Binyi Huang, Peng Chen, Yibin Yao, Rong Wang, Yuchen Zhang
{"title":"利用电离层探测仪、GIMs、卫星测高和其他掩星,从 FY-3E 卫星的电子密度剖面验证电离层参数","authors":"Binyi Huang, Peng Chen, Yibin Yao, Rong Wang, Yuchen Zhang","doi":"10.1029/2024JA032590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The FengYun-3E satellite (FY-3E) is the first to feature the GNSS Occultation Sounder II (GNOS-II). Occultation is effective for ionosphere detection, but data variations between FY-3E and other techniques are inevitable due to differing instruments and methodologies. Evaluating the GNOS-II performance against other techniques is imperative. We extract ionospheric parameters—the F2 layer peak height (hmF2), F2 layer critical frequency (foF2), and Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC)—from FY-3E's electron density profile. We use ionosonde, Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs), and Satellite Altimetry (SA), along with FY-3D and COSMIC-2 to analyze FY-3E's performance. Additionally, we use the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI-2020) to normalize VTEC, eliminating systematic biases due to altitude differences. Results show that FY-3E's foF2 has high consistency with ionosonde, while hmF2 shows larger differences. However, both foF2 and hmF2 from FY-3E, FY-3D, and COSMIC-2 have comparable data quality. TEC differences between FY-3E and GIMs are greater during equinoxes and in the daytime. Significant TEC deviations are observed, particularly in low-latitude region affected by the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) during the daytime, with underestimation at EIA crests and overestimation at EIA troughs and around ±40° geomagnetic latitude, a phenomenon also observed when compared to SA. FY-3D and COSMIC-2 exhibit similar patterns, but FY-3E shows better consistency with GIMs and SA compared to FY-3D. Compared to FY-3D and FY-3E, COSMIC-2 has fewer overestimated profiles. Furthermore, FY-3E performs poorly in observing ionospheric structure in the EIA region but performs well in the Weddell Sea Anomaly (WSA) region, similar to FY-3E.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"129 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Ionospheric Parameters From Electron Density Profiles of FY-3E Satellite Using Ionosonde, GIMs, Satellite Altimetry and Other Occultations\",\"authors\":\"Binyi Huang, Peng Chen, Yibin Yao, Rong Wang, Yuchen Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JA032590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The FengYun-3E satellite (FY-3E) is the first to feature the GNSS Occultation Sounder II (GNOS-II). Occultation is effective for ionosphere detection, but data variations between FY-3E and other techniques are inevitable due to differing instruments and methodologies. Evaluating the GNOS-II performance against other techniques is imperative. We extract ionospheric parameters—the F2 layer peak height (hmF2), F2 layer critical frequency (foF2), and Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC)—from FY-3E's electron density profile. We use ionosonde, Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs), and Satellite Altimetry (SA), along with FY-3D and COSMIC-2 to analyze FY-3E's performance. Additionally, we use the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI-2020) to normalize VTEC, eliminating systematic biases due to altitude differences. Results show that FY-3E's foF2 has high consistency with ionosonde, while hmF2 shows larger differences. However, both foF2 and hmF2 from FY-3E, FY-3D, and COSMIC-2 have comparable data quality. TEC differences between FY-3E and GIMs are greater during equinoxes and in the daytime. Significant TEC deviations are observed, particularly in low-latitude region affected by the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) during the daytime, with underestimation at EIA crests and overestimation at EIA troughs and around ±40° geomagnetic latitude, a phenomenon also observed when compared to SA. FY-3D and COSMIC-2 exhibit similar patterns, but FY-3E shows better consistency with GIMs and SA compared to FY-3D. Compared to FY-3D and FY-3E, COSMIC-2 has fewer overestimated profiles. Furthermore, FY-3E performs poorly in observing ionospheric structure in the EIA region but performs well in the Weddell Sea Anomaly (WSA) region, similar to FY-3E.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"volume\":\"129 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA032590\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA032590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of Ionospheric Parameters From Electron Density Profiles of FY-3E Satellite Using Ionosonde, GIMs, Satellite Altimetry and Other Occultations
The FengYun-3E satellite (FY-3E) is the first to feature the GNSS Occultation Sounder II (GNOS-II). Occultation is effective for ionosphere detection, but data variations between FY-3E and other techniques are inevitable due to differing instruments and methodologies. Evaluating the GNOS-II performance against other techniques is imperative. We extract ionospheric parameters—the F2 layer peak height (hmF2), F2 layer critical frequency (foF2), and Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC)—from FY-3E's electron density profile. We use ionosonde, Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs), and Satellite Altimetry (SA), along with FY-3D and COSMIC-2 to analyze FY-3E's performance. Additionally, we use the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI-2020) to normalize VTEC, eliminating systematic biases due to altitude differences. Results show that FY-3E's foF2 has high consistency with ionosonde, while hmF2 shows larger differences. However, both foF2 and hmF2 from FY-3E, FY-3D, and COSMIC-2 have comparable data quality. TEC differences between FY-3E and GIMs are greater during equinoxes and in the daytime. Significant TEC deviations are observed, particularly in low-latitude region affected by the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) during the daytime, with underestimation at EIA crests and overestimation at EIA troughs and around ±40° geomagnetic latitude, a phenomenon also observed when compared to SA. FY-3D and COSMIC-2 exhibit similar patterns, but FY-3E shows better consistency with GIMs and SA compared to FY-3D. Compared to FY-3D and FY-3E, COSMIC-2 has fewer overestimated profiles. Furthermore, FY-3E performs poorly in observing ionospheric structure in the EIA region but performs well in the Weddell Sea Anomaly (WSA) region, similar to FY-3E.