通过流体-结构相互作用模型对中心血压进行无创估算。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Peishuo Wu, Chi Zhu
{"title":"通过流体-结构相互作用模型对中心血压进行无创估算。","authors":"Peishuo Wu,&nbsp;Chi Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s10237-024-01916-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Central blood pressure (cBP) is considered a superior indicator of cardiovascular fitness than brachial blood pressure (bBP). Even though bBP is easy to measure noninvasively, it is usually higher than cBP due to pulse wave amplification, characterized by the gradual increase in peak systolic pressure during pulse wave propagation. In this study, we aim to develop an individualized transfer function that can accurately estimate cBP from bBP. We first construct a three-dimensional, patient-specific model of the upper limb arterial system using fluid–structure interaction simulations, incorporating variable material properties and complex boundary conditions. Then, we develop an analytical brachial-aortic transfer function based on novel solutions for compliant vessels. The accuracy of this transfer function is successfully validated against numerical simulation results, which effectively reproduce pulse wave propagation and amplification, with key hemodynamic parameters falling within the range of clinical measurements. Further analysis of the transfer function reveals that cBP is a linear combination of bBP and aortic flow rate in the frequency domain, with the coefficients determined by vessel geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions. Additionally, bBP primarily contributes to the steady component of cBP, while the aortic flow rate is responsible for the pulsatile component. Furthermore, local sensitivity analysis indicates that the lumen radius is the most influential parameter in accurately estimating cBP. Although not directly applicable clinically, the proposed transfer function enhances understanding of the underlying physics—highlighting the importance of aortic flow and lumen radius—and can guide the development of more practical transfer functions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":"24 2","pages":"423 - 439"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure through fluid–structure interaction modeling\",\"authors\":\"Peishuo Wu,&nbsp;Chi Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10237-024-01916-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Central blood pressure (cBP) is considered a superior indicator of cardiovascular fitness than brachial blood pressure (bBP). Even though bBP is easy to measure noninvasively, it is usually higher than cBP due to pulse wave amplification, characterized by the gradual increase in peak systolic pressure during pulse wave propagation. In this study, we aim to develop an individualized transfer function that can accurately estimate cBP from bBP. We first construct a three-dimensional, patient-specific model of the upper limb arterial system using fluid–structure interaction simulations, incorporating variable material properties and complex boundary conditions. Then, we develop an analytical brachial-aortic transfer function based on novel solutions for compliant vessels. The accuracy of this transfer function is successfully validated against numerical simulation results, which effectively reproduce pulse wave propagation and amplification, with key hemodynamic parameters falling within the range of clinical measurements. Further analysis of the transfer function reveals that cBP is a linear combination of bBP and aortic flow rate in the frequency domain, with the coefficients determined by vessel geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions. Additionally, bBP primarily contributes to the steady component of cBP, while the aortic flow rate is responsible for the pulsatile component. Furthermore, local sensitivity analysis indicates that the lumen radius is the most influential parameter in accurately estimating cBP. Although not directly applicable clinically, the proposed transfer function enhances understanding of the underlying physics—highlighting the importance of aortic flow and lumen radius—and can guide the development of more practical transfer functions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"423 - 439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10237-024-01916-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10237-024-01916-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中枢血压(cBP)被认为是比肱血压(bBP)更好的心血管健康指标。尽管bBP很容易无创测量,但由于脉搏波的放大,其通常高于cBP,其特征是在脉搏波传播过程中收缩压峰值逐渐升高。在这项研究中,我们的目标是开发一个个性化的传递函数,可以准确地从bBP估计cBP。我们首先利用流体-结构相互作用模拟,结合可变材料特性和复杂边界条件,构建了上肢动脉系统的三维、患者特异性模型。然后,我们基于柔顺血管的新解决方案开发了一个分析性的肱主动脉转移函数。通过数值模拟结果成功验证了该传递函数的准确性,该传递函数有效地再现了脉搏波的传播和放大,关键血流动力学参数落在临床测量范围内。对传递函数的进一步分析表明,cBP是bBP和主动脉流速在频域的线性组合,其系数由血管几何形状、材料特性和边界条件决定。此外,bBP主要对cBP的稳定部分起作用,而主动脉流速则对脉动部分起作用。此外,局部敏感性分析表明,管腔半径是准确估计cBP的最重要参数。虽然不能直接应用于临床,但所提出的传递函数增强了对潜在物理的理解,强调了主动脉流量和管腔半径的重要性,并可以指导更实用的传递函数的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure through fluid–structure interaction modeling

Central blood pressure (cBP) is considered a superior indicator of cardiovascular fitness than brachial blood pressure (bBP). Even though bBP is easy to measure noninvasively, it is usually higher than cBP due to pulse wave amplification, characterized by the gradual increase in peak systolic pressure during pulse wave propagation. In this study, we aim to develop an individualized transfer function that can accurately estimate cBP from bBP. We first construct a three-dimensional, patient-specific model of the upper limb arterial system using fluid–structure interaction simulations, incorporating variable material properties and complex boundary conditions. Then, we develop an analytical brachial-aortic transfer function based on novel solutions for compliant vessels. The accuracy of this transfer function is successfully validated against numerical simulation results, which effectively reproduce pulse wave propagation and amplification, with key hemodynamic parameters falling within the range of clinical measurements. Further analysis of the transfer function reveals that cBP is a linear combination of bBP and aortic flow rate in the frequency domain, with the coefficients determined by vessel geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions. Additionally, bBP primarily contributes to the steady component of cBP, while the aortic flow rate is responsible for the pulsatile component. Furthermore, local sensitivity analysis indicates that the lumen radius is the most influential parameter in accurately estimating cBP. Although not directly applicable clinically, the proposed transfer function enhances understanding of the underlying physics—highlighting the importance of aortic flow and lumen radius—and can guide the development of more practical transfer functions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信