感谢我们的科学卫士

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Jacqueline L. Frair
{"title":"感谢我们的科学卫士","authors":"Jacqueline L. Frair","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the first issue of <i>The Journal of Wildlife Management</i> (<i>JWM</i>) for which I served as Editor-in-Chief (EIC). I am deeply grateful for the trust and support of The Wildlife Society (TWS) and honored to follow in the footsteps of the esteemed EICs that have preceded me.</p><p>Foremost, I want to acknowledge the indelible legacy of our outgoing EIC, Paul Krausman. His collective time as EIC for JWM spanned 11 years (he served another 5 years as EIC for Wildlife Monographs), which contrasts to an average of ~2.5 years for the 31 other JWM EICs (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>). No other EIC for JWM oversaw such a dramatic scope of change in the publishing arena as Paul. To elaborate on that point, consider that Paul's EIC career began in 1988 with a drive to Texas for the transfer of “boxes upon boxes” of printed manuscripts (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>) and culminated with navigating how to embrace the benefits and guard against the perils of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing (Krausman <span>2023<i>a</i></span>). Paul deftly guided, protected, and improved our flagship journal through innumerable challenges over his career. I am grateful for his expertise and thoughtful leadership of JWM and his mentorship as he passed the torch to me.</p><p>In reviewing Paul's editorials, key aspects of his legacy as EIC became apparent and invariably underscored his goal of publishing “the best science in the field available to advance wildlife management and conservation” (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>). Towards that end Paul often offered tips for communicating science effectively (Krausman <span>2016<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>, <span>2017<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>, <span>2018<i>a</i></span>, <span>2020<i>a</i></span>, <span>2024<i>a</i></span>; Krausman and Cox <span>2020</span>), providing specific guidance to graduate students and first-time authors (Krausman <span>2021<i>a</i></span>, <span>2024<i>b</i></span>), establishing a WILD program to improve the quality of English writing and by extension the accessibility of JWM to international authors (Krausman <span>2015<i>a</i></span>), emphasizing ethics in science and publishing (Krausman <span>2016<i>c</i></span>, <span>2021<i>b</i></span>), and providing insights into how to get publications noticed (Krausman <span>2016<i>e</i></span>). As EIC, Paul often sought and was responsive to author concerns (Krausman <span>2017<i>c</i></span>, <span>2022<i>b</i></span>)—summarizing and streamlining author guidelines (Krausman <span>2017<i>d</i></span>, <span><i>e</i></span>, <span>2018<i>b</i></span>), explaining the necessary evils of page charges (Krausman <span>2017<i>f</i></span>) and rejections (Krausman <span>2020<i>b</i></span>), clarifying content differences between JWM and the Wildlife Society Bulletin (Krausman <span>2016<i>d</i></span>), highlighting the benefits of publishing with Wiley (Krausman <span>2017<i>g</i></span>), and being transparent about journal metrics from submissions and impact factors to the timing of each stage of review from submission to production (e.g., Krausman <span>2023<i>c</i></span>). It is evident through these editorials not only how much Paul cared about the quality of JWM papers but how much he cared about the <i>people</i> behind them from those conducting the research, and those reviewing and helping refine the insights gained, to those relying on the published information to help conserve our wildlife legacy.</p><p>At every available opportunity Paul emphasized the debt owed to “everyone involved in the publication of our research from the authors that submit their work, to the referees, Associate Editors, EICs that make final decisions, TWS staff, the publisher, and, of course, the readers” (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>). Collectively, these are the “Guardians of Science” (Krausman <span>2021<i>b</i></span>) upon which the integrity of our journal depends. Following Paul's lead, I want to take the time here to especially thank the publications staff, Anna Knipps and Allison Cox, along with our committed board of Associate Editors (see https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/19372817/editorialboard.html), without whom the whole enterprise would crumble. And given the incredibly important and often thankless job provided by referees, we will continue to recognize all of our reviewers for the previous year in the third issue of JWM (e.g., Krausman <span>2023<i>b</i></span>). Voluntary peer-review is the backbone of scientific integrity, and the value of our committed set of reviewers is incalculable. I also want to thank the TWS Publications Committee, TWS Council, and Wiley staff, each of whom supports the society's publications in innumerable and important ways. Lastly, thank you to the 328,180 downloaders, representing a minimum of article readers, so far in 2024 (as of 11-12-24 8:56 AM). To each of you, a tremendous debt is owed.</p><p>As incoming EIC, I'm as honored to work with such a talented and dedicated group of people as I am humbled by Paul's legacy—he left big shoes to fill, literally and figuratively. I look forward to building on the legacy left by Paul and previous EICs, meeting the demands of the ever-changing publishing arena, and ensuring the integrity and accessibility of the best available wildlife science for current and future wildlife professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22700","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thank you to our Guardians of Science\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline L. Frair\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.22700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This is the first issue of <i>The Journal of Wildlife Management</i> (<i>JWM</i>) for which I served as Editor-in-Chief (EIC). I am deeply grateful for the trust and support of The Wildlife Society (TWS) and honored to follow in the footsteps of the esteemed EICs that have preceded me.</p><p>Foremost, I want to acknowledge the indelible legacy of our outgoing EIC, Paul Krausman. His collective time as EIC for JWM spanned 11 years (he served another 5 years as EIC for Wildlife Monographs), which contrasts to an average of ~2.5 years for the 31 other JWM EICs (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>). No other EIC for JWM oversaw such a dramatic scope of change in the publishing arena as Paul. To elaborate on that point, consider that Paul's EIC career began in 1988 with a drive to Texas for the transfer of “boxes upon boxes” of printed manuscripts (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>) and culminated with navigating how to embrace the benefits and guard against the perils of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing (Krausman <span>2023<i>a</i></span>). Paul deftly guided, protected, and improved our flagship journal through innumerable challenges over his career. I am grateful for his expertise and thoughtful leadership of JWM and his mentorship as he passed the torch to me.</p><p>In reviewing Paul's editorials, key aspects of his legacy as EIC became apparent and invariably underscored his goal of publishing “the best science in the field available to advance wildlife management and conservation” (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>). Towards that end Paul often offered tips for communicating science effectively (Krausman <span>2016<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>, <span>2017<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>, <span>2018<i>a</i></span>, <span>2020<i>a</i></span>, <span>2024<i>a</i></span>; Krausman and Cox <span>2020</span>), providing specific guidance to graduate students and first-time authors (Krausman <span>2021<i>a</i></span>, <span>2024<i>b</i></span>), establishing a WILD program to improve the quality of English writing and by extension the accessibility of JWM to international authors (Krausman <span>2015<i>a</i></span>), emphasizing ethics in science and publishing (Krausman <span>2016<i>c</i></span>, <span>2021<i>b</i></span>), and providing insights into how to get publications noticed (Krausman <span>2016<i>e</i></span>). As EIC, Paul often sought and was responsive to author concerns (Krausman <span>2017<i>c</i></span>, <span>2022<i>b</i></span>)—summarizing and streamlining author guidelines (Krausman <span>2017<i>d</i></span>, <span><i>e</i></span>, <span>2018<i>b</i></span>), explaining the necessary evils of page charges (Krausman <span>2017<i>f</i></span>) and rejections (Krausman <span>2020<i>b</i></span>), clarifying content differences between JWM and the Wildlife Society Bulletin (Krausman <span>2016<i>d</i></span>), highlighting the benefits of publishing with Wiley (Krausman <span>2017<i>g</i></span>), and being transparent about journal metrics from submissions and impact factors to the timing of each stage of review from submission to production (e.g., Krausman <span>2023<i>c</i></span>). It is evident through these editorials not only how much Paul cared about the quality of JWM papers but how much he cared about the <i>people</i> behind them from those conducting the research, and those reviewing and helping refine the insights gained, to those relying on the published information to help conserve our wildlife legacy.</p><p>At every available opportunity Paul emphasized the debt owed to “everyone involved in the publication of our research from the authors that submit their work, to the referees, Associate Editors, EICs that make final decisions, TWS staff, the publisher, and, of course, the readers” (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>). Collectively, these are the “Guardians of Science” (Krausman <span>2021<i>b</i></span>) upon which the integrity of our journal depends. Following Paul's lead, I want to take the time here to especially thank the publications staff, Anna Knipps and Allison Cox, along with our committed board of Associate Editors (see https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/19372817/editorialboard.html), without whom the whole enterprise would crumble. And given the incredibly important and often thankless job provided by referees, we will continue to recognize all of our reviewers for the previous year in the third issue of JWM (e.g., Krausman <span>2023<i>b</i></span>). Voluntary peer-review is the backbone of scientific integrity, and the value of our committed set of reviewers is incalculable. I also want to thank the TWS Publications Committee, TWS Council, and Wiley staff, each of whom supports the society's publications in innumerable and important ways. Lastly, thank you to the 328,180 downloaders, representing a minimum of article readers, so far in 2024 (as of 11-12-24 8:56 AM). To each of you, a tremendous debt is owed.</p><p>As incoming EIC, I'm as honored to work with such a talented and dedicated group of people as I am humbled by Paul's legacy—he left big shoes to fill, literally and figuratively. I look forward to building on the legacy left by Paul and previous EICs, meeting the demands of the ever-changing publishing arena, and ensuring the integrity and accessibility of the best available wildlife science for current and future wildlife professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22700\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22700\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是我担任主编的《野生动物管理杂志》(JWM)的第一期。我非常感谢野生动物协会(TWS)的信任和支持,并很荣幸能够追随我之前受人尊敬的eic的脚步。首先,我要感谢即将离任的首席执行官保罗·克劳斯曼留下的不可磨灭的遗产。他在JWM担任EIC的总时间长达11年(他还担任野生动物专著的EIC 5年),与其他31位JWM EIC的平均约2.5年形成鲜明对比(Krausman 2022a)。在JWM的其他EIC中,没有人能像Paul那样在出版领域见证如此巨大的变化。为了详细说明这一点,请考虑保罗的EIC职业生涯始于1988年,当时他开车去德克萨斯州转移“一箱又一箱”的印刷手稿(Krausman 2022a),并在如何在科学出版中接受人工智能的好处并防范人工智能的危险(Krausman 2023a)时达到高潮。保罗在他的职业生涯中经历了无数的挑战,巧妙地指导、保护和改进了我们的旗舰杂志。我非常感谢他在JWM的专业知识和周到的领导,以及他将火炬传递给我的指导。在回顾保罗的社论时,他作为EIC的遗产的关键方面变得明显,并且总是强调他的目标是出版“可用于推进野生动物管理和保护的领域的最佳科学”(Krausman 2022a)。为此,保罗经常提供有效传播科学的技巧(Krausman 2016a, b, 2017a, b, 2018a, 2020a, 2024a;Krausman and Cox 2020),为研究生和首次作者提供具体指导(Krausman 2021a, 2024b),建立一个WILD计划以提高英语写作质量,并通过扩展JWM对国际作者的可访问性(Krausman 2015a),强调科学和出版中的伦理(Krausman 2016c, 2021b),并提供如何获得出版物注意的见解(Krausman 2016e)。作为EIC, Paul经常寻求并回应作者的关注(Krausman 2017c, 2022b) -总结和简化作者指南(Krausman 2017d, e, 2018b),解释页面收费(Krausman 2017f)和拒绝(Krausman 2020b)的必要弊端,澄清JWM和野生动物协会公报(Krausman 2016d)之间的内容差异,强调与Wiley一起出版的好处(Krausman 2017g)。从投稿和影响因素到从投稿到出版的每个评审阶段的时间,对期刊指标保持透明(例如,Krausman 2023c)。从这些社论中可以明显看出,保罗不仅非常关心JWM论文的质量,而且也非常关心这些论文背后的人,从进行研究的人,到审查和帮助完善所获得的见解的人,再到依靠发表的信息来帮助保护我们的野生动物遗产的人。每次有机会,Paul都强调要感谢“参与我们研究出版的每一个人,从提交作品的作者,到审稿人,副编辑,做出最终决定的eic, TWS员工,出版商,当然还有读者”(Krausman 2022a)。总的来说,他们是“科学守护者”(Krausman 2021b),我们期刊的完整性依赖于他们。在保罗的带领下,我想在这里花点时间特别感谢出版人员,安娜·尼普斯和艾莉森·考克斯,以及我们忠诚的副编辑委员会(见https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/19372817/editorialboard.html),没有他们,整个企业将崩溃。考虑到审稿人提供的非常重要且常常吃力不讨好的工作,我们将继续在JWM第三期中表彰上一年的所有审稿人(例如,Krausman 2023b)。自愿同行评议是科学诚信的支柱,我们忠诚的审稿人的价值是不可估量的。我还要感谢TWS出版委员会、TWS理事会和Wiley的工作人员,他们每个人都以无数重要的方式支持协会的出版物。最后,感谢328,180名下载者,他们代表了2024年迄今为止(截至11-12-24 8:56 AM)的最低文章读者人数。你们每个人都欠下了一笔巨大的债务。作为即将上任的首席执行官,我很荣幸能与这样一群有才华、有奉献精神的人一起工作,就像我对保罗的遗产感到谦卑一样——他留下了很多需要填补的空缺,无论是字面上还是象征意义上。我期待着在Paul和以前的eic留下的遗产的基础上继续努力,满足不断变化的出版领域的需求,并确保当前和未来的野生动物专业人员获得最好的野生动物科学的完整性和可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thank you to our Guardians of Science

This is the first issue of The Journal of Wildlife Management (JWM) for which I served as Editor-in-Chief (EIC). I am deeply grateful for the trust and support of The Wildlife Society (TWS) and honored to follow in the footsteps of the esteemed EICs that have preceded me.

Foremost, I want to acknowledge the indelible legacy of our outgoing EIC, Paul Krausman. His collective time as EIC for JWM spanned 11 years (he served another 5 years as EIC for Wildlife Monographs), which contrasts to an average of ~2.5 years for the 31 other JWM EICs (Krausman 2022a). No other EIC for JWM oversaw such a dramatic scope of change in the publishing arena as Paul. To elaborate on that point, consider that Paul's EIC career began in 1988 with a drive to Texas for the transfer of “boxes upon boxes” of printed manuscripts (Krausman 2022a) and culminated with navigating how to embrace the benefits and guard against the perils of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing (Krausman 2023a). Paul deftly guided, protected, and improved our flagship journal through innumerable challenges over his career. I am grateful for his expertise and thoughtful leadership of JWM and his mentorship as he passed the torch to me.

In reviewing Paul's editorials, key aspects of his legacy as EIC became apparent and invariably underscored his goal of publishing “the best science in the field available to advance wildlife management and conservation” (Krausman 2022a). Towards that end Paul often offered tips for communicating science effectively (Krausman 2016ab2017ab2018a2020a2024a; Krausman and Cox 2020), providing specific guidance to graduate students and first-time authors (Krausman 2021a2024b), establishing a WILD program to improve the quality of English writing and by extension the accessibility of JWM to international authors (Krausman 2015a), emphasizing ethics in science and publishing (Krausman 2016c2021b), and providing insights into how to get publications noticed (Krausman 2016e). As EIC, Paul often sought and was responsive to author concerns (Krausman 2017c2022b)—summarizing and streamlining author guidelines (Krausman 2017de2018b), explaining the necessary evils of page charges (Krausman 2017f) and rejections (Krausman 2020b), clarifying content differences between JWM and the Wildlife Society Bulletin (Krausman 2016d), highlighting the benefits of publishing with Wiley (Krausman 2017g), and being transparent about journal metrics from submissions and impact factors to the timing of each stage of review from submission to production (e.g., Krausman 2023c). It is evident through these editorials not only how much Paul cared about the quality of JWM papers but how much he cared about the people behind them from those conducting the research, and those reviewing and helping refine the insights gained, to those relying on the published information to help conserve our wildlife legacy.

At every available opportunity Paul emphasized the debt owed to “everyone involved in the publication of our research from the authors that submit their work, to the referees, Associate Editors, EICs that make final decisions, TWS staff, the publisher, and, of course, the readers” (Krausman 2022a). Collectively, these are the “Guardians of Science” (Krausman 2021b) upon which the integrity of our journal depends. Following Paul's lead, I want to take the time here to especially thank the publications staff, Anna Knipps and Allison Cox, along with our committed board of Associate Editors (see https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/19372817/editorialboard.html), without whom the whole enterprise would crumble. And given the incredibly important and often thankless job provided by referees, we will continue to recognize all of our reviewers for the previous year in the third issue of JWM (e.g., Krausman 2023b). Voluntary peer-review is the backbone of scientific integrity, and the value of our committed set of reviewers is incalculable. I also want to thank the TWS Publications Committee, TWS Council, and Wiley staff, each of whom supports the society's publications in innumerable and important ways. Lastly, thank you to the 328,180 downloaders, representing a minimum of article readers, so far in 2024 (as of 11-12-24 8:56 AM). To each of you, a tremendous debt is owed.

As incoming EIC, I'm as honored to work with such a talented and dedicated group of people as I am humbled by Paul's legacy—he left big shoes to fill, literally and figuratively. I look forward to building on the legacy left by Paul and previous EICs, meeting the demands of the ever-changing publishing arena, and ensuring the integrity and accessibility of the best available wildlife science for current and future wildlife professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信