眼动仪校准:人类能多好地重新定位目标?

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Ignace T C Hooge, Roy S Hessels, Diederick C Niehorster, Richard Andersson, Marta K Skrok, Robert Konklewski, Patrycjusz Stremplewski, Maciej Nowakowski, Szymon Tamborski, Anna Szkulmowska, Maciej Szkulmowski, Marcus Nyström
{"title":"眼动仪校准:人类能多好地重新定位目标?","authors":"Ignace T C Hooge, Roy S Hessels, Diederick C Niehorster, Richard Andersson, Marta K Skrok, Robert Konklewski, Patrycjusz Stremplewski, Maciej Nowakowski, Szymon Tamborski, Anna Szkulmowska, Maciej Szkulmowski, Marcus Nyström","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> . This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA's influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans' precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye tracker calibration: How well can humans refixate a target?\",\"authors\":\"Ignace T C Hooge, Roy S Hessels, Diederick C Niehorster, Richard Andersson, Marta K Skrok, Robert Konklewski, Patrycjusz Stremplewski, Maciej Nowakowski, Szymon Tamborski, Anna Szkulmowska, Maciej Szkulmowski, Marcus Nyström\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> . This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA's influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans' precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不管精度如何,瞳孔眼动仪的误差约为0.5°。本文探讨了两个可能增加凝视信号不准确性的因素,即:1)瞳孔大小变化和瞳孔大小伪影(PSA); 2)经验丰富的个体无法精确地重新定位视觉目标。实验1使用传统的瞳孔- cr眼动仪,而实验2使用视网膜眼动仪,即FreezeEye眼动仪,消除了瞳孔估计。结果显示,PSA会显著影响注视精度,在校准和验证过程中造成最多0.5°的误差。基于瞳孔大小和明显凝视位移之间关系的校正大大减少了不准确性,强调了PSA对眼球追踪质量的影响。相反,实验2证明了人类精确的注视能力,表明凝视信号的准确性不受人类注视不一致性的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eye tracker calibration: How well can humans refixate a target?

Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5 . This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5 inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA's influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans' precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信