{"title":"基于失效模式控制的钢抗弯矩膝支撑框架体系抗震设计","authors":"Mostafa Fathi Sepahvand, Akhrawat Lenwari","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents the seismic design of a steel moment-resisting knee-braced frame (MKF) using the theory of plastic mechanism control (TPMC) within the capacity-based design framework. The MKF is an alternative system to MRFs, wherein knee elements are utilized to provide rigid connections and enhance lateral stiffness. Capacity-based design, the predominant approach in current seismic provisions, relies on two key principles: (1) selecting specific structural components as fuses with sufficient ductility to dissipate seismic energy, and (2) ensuring non-fuse elements can resist the maximum probable reactions from these fuses. The ultimate goal is to achieve a global mechanism where yielding occurs in all structural fuses and at the base of first-story columns. However, existing seismic design provisions often struggle to fully satisfy the second principle due to the lack of a method for controlling failure modes. TPMC addresses this challenge by ensuring compliance with the second principle, grounding its approach in the kinematic method and the mechanism equilibrium curve within the rigid-plastic analysis framework. By considering all potential story-based undesirable mechanisms and calculating the required plastic moment of columns up to a target design displacement, TPMC ensures adherence to the second principle of the capacity-based design approach, leading to the achievement of a global collapse mechanism. In this paper, an iterative method is proposed for designing beams and knee elements by considering plastic hinges at both ends of the beams, followed by a TPMC-based methodology for designing columns to ensure a global mechanism. A parametric analysis of a single-story single-span MKF explores the effects of knee element geometry (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mi>b</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>${l}_b/L$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>β</mi>\n <annotation>$\\beta $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) on component demands. The results indicate that optimal parameter ranges of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>0.175</mn>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mi>b</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <mn>0.25</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$0.175 \\le {l}_b/L \\le 0.25$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mo>∘</mo>\n </msup>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <mi>β</mi>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <msup>\n <mn>60</mn>\n <mo>∘</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$40^\\circ \\le \\beta \\le 60^\\circ $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> can minimize the demands for MKF components. Practical design examples are illustrated using three steel MKFs, each consisting of four, seven, and ten stories with five spans. Pushover analysis and nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design procedure in ensuring the attainment of a global mechanism and excellent seismic performance under real ground motions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 1","pages":"271-294"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic design of steel moment-resisting knee-braced frame system by failure mode control\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Fathi Sepahvand, Akhrawat Lenwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eqe.4258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper presents the seismic design of a steel moment-resisting knee-braced frame (MKF) using the theory of plastic mechanism control (TPMC) within the capacity-based design framework. The MKF is an alternative system to MRFs, wherein knee elements are utilized to provide rigid connections and enhance lateral stiffness. Capacity-based design, the predominant approach in current seismic provisions, relies on two key principles: (1) selecting specific structural components as fuses with sufficient ductility to dissipate seismic energy, and (2) ensuring non-fuse elements can resist the maximum probable reactions from these fuses. The ultimate goal is to achieve a global mechanism where yielding occurs in all structural fuses and at the base of first-story columns. However, existing seismic design provisions often struggle to fully satisfy the second principle due to the lack of a method for controlling failure modes. TPMC addresses this challenge by ensuring compliance with the second principle, grounding its approach in the kinematic method and the mechanism equilibrium curve within the rigid-plastic analysis framework. By considering all potential story-based undesirable mechanisms and calculating the required plastic moment of columns up to a target design displacement, TPMC ensures adherence to the second principle of the capacity-based design approach, leading to the achievement of a global collapse mechanism. In this paper, an iterative method is proposed for designing beams and knee elements by considering plastic hinges at both ends of the beams, followed by a TPMC-based methodology for designing columns to ensure a global mechanism. A parametric analysis of a single-story single-span MKF explores the effects of knee element geometry (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n <mi>b</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>${l}_b/L$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>β</mi>\\n <annotation>$\\\\beta $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) on component demands. The results indicate that optimal parameter ranges of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>0.175</mn>\\n <mo>≤</mo>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n <mi>b</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mo>≤</mo>\\n <mn>0.25</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$0.175 \\\\le {l}_b/L \\\\le 0.25$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>40</mn>\\n <mo>∘</mo>\\n </msup>\\n <mo>≤</mo>\\n <mi>β</mi>\\n <mo>≤</mo>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>60</mn>\\n <mo>∘</mo>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$40^\\\\circ \\\\le \\\\beta \\\\le 60^\\\\circ $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> can minimize the demands for MKF components. Practical design examples are illustrated using three steel MKFs, each consisting of four, seven, and ten stories with five spans. Pushover analysis and nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design procedure in ensuring the attainment of a global mechanism and excellent seismic performance under real ground motions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"271-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4258\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文在基于能力的设计框架下,采用塑性机制控制理论对钢抗弯矩膝支撑框架进行抗震设计。MKF是mrf的替代系统,其中膝关节元件用于提供刚性连接并增强横向刚度。基于能力的设计是当前地震规定的主要方法,它依赖于两个关键原则:(1)选择具有足够延展性的特定结构部件作为熔断器,以耗散地震能量;(2)确保非熔断器元件能够抵抗这些熔断器的最大可能反应。最终目标是实现一种整体机制,即在所有结构引信和第一层柱的底部都发生屈服。然而,由于缺乏控制破坏模式的方法,现有的抗震设计规定往往难以完全满足第二条原则。TPMC通过确保符合第二个原则来解决这一挑战,将其方法建立在运动学方法和刚塑性分析框架内的机构平衡曲线上。通过考虑所有潜在的基于层的不良机制,并计算所需的柱塑性矩直至目标设计位移,TPMC确保遵守基于容量的设计方法的第二个原则,从而实现全局崩溃机制。在本文中,提出了一种考虑梁两端塑性铰的梁和膝单元设计迭代方法,然后提出了一种基于tpmc的柱设计方法,以确保整体机构。单层单跨MKF的参数分析探讨了膝关节元件几何形状(l b / l ${l}_b/L$和β $\beta $)对组件需求的影响。结果表明,最佳参数范围为0.175≤l b / l≤0.25 $0.175 \le {l}_b/L \le 0.25$, 40°≤β≤60°$40^\circ \le \beta \le 60^\circ $可以最大限度地减少对MKF元件的需求。实际的设计实例使用了三个钢制mkf,每个mkf由四层、七层和十层组成,有五个跨度。进行了推覆分析和非线性动力分析,以证明所提出的设计程序在确保实现全局机制和实际地面运动下的优异抗震性能方面的有效性。
Seismic design of steel moment-resisting knee-braced frame system by failure mode control
This paper presents the seismic design of a steel moment-resisting knee-braced frame (MKF) using the theory of plastic mechanism control (TPMC) within the capacity-based design framework. The MKF is an alternative system to MRFs, wherein knee elements are utilized to provide rigid connections and enhance lateral stiffness. Capacity-based design, the predominant approach in current seismic provisions, relies on two key principles: (1) selecting specific structural components as fuses with sufficient ductility to dissipate seismic energy, and (2) ensuring non-fuse elements can resist the maximum probable reactions from these fuses. The ultimate goal is to achieve a global mechanism where yielding occurs in all structural fuses and at the base of first-story columns. However, existing seismic design provisions often struggle to fully satisfy the second principle due to the lack of a method for controlling failure modes. TPMC addresses this challenge by ensuring compliance with the second principle, grounding its approach in the kinematic method and the mechanism equilibrium curve within the rigid-plastic analysis framework. By considering all potential story-based undesirable mechanisms and calculating the required plastic moment of columns up to a target design displacement, TPMC ensures adherence to the second principle of the capacity-based design approach, leading to the achievement of a global collapse mechanism. In this paper, an iterative method is proposed for designing beams and knee elements by considering plastic hinges at both ends of the beams, followed by a TPMC-based methodology for designing columns to ensure a global mechanism. A parametric analysis of a single-story single-span MKF explores the effects of knee element geometry ( and ) on component demands. The results indicate that optimal parameter ranges of and can minimize the demands for MKF components. Practical design examples are illustrated using three steel MKFs, each consisting of four, seven, and ten stories with five spans. Pushover analysis and nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design procedure in ensuring the attainment of a global mechanism and excellent seismic performance under real ground motions.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following:
ground motions for analysis and design
geotechnical earthquake engineering
probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis
experimental behaviour of structures
seismic protective systems
system identification
risk assessment
seismic code requirements
methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.