南佛罗里达居民对美洲鳄及其管理的看法和容忍度

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Vincent R. Deem, Matteo Cleary, David A. Steen
{"title":"南佛罗里达居民对美洲鳄及其管理的看法和容忍度","authors":"Vincent R. Deem,&nbsp;Matteo Cleary,&nbsp;David A. Steen","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The American crocodile (<i>Crocodylus acutus</i>) is a federally and state-protected species classified as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the State of Florida; however, its population has increased since gaining legal protection in 1967. Concurrently, the number of reported human–crocodile conflicts has also increased, analogous to known conflicts surrounding other large (typically terrestrial) predators recovering from historical population declines. Although biology and ecology are the foundation of effective wildlife management strategies, human dimensions need to be considered to develop realistic and attainable conservation objectives. To better understand how South Florida residents perceive American crocodiles and their management, we used a mixed-mode internet and mail survey. We obtained survey data from 28 May 2021 to 20 September 2021 from people living within the range of the American crocodile in Florida. There was little variation in opinions of 6 management actions presented for consideration under each of 3 different human–crocodile interaction scenarios. The strongest consensus was around euthanizing a crocodile (highly unacceptable under all 3 scenarios) with the management action of leaving the crocodile alone and monitoring the situation showing the least amount of consensus and shifting from slightly acceptable to slightly unacceptable the closer a hypothetical crocodile was in proximity to a resident's private property. Regression modeling showed respondents who were older, female, and those with children at home were less likely to prefer an increase in the crocodile population. Respondents who perceived more benefits from crocodiles and less risk from them tended to be relatively knowledgeable about crocodiles, had higher trust in the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), and were more likely to prefer a larger crocodile population. Further, spatial mapping revealed variation in tolerance for crocodiles and trust in FWC's ability to manage them. We reveal opportunities for targeted education and outreach efforts with the potential to affect tolerance of a large reptilian carnivore in a region experiencing rapid human development.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions and tolerance of American crocodiles and their management by South Florida residents\",\"authors\":\"Vincent R. Deem,&nbsp;Matteo Cleary,&nbsp;David A. Steen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.22672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The American crocodile (<i>Crocodylus acutus</i>) is a federally and state-protected species classified as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the State of Florida; however, its population has increased since gaining legal protection in 1967. Concurrently, the number of reported human–crocodile conflicts has also increased, analogous to known conflicts surrounding other large (typically terrestrial) predators recovering from historical population declines. Although biology and ecology are the foundation of effective wildlife management strategies, human dimensions need to be considered to develop realistic and attainable conservation objectives. To better understand how South Florida residents perceive American crocodiles and their management, we used a mixed-mode internet and mail survey. We obtained survey data from 28 May 2021 to 20 September 2021 from people living within the range of the American crocodile in Florida. There was little variation in opinions of 6 management actions presented for consideration under each of 3 different human–crocodile interaction scenarios. The strongest consensus was around euthanizing a crocodile (highly unacceptable under all 3 scenarios) with the management action of leaving the crocodile alone and monitoring the situation showing the least amount of consensus and shifting from slightly acceptable to slightly unacceptable the closer a hypothetical crocodile was in proximity to a resident's private property. Regression modeling showed respondents who were older, female, and those with children at home were less likely to prefer an increase in the crocodile population. Respondents who perceived more benefits from crocodiles and less risk from them tended to be relatively knowledgeable about crocodiles, had higher trust in the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), and were more likely to prefer a larger crocodile population. Further, spatial mapping revealed variation in tolerance for crocodiles and trust in FWC's ability to manage them. We reveal opportunities for targeted education and outreach efforts with the potential to affect tolerance of a large reptilian carnivore in a region experiencing rapid human development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22672\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美洲鳄(Crocodylus acutus)是受联邦和州保护的物种,被美国鱼类和野生动物管理局和佛罗里达州列为受威胁物种;然而,自1967年获得法律保护以来,其人口有所增加。与此同时,报道的人类与鳄鱼冲突的数量也有所增加,类似于围绕其他大型(通常是陆地)食肉动物的已知冲突,这些食肉动物从历史上的数量下降中恢复过来。虽然生物学和生态学是有效的野生动物管理战略的基础,但在制定现实和可实现的保护目标时,需要考虑人的因素。为了更好地了解南佛罗里达居民如何看待美国鳄鱼及其管理,我们使用了混合模式的互联网和邮件调查。我们获得了2021年5月28日至2021年9月20日居住在佛罗里达州美洲鳄鱼范围内的人们的调查数据。在三种不同的人-鳄鱼互动场景下,提出的6项管理措施的意见几乎没有变化。最强烈的共识是对鳄鱼实施安乐死(在所有三种情况下都是高度不可接受的),管理行动是让鳄鱼独自一人,并监测情况,显示出最少的共识,并且随着假设的鳄鱼离居民的私人财产越近,从稍微可接受到稍微不可接受的转变。回归模型显示,年龄较大、女性和家中有孩子的受访者不太可能喜欢鳄鱼数量的增加。那些认为鳄鱼带来的好处更多、风险更小的受访者往往对鳄鱼比较了解,对佛罗里达州鱼类和野生动物保护委员会(FWC)有更高的信任,更有可能喜欢更多的鳄鱼种群。此外,空间映射揭示了对鳄鱼的容忍度和对FWC管理鳄鱼能力的信任的差异。我们揭示了有针对性的教育和推广工作的机会,有可能影响一个地区的大型爬行类食肉动物的耐受性经历人类的快速发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Perceptions and tolerance of American crocodiles and their management by South Florida residents

Perceptions and tolerance of American crocodiles and their management by South Florida residents

The American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) is a federally and state-protected species classified as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the State of Florida; however, its population has increased since gaining legal protection in 1967. Concurrently, the number of reported human–crocodile conflicts has also increased, analogous to known conflicts surrounding other large (typically terrestrial) predators recovering from historical population declines. Although biology and ecology are the foundation of effective wildlife management strategies, human dimensions need to be considered to develop realistic and attainable conservation objectives. To better understand how South Florida residents perceive American crocodiles and their management, we used a mixed-mode internet and mail survey. We obtained survey data from 28 May 2021 to 20 September 2021 from people living within the range of the American crocodile in Florida. There was little variation in opinions of 6 management actions presented for consideration under each of 3 different human–crocodile interaction scenarios. The strongest consensus was around euthanizing a crocodile (highly unacceptable under all 3 scenarios) with the management action of leaving the crocodile alone and monitoring the situation showing the least amount of consensus and shifting from slightly acceptable to slightly unacceptable the closer a hypothetical crocodile was in proximity to a resident's private property. Regression modeling showed respondents who were older, female, and those with children at home were less likely to prefer an increase in the crocodile population. Respondents who perceived more benefits from crocodiles and less risk from them tended to be relatively knowledgeable about crocodiles, had higher trust in the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), and were more likely to prefer a larger crocodile population. Further, spatial mapping revealed variation in tolerance for crocodiles and trust in FWC's ability to manage them. We reveal opportunities for targeted education and outreach efforts with the potential to affect tolerance of a large reptilian carnivore in a region experiencing rapid human development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信