在公共系统中解决性与性别少数群体青少年自杀问题的机会

Dana M. Prince, Megan S. Schuler, Katherine Lewis, Michelle R. Munson, Aaron J. Blashill, Peter S. Hovmand
{"title":"在公共系统中解决性与性别少数群体青少年自杀问题的机会","authors":"Dana M. Prince,&nbsp;Megan S. Schuler,&nbsp;Katherine Lewis,&nbsp;Michelle R. Munson,&nbsp;Aaron J. Blashill,&nbsp;Peter S. Hovmand","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prevention of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) among youth continues to be a public health imperative. In the general population, suicide is the second-leading cause of death for ages 10–24 (Ruch et al. <span>2019</span>). However, specific subgroups of youth are at significantly greater risk of SITB. Public systems involvement, LGBTQ+ status, and Black and/or Latinx youth are at elevated risk. Moreover, LGBTQ+ and Black/Latinx youth—and those who are both—are disproportionately overrepresented in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Child welfare and juvenile justice involved youth have approximately three times greater risk for suicide ideation, attempts, and completions (i.e., self-injurious thoughts and behaviors) than non-systems-involved youth (Agencies <span>2013</span>; Casiano et al. <span>2013</span>; Evans et al. <span>2017</span>; Gallagher and Dobrin <span>2005</span>; Gray et al. <span>2002</span>; Hayes <span>2009</span>; Katz et al. <span>2011</span>; Scott, Underwood, and Lamis <span>2015</span>; Vinnerljung, Hjern, and Lindblad <span>2006</span>). Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) youth in the general population have two to four times the risk of SITB compared to their heterosexual, cisgender peers (Luk et al.<span>2021</span>; Nock et al. <span>2013</span>; Perez-Brumer et al. <span>2017</span>). Notably, SGM youth are disproportionately overrepresented in child welfare and juvenile justice, with estimates ranging from 16% to 32% (Grant et al. <span>2011</span>; Majd, Marksamer, and Reyes <span>2009</span>; Matarese et al. <span>2021</span>; Wilson and Bouton <span>2022</span>; Wilson and Kastanis <span>2018</span>; Wilson et al. <span>2017</span>) compared to 2%–8% in the general population (Conron et al. <span>2014</span>). In sum, the risk of SITB for SGM youth who are involved with public systems is compounded (Dettlaff et al. <span>2018</span>; Johns et al. <span>2020</span>; Scannapieco, Painter, and Blau <span>2018</span>).</p><p>Child welfare and juvenile justice systems can screen, assess, and refer to treatment youth who may not otherwise access services (Casiano et al. <span>2013</span>; Gallagher and Dobrin <span>2005</span>; Gray et al. <span>2002</span>). The unique needs of system-involved SGM youth have been largely ignored, with few child welfare and juvenile justice jurisdictions systematically identifying SGM youth or providing SGM-affirming care (Busby et al. <span>2020</span>; Call, Challa, and Telingator <span>2021</span>; Evans et al. <span>2017</span>; Rider et al. <span>2019</span>). There is a clear and urgent need for system-level interventions to provide SGM youth with equitable care to improve SITB and other behavioral health outcomes. In this paper, we provide a conceptual framework that can guide system-level research in this area, as well as highlighting several key knowledge gaps and research opportunities.</p><p>Sexual and gender minority youth involved in public systems experience very pronounced disparities in terms of mental and behavioral health, yet remain underserved and understudied. Disparities are likely to become even more pronounced in the current sociopolitical reality. A surge of anti-LGBTQ bills have been introduced in the past 3 years, many targeting youth and transgender/gender diverse youth in particular, severely limiting access to gender affirming care (Gzesh et al. <span>2024</span>). Structural- and systems-level drivers of health disparities must be addressed to influence long-term social change and advance health equity for marginalized SGMY.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunities to Address Health Disparities in Suicidality for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth in Public Systems\",\"authors\":\"Dana M. Prince,&nbsp;Megan S. Schuler,&nbsp;Katherine Lewis,&nbsp;Michelle R. Munson,&nbsp;Aaron J. Blashill,&nbsp;Peter S. Hovmand\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mhs2.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The prevention of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) among youth continues to be a public health imperative. In the general population, suicide is the second-leading cause of death for ages 10–24 (Ruch et al. <span>2019</span>). However, specific subgroups of youth are at significantly greater risk of SITB. Public systems involvement, LGBTQ+ status, and Black and/or Latinx youth are at elevated risk. Moreover, LGBTQ+ and Black/Latinx youth—and those who are both—are disproportionately overrepresented in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Child welfare and juvenile justice involved youth have approximately three times greater risk for suicide ideation, attempts, and completions (i.e., self-injurious thoughts and behaviors) than non-systems-involved youth (Agencies <span>2013</span>; Casiano et al. <span>2013</span>; Evans et al. <span>2017</span>; Gallagher and Dobrin <span>2005</span>; Gray et al. <span>2002</span>; Hayes <span>2009</span>; Katz et al. <span>2011</span>; Scott, Underwood, and Lamis <span>2015</span>; Vinnerljung, Hjern, and Lindblad <span>2006</span>). Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) youth in the general population have two to four times the risk of SITB compared to their heterosexual, cisgender peers (Luk et al.<span>2021</span>; Nock et al. <span>2013</span>; Perez-Brumer et al. <span>2017</span>). Notably, SGM youth are disproportionately overrepresented in child welfare and juvenile justice, with estimates ranging from 16% to 32% (Grant et al. <span>2011</span>; Majd, Marksamer, and Reyes <span>2009</span>; Matarese et al. <span>2021</span>; Wilson and Bouton <span>2022</span>; Wilson and Kastanis <span>2018</span>; Wilson et al. <span>2017</span>) compared to 2%–8% in the general population (Conron et al. <span>2014</span>). In sum, the risk of SITB for SGM youth who are involved with public systems is compounded (Dettlaff et al. <span>2018</span>; Johns et al. <span>2020</span>; Scannapieco, Painter, and Blau <span>2018</span>).</p><p>Child welfare and juvenile justice systems can screen, assess, and refer to treatment youth who may not otherwise access services (Casiano et al. <span>2013</span>; Gallagher and Dobrin <span>2005</span>; Gray et al. <span>2002</span>). The unique needs of system-involved SGM youth have been largely ignored, with few child welfare and juvenile justice jurisdictions systematically identifying SGM youth or providing SGM-affirming care (Busby et al. <span>2020</span>; Call, Challa, and Telingator <span>2021</span>; Evans et al. <span>2017</span>; Rider et al. <span>2019</span>). There is a clear and urgent need for system-level interventions to provide SGM youth with equitable care to improve SITB and other behavioral health outcomes. In this paper, we provide a conceptual framework that can guide system-level research in this area, as well as highlighting several key knowledge gaps and research opportunities.</p><p>Sexual and gender minority youth involved in public systems experience very pronounced disparities in terms of mental and behavioral health, yet remain underserved and understudied. Disparities are likely to become even more pronounced in the current sociopolitical reality. A surge of anti-LGBTQ bills have been introduced in the past 3 years, many targeting youth and transgender/gender diverse youth in particular, severely limiting access to gender affirming care (Gzesh et al. <span>2024</span>). Structural- and systems-level drivers of health disparities must be addressed to influence long-term social change and advance health equity for marginalized SGMY.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental health science\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.100\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental health science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预防青少年的自伤想法和行为(SITB)仍然是公共卫生的当务之急。在一般人群中,自杀是 10-24 岁人群的第二大死因(Ruch 等人,2019 年)。然而,特定青少年亚群的 SITB 风险明显更高。参与公共系统、LGBTQ+身份以及黑人和/或拉丁裔青少年的风险较高。此外,LGBTQ+ 和黑人/拉美裔青少年--以及那些两者都是的青少年--在儿童福利和青少年司法系统中的比例过高。涉及儿童福利和少年司法系统的青少年的自杀意念、自杀未遂和自杀完成(即自伤想法和行为)风险比未涉及系统的青少年高出约三倍(Agencies,2013 年;Casiano 等,2013 年;Evans 等,2017 年;Gallagher 和 Dobrin,2005 年;Gray 等,2002 年;Hayes,2009 年;Katz 等,2011 年;Scott、Underwood 和 Lamis,2015 年;Vinnerljung、Hjern 和 Lindblad,2006 年)。在一般人群中,性与性别少数群体(SGM)青少年的 SITB 风险是其异性恋、顺性别同龄人的两到四倍(Luk 等人,2021 年;Nock 等人,2013 年;Perez-Brumer 等人,2017 年)。值得注意的是,SGM 青少年在儿童福利和少年司法中的比例过高,估计从 16% 到 32% 不等(Grant 等人,2011 年;Majd、Marksamer 和 Reyes,2009 年;Matarese 等人,2021 年;Wilson 和 Bouton,2022 年;Wilson 和 Kastanis,2018 年;Wilson 等人,2017 年),而一般人群的比例为 2%-8%(Conron 等人,2014 年)。总之,涉及公共系统的 SGM 青少年的 SITB 风险更大(Dettlaff 等人,2018 年;Johns 等人,2020 年;Scannapieco、Painter 和 Blau,2018 年)。儿童福利和少年司法系统可以筛选、评估和转介那些可能无法以其他方式获得服务的青少年接受治疗(Casiano 等人,2013 年;Gallagher 和 Dobrin,2005 年;Gray 等人,2002 年)。系统介入的 SGM 青少年的独特需求在很大程度上被忽视了,很少有儿童福利和青少年司法管辖区系统地识别 SGM 青少年或提供 SGM 支持护理(Busby 等,2020 年;Call、Challa 和 Telingator,2021 年;Evans 等,2017 年;Rider 等,2019 年)。显然,迫切需要采取系统级干预措施,为 SGM 青少年提供公平的护理,以改善 SITB 及其他行为健康结果。在本文中,我们提供了一个概念框架,可以指导该领域的系统级研究,并强调了几个关键的知识差距和研究机会。"参与公共系统的性与性别少数群体青年在心理和行为健康方面经历着非常明显的差异,但仍然得不到充分的服务和研究。在当前的社会政治背景下,这种差异可能会变得更加明显。在过去的三年里,反男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者的法案激增,其中许多法案尤其针对青少年和变性/跨性别青少年,严重限制了他们获得性别平权护理的机会(Gzesh 等,2024 年)。要影响长期的社会变革,促进被边缘化的 SGMY 的健康公平,就必须从结构和制度层面解决健康差异的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Opportunities to Address Health Disparities in Suicidality for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth in Public Systems

Opportunities to Address Health Disparities in Suicidality for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth in Public Systems

The prevention of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) among youth continues to be a public health imperative. In the general population, suicide is the second-leading cause of death for ages 10–24 (Ruch et al. 2019). However, specific subgroups of youth are at significantly greater risk of SITB. Public systems involvement, LGBTQ+ status, and Black and/or Latinx youth are at elevated risk. Moreover, LGBTQ+ and Black/Latinx youth—and those who are both—are disproportionately overrepresented in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Child welfare and juvenile justice involved youth have approximately three times greater risk for suicide ideation, attempts, and completions (i.e., self-injurious thoughts and behaviors) than non-systems-involved youth (Agencies 2013; Casiano et al. 2013; Evans et al. 2017; Gallagher and Dobrin 2005; Gray et al. 2002; Hayes 2009; Katz et al. 2011; Scott, Underwood, and Lamis 2015; Vinnerljung, Hjern, and Lindblad 2006). Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) youth in the general population have two to four times the risk of SITB compared to their heterosexual, cisgender peers (Luk et al.2021; Nock et al. 2013; Perez-Brumer et al. 2017). Notably, SGM youth are disproportionately overrepresented in child welfare and juvenile justice, with estimates ranging from 16% to 32% (Grant et al. 2011; Majd, Marksamer, and Reyes 2009; Matarese et al. 2021; Wilson and Bouton 2022; Wilson and Kastanis 2018; Wilson et al. 2017) compared to 2%–8% in the general population (Conron et al. 2014). In sum, the risk of SITB for SGM youth who are involved with public systems is compounded (Dettlaff et al. 2018; Johns et al. 2020; Scannapieco, Painter, and Blau 2018).

Child welfare and juvenile justice systems can screen, assess, and refer to treatment youth who may not otherwise access services (Casiano et al. 2013; Gallagher and Dobrin 2005; Gray et al. 2002). The unique needs of system-involved SGM youth have been largely ignored, with few child welfare and juvenile justice jurisdictions systematically identifying SGM youth or providing SGM-affirming care (Busby et al. 2020; Call, Challa, and Telingator 2021; Evans et al. 2017; Rider et al. 2019). There is a clear and urgent need for system-level interventions to provide SGM youth with equitable care to improve SITB and other behavioral health outcomes. In this paper, we provide a conceptual framework that can guide system-level research in this area, as well as highlighting several key knowledge gaps and research opportunities.

Sexual and gender minority youth involved in public systems experience very pronounced disparities in terms of mental and behavioral health, yet remain underserved and understudied. Disparities are likely to become even more pronounced in the current sociopolitical reality. A surge of anti-LGBTQ bills have been introduced in the past 3 years, many targeting youth and transgender/gender diverse youth in particular, severely limiting access to gender affirming care (Gzesh et al. 2024). Structural- and systems-level drivers of health disparities must be addressed to influence long-term social change and advance health equity for marginalized SGMY.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信