基于实验的砌体光损伤上阈值面内漂移限值

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Paul A. Korswagen, Jan G. Rots, Karel C. Terwel
{"title":"基于实验的砌体光损伤上阈值面内漂移限值","authors":"Paul A. Korswagen,&nbsp;Jan G. Rots,&nbsp;Karel C. Terwel","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drift limits are useful thresholds; during design or retrofitting analyses, engineers can compare the expected behaviour of a structure to drift limits that predict when the structure will reach a certain condition. This helps ensure that structures satisfy specified performance goals when exposed to certain hazards. Masonry walls are susceptible to damage from lateral in-plane actions such as wind or earthquake loading; ensuring that in-plane drift remains sufficiently small will help limit this damage. Drift limits based on crack-based damage are scarce, however, with DS1 limits being extrapolated from higher damage grades based on structural strength capacity or ductility. In this work, crack-based damage is evaluated on a multitude of full-scale experimental walls surveyed with digital image correlation. This method observes the initiation and propagation of cracking. Cyclically incremental in-plane tests provide a range of drift-damage relationships. These are explored with machine learning to determine influential predictors and ultimately establish drift limits for light damage. Two types of brick masonry are explored: fired-clay and calcium-silicate. For the latter, light damage begins at an in-plane drift of 0.5 mm/m and can extend to 4.8 mm/m (or 0.48%) for the former before the masonry surpasses light damage and reaches structural damage grades. In comparison to drift limits set by other authors and (international) guidelines to characterise light damage, significant damage, or the ultimate capacity of masonry walls, the resulting drift limits for light damage from this work are set directly on the basis of experiments and are in good agreement with other authors. Most importantly, all the consulted values for ultimate capacity are much larger than the upper threshold for light damage determined herein, with limits for significant damage in the same order of magnitude. This result verifies the accuracy of the experimental crack-based characterisation used to establish the drift thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 1","pages":"86-99"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4246","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimentally-based in-plane drift limits for the upper threshold of masonry light damage\",\"authors\":\"Paul A. Korswagen,&nbsp;Jan G. Rots,&nbsp;Karel C. Terwel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eqe.4246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Drift limits are useful thresholds; during design or retrofitting analyses, engineers can compare the expected behaviour of a structure to drift limits that predict when the structure will reach a certain condition. This helps ensure that structures satisfy specified performance goals when exposed to certain hazards. Masonry walls are susceptible to damage from lateral in-plane actions such as wind or earthquake loading; ensuring that in-plane drift remains sufficiently small will help limit this damage. Drift limits based on crack-based damage are scarce, however, with DS1 limits being extrapolated from higher damage grades based on structural strength capacity or ductility. In this work, crack-based damage is evaluated on a multitude of full-scale experimental walls surveyed with digital image correlation. This method observes the initiation and propagation of cracking. Cyclically incremental in-plane tests provide a range of drift-damage relationships. These are explored with machine learning to determine influential predictors and ultimately establish drift limits for light damage. Two types of brick masonry are explored: fired-clay and calcium-silicate. For the latter, light damage begins at an in-plane drift of 0.5 mm/m and can extend to 4.8 mm/m (or 0.48%) for the former before the masonry surpasses light damage and reaches structural damage grades. In comparison to drift limits set by other authors and (international) guidelines to characterise light damage, significant damage, or the ultimate capacity of masonry walls, the resulting drift limits for light damage from this work are set directly on the basis of experiments and are in good agreement with other authors. Most importantly, all the consulted values for ultimate capacity are much larger than the upper threshold for light damage determined herein, with limits for significant damage in the same order of magnitude. This result verifies the accuracy of the experimental crack-based characterisation used to establish the drift thresholds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"86-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4246\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4246\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

漂移限值是有用的阈值;在设计或改造分析过程中,工程师可以将结构的预期行为与漂移限值进行比较,从而预测结构何时会达到某种状态。这有助于确保结构在暴露于特定危险时满足指定的性能目标。砌体墙容易受到横向平面作用(如风荷载或地震荷载)的破坏;确保平面内漂移足够小将有助于限制这种破坏。然而,基于裂缝破坏的漂移限值并不多见,DS1 限值是根据结构强度能力或延展性从更高的破坏等级中推断出来的。在这项工作中,利用数字图像相关技术对大量全尺寸实验墙进行了基于裂缝的损伤评估。这种方法可以观察到裂缝的产生和扩展。循环增量面内测试提供了一系列漂移-损坏关系。通过机器学习对这些关系进行探索,以确定有影响力的预测因素,并最终确定轻度损坏的漂移限制。研究了两种砖砌体:烧结粘土砖和硅酸钙砖。对于后者,轻度破坏始于 0.5 mm/m 的平面内漂移,而对于前者,在砌体超过轻度破坏并达到结构破坏等级之前,轻度破坏可扩展至 4.8 mm/m(或 0.48%)。与其他作者和(国际)指南为描述砌体墙体的轻度破坏、严重破坏或极限承载力而设定的漂移限值相比,本研究得出的轻度破坏漂移限值是直接根据实验设定的,与其他作者的结果非常一致。最重要的是,所有参考的极限承载力值都远大于本文确定的轻度破坏上限值,重度破坏的限值也在同一数量级。这一结果验证了用于确定漂移阈值的基于裂纹的实验表征的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Experimentally-based in-plane drift limits for the upper threshold of masonry light damage

Experimentally-based in-plane drift limits for the upper threshold of masonry light damage

Drift limits are useful thresholds; during design or retrofitting analyses, engineers can compare the expected behaviour of a structure to drift limits that predict when the structure will reach a certain condition. This helps ensure that structures satisfy specified performance goals when exposed to certain hazards. Masonry walls are susceptible to damage from lateral in-plane actions such as wind or earthquake loading; ensuring that in-plane drift remains sufficiently small will help limit this damage. Drift limits based on crack-based damage are scarce, however, with DS1 limits being extrapolated from higher damage grades based on structural strength capacity or ductility. In this work, crack-based damage is evaluated on a multitude of full-scale experimental walls surveyed with digital image correlation. This method observes the initiation and propagation of cracking. Cyclically incremental in-plane tests provide a range of drift-damage relationships. These are explored with machine learning to determine influential predictors and ultimately establish drift limits for light damage. Two types of brick masonry are explored: fired-clay and calcium-silicate. For the latter, light damage begins at an in-plane drift of 0.5 mm/m and can extend to 4.8 mm/m (or 0.48%) for the former before the masonry surpasses light damage and reaches structural damage grades. In comparison to drift limits set by other authors and (international) guidelines to characterise light damage, significant damage, or the ultimate capacity of masonry walls, the resulting drift limits for light damage from this work are set directly on the basis of experiments and are in good agreement with other authors. Most importantly, all the consulted values for ultimate capacity are much larger than the upper threshold for light damage determined herein, with limits for significant damage in the same order of magnitude. This result verifies the accuracy of the experimental crack-based characterisation used to establish the drift thresholds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信