混合交通环境下自动驾驶汽车交叉口冲突解决行为研究

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Md Tanvir Ashraf, Kakan Dey
{"title":"混合交通环境下自动驾驶汽车交叉口冲突解决行为研究","authors":"Md Tanvir Ashraf,&nbsp;Kakan Dey","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Navigating intersections is a major challenge for autonomous vehicles (AVs) because of the complex interactions between different roadway user types, conflicting movements, and diverse operational and geometric features. This study investigated intersection-related AV-involved traffic conflicts by analyzing the Arogoverse-2 motion forecasting dataset to understand the driving behavior of AVs at intersections. The conflict scenarios were categorized into AV-involved and no AV conflict scenarios. Depending on whether AVs passed the conflict region first or second in AV-involved scenarios, AV-involved scenarios were further classified into AV-first and AV-second scenarios. An agglomerative hierarchical clustering with t-SNE dimension reduction technique was applied to categorize the driving styles, and a three-layer Bayesian hierarchical model was applied to analyze the effect of driving volatility measures and traffic characteristics on relative crash risks. The clustering result showed that about 29% of the conflict events in the AV-first scenario (human-driven vehicle (HDV) was the following vehicle in passing the conflict region) exhibited <em>high-risk</em> of conflicts. In contrast, all conflicts events in the AV-second category were either <em>low-risk</em> or <em>medium-risk</em> conflicts. Parameter estimates showed that AVs had safer interactions with the other roadway users (i.e., HDVs, pedestrians/cyclists) while maintaining higher speeds and uniform driving profiles. AV’s interaction with vulnerable road users (i.e., pedestrians and cyclists) showed lower crash risk compared to HDVs, indicating AV’s safer driving behavior. AVs also demonstrated safer conflict resolution behavior in performing unprotected left turns compared to HDVs. This study discovered some unique insights into the challenges of introducing AVs in diverse intersection types (i.e., signalized, unsignalized, stop-controlled), which can be used to identify AV technology’s improvement need to better adapt to the mixed traffic driving environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 107897"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflict resolution behavior of autonomous vehicles at intersections under mixed traffic environment\",\"authors\":\"Md Tanvir Ashraf,&nbsp;Kakan Dey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Navigating intersections is a major challenge for autonomous vehicles (AVs) because of the complex interactions between different roadway user types, conflicting movements, and diverse operational and geometric features. This study investigated intersection-related AV-involved traffic conflicts by analyzing the Arogoverse-2 motion forecasting dataset to understand the driving behavior of AVs at intersections. The conflict scenarios were categorized into AV-involved and no AV conflict scenarios. Depending on whether AVs passed the conflict region first or second in AV-involved scenarios, AV-involved scenarios were further classified into AV-first and AV-second scenarios. An agglomerative hierarchical clustering with t-SNE dimension reduction technique was applied to categorize the driving styles, and a three-layer Bayesian hierarchical model was applied to analyze the effect of driving volatility measures and traffic characteristics on relative crash risks. The clustering result showed that about 29% of the conflict events in the AV-first scenario (human-driven vehicle (HDV) was the following vehicle in passing the conflict region) exhibited <em>high-risk</em> of conflicts. In contrast, all conflicts events in the AV-second category were either <em>low-risk</em> or <em>medium-risk</em> conflicts. Parameter estimates showed that AVs had safer interactions with the other roadway users (i.e., HDVs, pedestrians/cyclists) while maintaining higher speeds and uniform driving profiles. AV’s interaction with vulnerable road users (i.e., pedestrians and cyclists) showed lower crash risk compared to HDVs, indicating AV’s safer driving behavior. AVs also demonstrated safer conflict resolution behavior in performing unprotected left turns compared to HDVs. This study discovered some unique insights into the challenges of introducing AVs in diverse intersection types (i.e., signalized, unsignalized, stop-controlled), which can be used to identify AV technology’s improvement need to better adapt to the mixed traffic driving environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"211 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107897\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524004421\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524004421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于不同道路用户类型之间的复杂交互、冲突运动以及不同的操作和几何特征,十字路口导航是自动驾驶汽车(AVs)面临的主要挑战。本研究通过分析Arogoverse-2运动预测数据集,研究了与交叉口相关的自动驾驶汽车交通冲突,以了解自动驾驶汽车在交叉口的驾驶行为。冲突场景分为自动驾驶汽车冲突场景和无自动驾驶汽车冲突场景。根据自动驾驶车辆在涉事场景中是先通过冲突区域还是后通过冲突区域,将涉事场景进一步分为自动驾驶车辆先行和自动驾驶车辆后通过冲突区域。采用t-SNE降维技术的聚类层次聚类方法对驾驶风格进行分类,并采用三层贝叶斯层次模型分析驾驶波动性测度和交通特征对相对碰撞风险的影响。聚类结果表明,在自动驾驶汽车优先场景下(人类驾驶汽车是经过冲突区域的尾随车辆),约有29%的冲突事件表现出冲突的高风险。相比之下,AV-second类别中的所有冲突事件要么是低风险冲突,要么是中风险冲突。参数估计表明,自动驾驶汽车与其他道路使用者(即hdv、行人/骑自行车的人)的互动更安全,同时保持更高的速度和统一的驾驶剖面。与hdv相比,自动驾驶汽车与弱势道路使用者(即行人和骑自行车的人)的互动碰撞风险更低,表明自动驾驶汽车的驾驶行为更安全。与hdv相比,自动驾驶汽车在进行无保护左转时也表现出更安全的冲突解决行为。本研究对引入自动驾驶汽车在不同类型交叉口(即有信号、无信号、停车控制)面临的挑战提出了一些独特的见解,可用于确定自动驾驶技术的改进需求,以更好地适应混合交通驾驶环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conflict resolution behavior of autonomous vehicles at intersections under mixed traffic environment
Navigating intersections is a major challenge for autonomous vehicles (AVs) because of the complex interactions between different roadway user types, conflicting movements, and diverse operational and geometric features. This study investigated intersection-related AV-involved traffic conflicts by analyzing the Arogoverse-2 motion forecasting dataset to understand the driving behavior of AVs at intersections. The conflict scenarios were categorized into AV-involved and no AV conflict scenarios. Depending on whether AVs passed the conflict region first or second in AV-involved scenarios, AV-involved scenarios were further classified into AV-first and AV-second scenarios. An agglomerative hierarchical clustering with t-SNE dimension reduction technique was applied to categorize the driving styles, and a three-layer Bayesian hierarchical model was applied to analyze the effect of driving volatility measures and traffic characteristics on relative crash risks. The clustering result showed that about 29% of the conflict events in the AV-first scenario (human-driven vehicle (HDV) was the following vehicle in passing the conflict region) exhibited high-risk of conflicts. In contrast, all conflicts events in the AV-second category were either low-risk or medium-risk conflicts. Parameter estimates showed that AVs had safer interactions with the other roadway users (i.e., HDVs, pedestrians/cyclists) while maintaining higher speeds and uniform driving profiles. AV’s interaction with vulnerable road users (i.e., pedestrians and cyclists) showed lower crash risk compared to HDVs, indicating AV’s safer driving behavior. AVs also demonstrated safer conflict resolution behavior in performing unprotected left turns compared to HDVs. This study discovered some unique insights into the challenges of introducing AVs in diverse intersection types (i.e., signalized, unsignalized, stop-controlled), which can be used to identify AV technology’s improvement need to better adapt to the mixed traffic driving environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信