组织失范:家庭护理工作者工作经验与组织规范结构的质性研究

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Renate Syre, Sara Berntzen, Jeannie Haukeland, Ali Teymoori
{"title":"组织失范:家庭护理工作者工作经验与组织规范结构的质性研究","authors":"Renate Syre,&nbsp;Sara Berntzen,&nbsp;Jeannie Haukeland,&nbsp;Ali Teymoori","doi":"10.1002/casp.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The organisational environment and work design dramatically influence employees' performance, wellbeing and identity. However, little is known about how organisational normative structure – that is, the set of general values and shared norms that regulate individuals' behaviours in a community or an organisation – influences employees experiences and wellbeing. We apply the concept of anomie to explore how Norwegian homecare workers (HCWs) experience their working environment, the normative structure of their organisation and its influence on their performance, wellbeing and identity. We examine organisational anomie in terms of perceptions of a discrepancy between job demands, various expectations and job resources as well as a discrepancy between one's normative ideals of care and the organisational work design to fulfil the caring duties and obligations. We conducted a qualitative interview study, recruiting 10 HCWs in Norway. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we developed the following five major themes to describe HCWs' understanding of their working environment and its influence: (1) The only sure thing is that anything can happen, (2) Multiple affordances of home as a context for care, (3) Conflict between normative beliefs and the organisational working environment, (4) Time pressure affects presence and (5) Did I do a good enough job? We discuss these themes with regard to their practical implications for the homecare institution and the theoretical implications for extending anomie theories to the organisational context.</p>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/casp.70027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organisational Anomie: A Qualitative Study on Homecare Workers' Experiences of Work and Organisational Normative Structure\",\"authors\":\"Renate Syre,&nbsp;Sara Berntzen,&nbsp;Jeannie Haukeland,&nbsp;Ali Teymoori\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/casp.70027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The organisational environment and work design dramatically influence employees' performance, wellbeing and identity. However, little is known about how organisational normative structure – that is, the set of general values and shared norms that regulate individuals' behaviours in a community or an organisation – influences employees experiences and wellbeing. We apply the concept of anomie to explore how Norwegian homecare workers (HCWs) experience their working environment, the normative structure of their organisation and its influence on their performance, wellbeing and identity. We examine organisational anomie in terms of perceptions of a discrepancy between job demands, various expectations and job resources as well as a discrepancy between one's normative ideals of care and the organisational work design to fulfil the caring duties and obligations. We conducted a qualitative interview study, recruiting 10 HCWs in Norway. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we developed the following five major themes to describe HCWs' understanding of their working environment and its influence: (1) The only sure thing is that anything can happen, (2) Multiple affordances of home as a context for care, (3) Conflict between normative beliefs and the organisational working environment, (4) Time pressure affects presence and (5) Did I do a good enough job? We discuss these themes with regard to their practical implications for the homecare institution and the theoretical implications for extending anomie theories to the organisational context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/casp.70027\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织环境和工作设计极大地影响着员工的绩效、幸福感和认同感。然而,关于组织规范结构(即规范社区或组织中个人行为的一套一般价值观和共同规范)如何影响员工体验和幸福感,我们知之甚少。我们运用失范的概念来探索挪威家庭护理工作者(HCWs)如何体验他们的工作环境,他们组织的规范结构及其对他们的表现,福祉和身份的影响。我们从工作需求、各种期望和工作资源之间的差异,以及个人的规范关怀理想与履行关怀职责和义务的组织工作设计之间的差异的感知角度来研究组织失范。我们进行了定性访谈研究,在挪威招募了10名医护人员。使用反身性主题分析,我们开发了以下五个主要主题来描述医护人员对其工作环境及其影响的理解:(1)唯一确定的事情是任何事情都可能发生;(2)家庭作为护理环境的多重支持;(3)规范信念与组织工作环境之间的冲突;(4)时间压力影响存在;(5)我是否做得足够好?我们将讨论这些主题对家庭护理机构的实际意义以及将失范理论扩展到组织背景的理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Organisational Anomie: A Qualitative Study on Homecare Workers' Experiences of Work and Organisational Normative Structure

Organisational Anomie: A Qualitative Study on Homecare Workers' Experiences of Work and Organisational Normative Structure

The organisational environment and work design dramatically influence employees' performance, wellbeing and identity. However, little is known about how organisational normative structure – that is, the set of general values and shared norms that regulate individuals' behaviours in a community or an organisation – influences employees experiences and wellbeing. We apply the concept of anomie to explore how Norwegian homecare workers (HCWs) experience their working environment, the normative structure of their organisation and its influence on their performance, wellbeing and identity. We examine organisational anomie in terms of perceptions of a discrepancy between job demands, various expectations and job resources as well as a discrepancy between one's normative ideals of care and the organisational work design to fulfil the caring duties and obligations. We conducted a qualitative interview study, recruiting 10 HCWs in Norway. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we developed the following five major themes to describe HCWs' understanding of their working environment and its influence: (1) The only sure thing is that anything can happen, (2) Multiple affordances of home as a context for care, (3) Conflict between normative beliefs and the organisational working environment, (4) Time pressure affects presence and (5) Did I do a good enough job? We discuss these themes with regard to their practical implications for the homecare institution and the theoretical implications for extending anomie theories to the organisational context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信