一项系统综述和荟萃分析的更新,探讨了戒烟电子烟干预研究中的风味。

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1111/add.16736
Nicola Lindson, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Ailsa R Butler, David T Levy, Phoebe Barnett, Annika Theodoulou, Caitlin Notley, Nancy A Rigotti, Yixian Chen, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
{"title":"一项系统综述和荟萃分析的更新,探讨了戒烟电子烟干预研究中的风味。","authors":"Nicola Lindson, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Ailsa R Butler, David T Levy, Phoebe Barnett, Annika Theodoulou, Caitlin Notley, Nancy A Rigotti, Yixian Chen, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce","doi":"10.1111/add.16736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine patterns of e-cigarette flavour use (sweet, tobacco, menthol/mint) in interventional studies of e-cigarettes for stopping smoking, and to estimate associations between flavours and smoking/vaping outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Update of secondary data analyses, including meta-analyses subgrouped by flavour provision and narrative syntheses, incorporating data from January 2004 to February 2024. Eligible studies were identified from a Cochrane review. Studies provided adults who smoked cigarettes with nicotine-containing e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and provided data on e-cigarette e-liquid flavour use. Outcomes included participants' flavour use measured at any time, plus smoking abstinence, abstinence from all tobacco or commercial nicotine products and allocated product use at 6 months or longer, reported as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 25 studies (n = 16 748); 21 contributed to subgroup meta-analyses and 18 provided flavour choices. We judged 15 studies at high, seven at low and three at unclear risk of bias. In studies where participants had a choice of flavours, some switching between flavours occurred (five studies). A preference for sweet (including fruit) flavours over tobacco and menthol was indicated (in 6 of 11 studies); however, there were differences across studies. Subgroup meta-analyses showed no clear associations between e-liquid flavours provided and smoking cessation or study product use. One included study randomised participants to two different flavour conditions and found similar cessation rates and long-term e-cigarette use between arms at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some people using e-cigarettes to quit smoking switch between e-cigarette flavours during a quit attempt. Sweet flavours may be preferred overall, but this may differ depending on context. Based on intervention studies, there is no clear association between the use of e-cigarette flavours and smoking cessation or longer-term e-cigarette use, possibly due to a paucity of data.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An update of a systematic review and meta-analyses exploring flavours in intervention studies of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Lindson, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Ailsa R Butler, David T Levy, Phoebe Barnett, Annika Theodoulou, Caitlin Notley, Nancy A Rigotti, Yixian Chen, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.16736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine patterns of e-cigarette flavour use (sweet, tobacco, menthol/mint) in interventional studies of e-cigarettes for stopping smoking, and to estimate associations between flavours and smoking/vaping outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Update of secondary data analyses, including meta-analyses subgrouped by flavour provision and narrative syntheses, incorporating data from January 2004 to February 2024. Eligible studies were identified from a Cochrane review. Studies provided adults who smoked cigarettes with nicotine-containing e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and provided data on e-cigarette e-liquid flavour use. Outcomes included participants' flavour use measured at any time, plus smoking abstinence, abstinence from all tobacco or commercial nicotine products and allocated product use at 6 months or longer, reported as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 25 studies (n = 16 748); 21 contributed to subgroup meta-analyses and 18 provided flavour choices. We judged 15 studies at high, seven at low and three at unclear risk of bias. In studies where participants had a choice of flavours, some switching between flavours occurred (five studies). A preference for sweet (including fruit) flavours over tobacco and menthol was indicated (in 6 of 11 studies); however, there were differences across studies. Subgroup meta-analyses showed no clear associations between e-liquid flavours provided and smoking cessation or study product use. One included study randomised participants to two different flavour conditions and found similar cessation rates and long-term e-cigarette use between arms at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some people using e-cigarettes to quit smoking switch between e-cigarette flavours during a quit attempt. Sweet flavours may be preferred overall, but this may differ depending on context. Based on intervention studies, there is no clear association between the use of e-cigarette flavours and smoking cessation or longer-term e-cigarette use, possibly due to a paucity of data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16736\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16736","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在戒烟电子烟的介入研究中确定电子烟香料的使用模式(甜味、烟草、薄荷/薄荷),并估计香料与吸烟/吸电子烟结果之间的关联。方法:更新二手数据分析,包括按风味提供和叙事综合分组的meta分析,纳入2004年1月至2024年2月的数据。从Cochrane综述中确定了符合条件的研究。研究为吸烟的成年人提供了含有尼古丁的电子烟戒烟,并提供了电子烟电子液体香精使用的数据。结果包括参与者在任何时候测量的味道使用情况,加上戒烟,戒除所有烟草或商业尼古丁产品,并在6个月或更长时间内分配产品使用,报告为95%置信区间的风险比。我们使用Cochrane risk of bias 1工具评估偏倚风险。结果:我们纳入了25项研究(n = 16748);21人参与了亚组荟萃分析,18人提供了口味选择。我们判定15项研究为高偏倚风险,7项为低偏倚风险,3项为不明确偏倚风险。在参与者可以选择口味的研究中,出现了一些口味之间的切换(五项研究)。11项研究中的6项表明,与烟草和薄荷相比,人们更喜欢甜味(包括水果味);然而,各研究之间存在差异。亚组荟萃分析显示,提供的电子液体口味与戒烟或研究产品使用之间没有明确的联系。其中一项研究将参与者随机分配到两种不同的口味环境中,发现两组参与者在12个月时的戒烟率和长期使用电子烟的情况相似。结论:一些使用电子烟戒烟的人在戒烟过程中会在不同的电子烟口味之间切换。总的来说,甜味可能更受欢迎,但这可能因环境而异。根据干预研究,使用电子烟口味与戒烟或长期使用电子烟之间没有明确的联系,可能是由于缺乏数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An update of a systematic review and meta-analyses exploring flavours in intervention studies of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Aims: To determine patterns of e-cigarette flavour use (sweet, tobacco, menthol/mint) in interventional studies of e-cigarettes for stopping smoking, and to estimate associations between flavours and smoking/vaping outcomes.

Methods: Update of secondary data analyses, including meta-analyses subgrouped by flavour provision and narrative syntheses, incorporating data from January 2004 to February 2024. Eligible studies were identified from a Cochrane review. Studies provided adults who smoked cigarettes with nicotine-containing e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and provided data on e-cigarette e-liquid flavour use. Outcomes included participants' flavour use measured at any time, plus smoking abstinence, abstinence from all tobacco or commercial nicotine products and allocated product use at 6 months or longer, reported as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 tool.

Results: We included 25 studies (n = 16 748); 21 contributed to subgroup meta-analyses and 18 provided flavour choices. We judged 15 studies at high, seven at low and three at unclear risk of bias. In studies where participants had a choice of flavours, some switching between flavours occurred (five studies). A preference for sweet (including fruit) flavours over tobacco and menthol was indicated (in 6 of 11 studies); however, there were differences across studies. Subgroup meta-analyses showed no clear associations between e-liquid flavours provided and smoking cessation or study product use. One included study randomised participants to two different flavour conditions and found similar cessation rates and long-term e-cigarette use between arms at 12 months.

Conclusions: Some people using e-cigarettes to quit smoking switch between e-cigarette flavours during a quit attempt. Sweet flavours may be preferred overall, but this may differ depending on context. Based on intervention studies, there is no clear association between the use of e-cigarette flavours and smoking cessation or longer-term e-cigarette use, possibly due to a paucity of data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信