{"title":"Results on left–right Artin approximation for algebraic morphisms and for analytic morphisms of weakly-finite singularity type","authors":"Dmitry Kerner","doi":"10.1112/jlms.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The classical Artin approximation (AP) reads: any formal solution of a system of (analytic, resp., algebraic) equations of implicit function type is approximated by “ordinary” solutions (i.e., analytic, resp., algebraic). Morphisms of scheme-germs, for example, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <msup>\n <mi>k</mi>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </msup>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>o</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <msup>\n <mi>k</mi>\n <mi>m</mi>\n </msup>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>o</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$Maps\\big ((\\mathbb {k}^n,o),(\\mathbb {k}^m,o)\\big)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, are usually studied up to the left–right equivalence. The natural question is the left–right version of AP: when is the formal left–right equivalence of morphisms approximated by the “ordinary” (i.e., analytic, resp., algebraic) equivalence? In this case, the standard AP is not directly applicable, as the involved (functional) equations are not of implicit function type. Moreover, the naive extension does not hold in the analytic case, because of Osgood–Gabrielov–Shiota examples. The left–right version of Artin approximation (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathcal L\\mathcal {R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.AP) was established by M. Shiota for morphisms that are either Nash or [real-analytic and of finite singularity type]. We establish <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathcal L\\mathcal {R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.AP and its stronger version of Płoski (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathcal L\\mathcal {R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.APP) for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$Maps (X,Y)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, where <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$X,Y$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> are analytic/algebraic germs of schemes of any characteristic. More precisely: \n\n </p><p>This latter class of morphisms of “weakly-finite singularity type” (which we introduce) is of separate importance. It extends naturally the traditional class of morphisms of “finite singularity type,” while preserving their nonpathological behavior. The definition goes via the higher critical loci and higher discriminants of morphisms with singular targets. We establish basic properties of these critical loci. In particular, any map is finitely (right) determined by its higher critical loci.</p>","PeriodicalId":49989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/jlms.70053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
经典的阿尔丁近似(AP)是这样的:隐函数式(解析式,或代数式)方程组的任何形式解都可以用 "普通 "解(即解析式,或代数式)来近似。图解符号的变形,例如 M a p s ( ( k n , o ) , ( k m , o ) ) , ( k m , o ) ) $Maps\big ((\mathbb {k}^n,o),(\mathbb {k}^m,o)\big)$ ,通常研究到左右等价为止。自然而然的问题是左-右版本的 AP:什么时候形态的形式左-右等价近似于 "普通"(即解析的,也就是代数的)等价?在这种情况下,标准 AP 并不直接适用,因为所涉及的(函数)方程并不属于隐函数类型。此外,由于 Osgood-Gabrielov-Shiota 例子,天真的扩展在解析情况下也不成立。汐田(M. Shiota)针对纳什或[实解析和有限奇点类型]的形态建立了阿廷近似的左右版本(L R $\mathcal L\mathcal {R}$ .AP)。我们为 M a p s ( X , Y ) $Maps (X,Y)$ 建立了 L R $\mathcal L\mathcal {R}$ .AP 及其更强版本 Płoski ( L R $\mathcal L\mathcal {R}$ .APP) ,其中 X , Y $X,Y$ 是任意特征方案的解析/代数胚芽。更确切地说: 后一类 "弱有限奇点类型 "的态射(我们引入的)具有单独的重要性。它自然地扩展了传统的 "有限奇异性类型 "变形,同时保留了它们的非病理性行为。这个定义是通过具有奇异目标的态的高临界位置和高判别式来实现的。我们建立了这些临界点的基本性质。特别是,任何映射都是由其高临界点有限(右)决定的。
Results on left–right Artin approximation for algebraic morphisms and for analytic morphisms of weakly-finite singularity type
The classical Artin approximation (AP) reads: any formal solution of a system of (analytic, resp., algebraic) equations of implicit function type is approximated by “ordinary” solutions (i.e., analytic, resp., algebraic). Morphisms of scheme-germs, for example, , are usually studied up to the left–right equivalence. The natural question is the left–right version of AP: when is the formal left–right equivalence of morphisms approximated by the “ordinary” (i.e., analytic, resp., algebraic) equivalence? In this case, the standard AP is not directly applicable, as the involved (functional) equations are not of implicit function type. Moreover, the naive extension does not hold in the analytic case, because of Osgood–Gabrielov–Shiota examples. The left–right version of Artin approximation (.AP) was established by M. Shiota for morphisms that are either Nash or [real-analytic and of finite singularity type]. We establish .AP and its stronger version of Płoski (.APP) for , where are analytic/algebraic germs of schemes of any characteristic. More precisely:
This latter class of morphisms of “weakly-finite singularity type” (which we introduce) is of separate importance. It extends naturally the traditional class of morphisms of “finite singularity type,” while preserving their nonpathological behavior. The definition goes via the higher critical loci and higher discriminants of morphisms with singular targets. We establish basic properties of these critical loci. In particular, any map is finitely (right) determined by its higher critical loci.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the London Mathematical Society has been publishing leading research in a broad range of mathematical subject areas since 1926. The Journal welcomes papers on subjects of general interest that represent a significant advance in mathematical knowledge, as well as submissions that are deemed to stimulate new interest and research activity.