{"title":"硬膜外注射治疗腰椎管狭窄症及延迟椎板切除术的疗效及相关因素:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Yara Bou Sleiman, Souheil Hallit, Souheil Chamandi","doi":"10.6859/aja.202403_62(1).0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar epidural injections have been studied as symptomatic treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, results about their efficacy have been controversial, and data regarding their use is scarce. Our purpose in this article is to study the efficacy of epidural injections in the management of pain and disability in patients suffering from spinal stenosis, to study the factors which can affect their efficacy, and to discuss whether they could replace surgery or not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study between 2021 and 2022 took place in a Pain Clinic located in Notre-Dame des Secours University Hospital-Lebanon. The study was done on 128 patients, of whom 18 were excluded because they underwent laminectomy before taking the transforaminal lumbar epidural injections. Medical records were viewed. Outcome measures were checked before and after epidural injections using the numerical pain scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scale. Physical activity was assessed with a physical activity index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Back pain scores (9.46 ± 1.07 vs. 3.91 ± 3.13; P < 0.001), leg pain scores (9.31 ± 1.41 vs. 3.75 ± 3.17; P < 0.001), and ODI scores (27.45 ± 8.97 vs. 9.40 ± 9.42; P < 0.001) decreased after the injection compared to before it. A higher physical activity index was significantly associated with a decrease in back pain, leg pain, and ODI scores after epidural injection. In 57.8% of the patients, epidural injections were sufficient for pain management without the need for surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epidural injections are effective in the management of back and leg pain associated with LSS and in improving patients' disability. Engaging in activities like walking and swimming is associated with better results. In some cases, epidural injections may replace surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":"62 1","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy and Factors Associated With Epidural Injections in the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and in Terms of Delaying Laminectomy: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yara Bou Sleiman, Souheil Hallit, Souheil Chamandi\",\"doi\":\"10.6859/aja.202403_62(1).0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar epidural injections have been studied as symptomatic treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, results about their efficacy have been controversial, and data regarding their use is scarce. Our purpose in this article is to study the efficacy of epidural injections in the management of pain and disability in patients suffering from spinal stenosis, to study the factors which can affect their efficacy, and to discuss whether they could replace surgery or not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study between 2021 and 2022 took place in a Pain Clinic located in Notre-Dame des Secours University Hospital-Lebanon. The study was done on 128 patients, of whom 18 were excluded because they underwent laminectomy before taking the transforaminal lumbar epidural injections. Medical records were viewed. Outcome measures were checked before and after epidural injections using the numerical pain scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scale. Physical activity was assessed with a physical activity index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Back pain scores (9.46 ± 1.07 vs. 3.91 ± 3.13; P < 0.001), leg pain scores (9.31 ± 1.41 vs. 3.75 ± 3.17; P < 0.001), and ODI scores (27.45 ± 8.97 vs. 9.40 ± 9.42; P < 0.001) decreased after the injection compared to before it. A higher physical activity index was significantly associated with a decrease in back pain, leg pain, and ODI scores after epidural injection. In 57.8% of the patients, epidural injections were sufficient for pain management without the need for surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epidural injections are effective in the management of back and leg pain associated with LSS and in improving patients' disability. Engaging in activities like walking and swimming is associated with better results. In some cases, epidural injections may replace surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"39-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202403_62(1).0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202403_62(1).0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腰椎硬膜外注射作为腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的对症治疗已被研究。然而,关于其疗效的结果一直存在争议,并且关于其使用的数据很少。我们的目的是研究硬膜外注射治疗椎管狭窄患者疼痛和残疾的疗效,研究影响其疗效的因素,并探讨其是否可以替代手术。方法:在黎巴嫩Notre-Dame des Secours大学医院的疼痛诊所进行了2021年至2022年的回顾性研究。该研究对128名患者进行了研究,其中18人被排除在外,因为他们在接受经椎间孔腰椎硬膜外注射前接受了椎板切除术。查看了医疗记录。采用数值疼痛量表和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)量表检查硬膜外注射前后的结局指标。用身体活动指数评估身体活动。结果:腰痛评分(9.46±1.07∶3.91±3.13);P < 0.001),腿痛评分(9.31±1.41∶3.75±3.17;P < 0.001), ODI评分(27.45±8.97∶9.40±9.42;P < 0.001),与注射前相比,注射后明显降低。较高的体力活动指数与硬膜外注射后背部疼痛、腿部疼痛和ODI评分的减少显著相关。在57.8%的患者中,硬膜外注射足以缓解疼痛,无需手术。结论:硬膜外注射可有效治疗LSS相关的腰、下肢疼痛,改善患者的残疾。参与像散步和游泳这样的活动与更好的结果有关。在某些情况下,硬膜外注射可以代替手术。
The Efficacy and Factors Associated With Epidural Injections in the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and in Terms of Delaying Laminectomy: A Retrospective Study.
Background: Lumbar epidural injections have been studied as symptomatic treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, results about their efficacy have been controversial, and data regarding their use is scarce. Our purpose in this article is to study the efficacy of epidural injections in the management of pain and disability in patients suffering from spinal stenosis, to study the factors which can affect their efficacy, and to discuss whether they could replace surgery or not.
Methods: A retrospective study between 2021 and 2022 took place in a Pain Clinic located in Notre-Dame des Secours University Hospital-Lebanon. The study was done on 128 patients, of whom 18 were excluded because they underwent laminectomy before taking the transforaminal lumbar epidural injections. Medical records were viewed. Outcome measures were checked before and after epidural injections using the numerical pain scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scale. Physical activity was assessed with a physical activity index.
Results: Back pain scores (9.46 ± 1.07 vs. 3.91 ± 3.13; P < 0.001), leg pain scores (9.31 ± 1.41 vs. 3.75 ± 3.17; P < 0.001), and ODI scores (27.45 ± 8.97 vs. 9.40 ± 9.42; P < 0.001) decreased after the injection compared to before it. A higher physical activity index was significantly associated with a decrease in back pain, leg pain, and ODI scores after epidural injection. In 57.8% of the patients, epidural injections were sufficient for pain management without the need for surgery.
Conclusion: Epidural injections are effective in the management of back and leg pain associated with LSS and in improving patients' disability. Engaging in activities like walking and swimming is associated with better results. In some cases, epidural injections may replace surgery.
期刊介绍:
Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.