents an evidence-based option with acceptable BC rates and a favourable toxicity profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"354-367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial or focal brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Gutiérrez-Valencia, Inmaculada Navarro-Domenech, Kailee Zhou, Marc Barcelona, Rouhi Fazelzad, Matthew Ramotar, Irving Sanchez, Victor Ruiz, Robert Weersink, Rachel Glicksman, Joelle Helou, Alejandro Berlin, Peter Chung, Ronald Chow, Srinivas Raman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqae254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recent advances in image-guided brachytherapy have allowed for treatment volume reduction in the treatment of prostate cancer, with the aim to optimize disease control and reduce toxicities. This systematic review reports on the efficacy and safety of focal brachytherapy for treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched from inception to July 2023. Studies were included if they reported on focal brachytherapy, and described either dosimetry or clinical outcomes in the monotherapy or salvage setting. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate biochemical control (BC) at 12-60 months. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022320921).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies reporting on 1492 patients were included in this review. Fourteen studies reported on monotherapy, 10 on salvage, and two on boost. The majority of studies used MRI and/or biopsy or PET for target identification, and MRI fusion and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for image guidance technique. BC for monotherapy was 97% (95% CI: 86%-99%) at 24 months and 82% (95% CI: 65%-92%) at 60 months. BC for salvage was 67% (95% CI: 62%-72%) at 24 months and 35% (95% CI: 17%-58%) at 60 months. Low rates of toxicity were reported across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Focal brachytherapy has promising efficacy and safety profiles. Future studies may compare focal brachytherapy to whole-gland treatments, to investigate relative efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>In well-selected patients, partial or focal brachytherapy represents an evidence-based option with acceptable BC rates and a favourable toxicity profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"354-367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840170/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae254\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:图像引导近距离放射治疗的最新进展使得前列腺癌治疗的治疗量减少,目的是优化疾病控制和减少毒性。本系统综述报道局灶性近距离放射治疗局限性前列腺癌的疗效和安全性。方法:检索Medline、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane,检索时间为建站至2023年7月。如果研究报告了局灶性近距离放疗,并描述了单药治疗或抢救治疗的剂量学或临床结果,则纳入研究。meta分析评估12-60个月的生化控制(BC)。该审查方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42022320921)。结果:26项研究共纳入1492例患者。14项研究报告了单药治疗,10项研究报告了挽救治疗,2项研究报告了强化治疗。大多数研究使用MRI和/或活检或PET进行靶标识别,MRI融合和经直肠超声(TRUS)作为图像引导技术。单一疗法的BC在24个月时为97% (95%CI: 86-99%),在60个月时为82% (95%CI: 65-92%)。24个月时挽救的BC为67% (95%CI: 62-72%), 60个月时为35% (95%CI: 17-58%)。所有研究都报告了低毒性率。结论:局灶性近距离放射治疗具有良好的疗效和安全性。未来的研究可能会比较局灶性近距离放疗与全腺体治疗,以研究相对的疗效和安全性。知识进展:在精心挑选的患者中,局部或局灶性近距离放疗是一种循证选择,具有可接受的BC率和有利的毒性特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partial or focal brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: Recent advances in image-guided brachytherapy have allowed for treatment volume reduction in the treatment of prostate cancer, with the aim to optimize disease control and reduce toxicities. This systematic review reports on the efficacy and safety of focal brachytherapy for treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer.

Methods: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched from inception to July 2023. Studies were included if they reported on focal brachytherapy, and described either dosimetry or clinical outcomes in the monotherapy or salvage setting. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate biochemical control (BC) at 12-60 months. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022320921).

Results: Twenty-six studies reporting on 1492 patients were included in this review. Fourteen studies reported on monotherapy, 10 on salvage, and two on boost. The majority of studies used MRI and/or biopsy or PET for target identification, and MRI fusion and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for image guidance technique. BC for monotherapy was 97% (95% CI: 86%-99%) at 24 months and 82% (95% CI: 65%-92%) at 60 months. BC for salvage was 67% (95% CI: 62%-72%) at 24 months and 35% (95% CI: 17%-58%) at 60 months. Low rates of toxicity were reported across studies.

Conclusions: Focal brachytherapy has promising efficacy and safety profiles. Future studies may compare focal brachytherapy to whole-gland treatments, to investigate relative efficacy and safety.

Advances in knowledge: In well-selected patients, partial or focal brachytherapy represents an evidence-based option with acceptable BC rates and a favourable toxicity profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信