Tuan Le, Joseph D. Eifert, Cyril A. Etaka, Laura K. Strawn
{"title":"气溶胶大肠杆菌和粪肠球菌在食品级橡胶、高密度聚乙烯塑料、不锈钢和打蜡纸板上的回收率和存活率","authors":"Tuan Le, Joseph D. Eifert, Cyril A. Etaka, Laura K. Strawn","doi":"10.1111/jfs.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contamination of food contact surfaces by airborne transmission of pathogens from the environment has contributed to disease outbreaks. Therefore, this study evaluated the survival and recovery of aerosolized generic <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> from four food contact surfaces (food-grade silicone rubber, high-density polyethylene [HDPE] plastic, stainless steel, and waxed cardboard), after four contact times (10, 20, 40, and 60 min), two relative humidity (RH) levels (high: 80%–90%, low: 40%–50%), three distances from aerosolization source (0, 36.5, and 73 cm; <i>E. coli</i> only), and with and without airflow (<i>E. coli</i> only). ANOVA test with Tukey's HSD at <i>α</i> = 0.05 was used to determine how treatment combinations influenced recovery. At high humidity, <i>E. coli</i> recovery on all materials after 40 min was ~1.0 log lower than recovery after 10 min, and further reduced by 1.0 log at 60 min. At lower humidity, <i>E. coli</i> recovery on all materials was ~1.0 log lower at 10 and 20 min compared with high humidity. Distances exerted no significance, whereas airflow presence lowered <i>E. coli</i> recovery. <i>E. coli</i> survival on all materials declined from ~5.0 log CFU/coupon at 0 h to 3.5 log CFU/coupon at 6 h, and 2.0 log CFU/coupon at 24 h post-inoculation. <i>E. coli</i> recovery was significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) on waxed cardboard. Low RH and longer contact time reduced <i>E. coli</i> recovery but not <i>E. faecium. E. faecium</i> recovery was consistent across treatment combinations, with changes < 0.5 log CFU/coupon. The findings are relevant for the survival of bacteria on common food contact surfaces and the potential of transmission to food products.</p>","PeriodicalId":15814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Safety","volume":"44 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfs.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovery and Survival of Aerosolized Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecium on Food-Grade Rubber, HDPE Plastic, Stainless Steel, and Waxed Cardboard\",\"authors\":\"Tuan Le, Joseph D. Eifert, Cyril A. Etaka, Laura K. Strawn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfs.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Contamination of food contact surfaces by airborne transmission of pathogens from the environment has contributed to disease outbreaks. Therefore, this study evaluated the survival and recovery of aerosolized generic <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> from four food contact surfaces (food-grade silicone rubber, high-density polyethylene [HDPE] plastic, stainless steel, and waxed cardboard), after four contact times (10, 20, 40, and 60 min), two relative humidity (RH) levels (high: 80%–90%, low: 40%–50%), three distances from aerosolization source (0, 36.5, and 73 cm; <i>E. coli</i> only), and with and without airflow (<i>E. coli</i> only). ANOVA test with Tukey's HSD at <i>α</i> = 0.05 was used to determine how treatment combinations influenced recovery. At high humidity, <i>E. coli</i> recovery on all materials after 40 min was ~1.0 log lower than recovery after 10 min, and further reduced by 1.0 log at 60 min. At lower humidity, <i>E. coli</i> recovery on all materials was ~1.0 log lower at 10 and 20 min compared with high humidity. Distances exerted no significance, whereas airflow presence lowered <i>E. coli</i> recovery. <i>E. coli</i> survival on all materials declined from ~5.0 log CFU/coupon at 0 h to 3.5 log CFU/coupon at 6 h, and 2.0 log CFU/coupon at 24 h post-inoculation. <i>E. coli</i> recovery was significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) on waxed cardboard. Low RH and longer contact time reduced <i>E. coli</i> recovery but not <i>E. faecium. E. faecium</i> recovery was consistent across treatment combinations, with changes < 0.5 log CFU/coupon. The findings are relevant for the survival of bacteria on common food contact surfaces and the potential of transmission to food products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfs.70002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.70002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recovery and Survival of Aerosolized Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecium on Food-Grade Rubber, HDPE Plastic, Stainless Steel, and Waxed Cardboard
Contamination of food contact surfaces by airborne transmission of pathogens from the environment has contributed to disease outbreaks. Therefore, this study evaluated the survival and recovery of aerosolized generic Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecium from four food contact surfaces (food-grade silicone rubber, high-density polyethylene [HDPE] plastic, stainless steel, and waxed cardboard), after four contact times (10, 20, 40, and 60 min), two relative humidity (RH) levels (high: 80%–90%, low: 40%–50%), three distances from aerosolization source (0, 36.5, and 73 cm; E. coli only), and with and without airflow (E. coli only). ANOVA test with Tukey's HSD at α = 0.05 was used to determine how treatment combinations influenced recovery. At high humidity, E. coli recovery on all materials after 40 min was ~1.0 log lower than recovery after 10 min, and further reduced by 1.0 log at 60 min. At lower humidity, E. coli recovery on all materials was ~1.0 log lower at 10 and 20 min compared with high humidity. Distances exerted no significance, whereas airflow presence lowered E. coli recovery. E. coli survival on all materials declined from ~5.0 log CFU/coupon at 0 h to 3.5 log CFU/coupon at 6 h, and 2.0 log CFU/coupon at 24 h post-inoculation. E. coli recovery was significantly lower (p < 0.05) on waxed cardboard. Low RH and longer contact time reduced E. coli recovery but not E. faecium. E. faecium recovery was consistent across treatment combinations, with changes < 0.5 log CFU/coupon. The findings are relevant for the survival of bacteria on common food contact surfaces and the potential of transmission to food products.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Safety emphasizes mechanistic studies involving inhibition, injury, and metabolism of food poisoning microorganisms, as well as the regulation of growth and toxin production in both model systems and complex food substrates. It also focuses on pathogens which cause food-borne illness, helping readers understand the factors affecting the initial detection of parasites, their development, transmission, and methods of control and destruction.