利用基于机器学习的QSAR模型克服β -内酰胺酶抑制剂筛选中的独立共识对接限制:一项概念验证研究

IF 4.3 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Thanet Pitakbut, Jennifer Munkert, Wenhui Xi, Yanjie Wei, Gregor Fuhrmann
{"title":"利用基于机器学习的QSAR模型克服β -内酰胺酶抑制剂筛选中的独立共识对接限制:一项概念验证研究","authors":"Thanet Pitakbut,&nbsp;Jennifer Munkert,&nbsp;Wenhui Xi,&nbsp;Yanjie Wei,&nbsp;Gregor Fuhrmann","doi":"10.1186/s13065-024-01324-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In virtual drug screening, consensus docking is a standard in-silico approach consisting of a combined result from optimized docking experiments, a minimum of two results combination. Therefore, consensus docking is subjected to a lower success rate than the best docking method due to its mathematical nature, an unavoidable limitation. This study aims to overcome this drawback via random forest, an ensemble machine learning model. First, in vitro beta-lactamase inhibitory screening was performed using an in-house chemical library. The in vitro results were later used as a validation. Consequently, we optimized docking protocols for AutoDock Vina and DOCK6 programs. With an appropriate scoring function, we found that DOCK6 could identify up to 70% of all active molecules, double the inappropriate. Further consensus analysis reduced the success rate to 50%. Simultaneously, a false positive rate was down to 16%, which was experimentally favorable for a drug search. Finally, we trained two quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models using logistic regression as a reference model and a random forest as a test model. After combining consensus docking results, random forest-based QSAR outperformed a logistic regression by restoring the success rate to 70% and maintaining a low false positive rate of around 21%. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the benefit of using a random forest (machine learning)-based QSAR model to overcome a standard consensus docking limitation in beta-lactamase inhibitor search as a proof-of-concept.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":496,"journal":{"name":"BMC Chemistry","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13065-024-01324-x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing machine learning-based QSAR model to overcome standalone consensus docking limitation in beta-lactamase inhibitors screening: a proof-of-concept study\",\"authors\":\"Thanet Pitakbut,&nbsp;Jennifer Munkert,&nbsp;Wenhui Xi,&nbsp;Yanjie Wei,&nbsp;Gregor Fuhrmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13065-024-01324-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In virtual drug screening, consensus docking is a standard in-silico approach consisting of a combined result from optimized docking experiments, a minimum of two results combination. Therefore, consensus docking is subjected to a lower success rate than the best docking method due to its mathematical nature, an unavoidable limitation. This study aims to overcome this drawback via random forest, an ensemble machine learning model. First, in vitro beta-lactamase inhibitory screening was performed using an in-house chemical library. The in vitro results were later used as a validation. Consequently, we optimized docking protocols for AutoDock Vina and DOCK6 programs. With an appropriate scoring function, we found that DOCK6 could identify up to 70% of all active molecules, double the inappropriate. Further consensus analysis reduced the success rate to 50%. Simultaneously, a false positive rate was down to 16%, which was experimentally favorable for a drug search. Finally, we trained two quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models using logistic regression as a reference model and a random forest as a test model. After combining consensus docking results, random forest-based QSAR outperformed a logistic regression by restoring the success rate to 70% and maintaining a low false positive rate of around 21%. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the benefit of using a random forest (machine learning)-based QSAR model to overcome a standard consensus docking limitation in beta-lactamase inhibitor search as a proof-of-concept.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13065-024-01324-x\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-024-01324-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-024-01324-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在虚拟药物筛选中,共识对接是一种标准的芯片方法,由优化对接实验的结果组合而成,至少两个结果组合。因此,由于其数学性质,共识对接的成功率低于最佳对接方法,这是一个不可避免的局限性。本研究旨在通过随机森林(一种集成机器学习模型)来克服这一缺点。首先,利用内部化学文库进行体外β -内酰胺酶抑制筛选。体外结果后来被用作验证。因此,我们优化了AutoDock Vina和DOCK6程序的对接协议。通过适当的评分函数,我们发现DOCK6可以识别多达70%的所有活性分子,是不适当的两倍。进一步的共识分析将成功率降低到50%。同时,假阳性率下降到16%,这在实验上对药物搜索是有利的。最后,我们以逻辑回归作为参考模型,随机森林作为检验模型,训练了两个定量构效关系(QSAR)模型。在结合共识对接结果后,基于随机森林的QSAR优于逻辑回归,将成功率恢复到70%,并保持21%左右的低假阳性率。总之,作为概念验证,本研究证明了使用基于随机森林(机器学习)的QSAR模型克服β -内酰胺酶抑制剂搜索中的标准共识对接限制的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing machine learning-based QSAR model to overcome standalone consensus docking limitation in beta-lactamase inhibitors screening: a proof-of-concept study

In virtual drug screening, consensus docking is a standard in-silico approach consisting of a combined result from optimized docking experiments, a minimum of two results combination. Therefore, consensus docking is subjected to a lower success rate than the best docking method due to its mathematical nature, an unavoidable limitation. This study aims to overcome this drawback via random forest, an ensemble machine learning model. First, in vitro beta-lactamase inhibitory screening was performed using an in-house chemical library. The in vitro results were later used as a validation. Consequently, we optimized docking protocols for AutoDock Vina and DOCK6 programs. With an appropriate scoring function, we found that DOCK6 could identify up to 70% of all active molecules, double the inappropriate. Further consensus analysis reduced the success rate to 50%. Simultaneously, a false positive rate was down to 16%, which was experimentally favorable for a drug search. Finally, we trained two quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models using logistic regression as a reference model and a random forest as a test model. After combining consensus docking results, random forest-based QSAR outperformed a logistic regression by restoring the success rate to 70% and maintaining a low false positive rate of around 21%. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the benefit of using a random forest (machine learning)-based QSAR model to overcome a standard consensus docking limitation in beta-lactamase inhibitor search as a proof-of-concept.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Chemistry
BMC Chemistry Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
92
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Chemistry, formerly known as Chemistry Central Journal, is now part of the BMC series journals family. Chemistry Central Journal has served the chemistry community as a trusted open access resource for more than 10 years – and we are delighted to announce the next step on its journey. In January 2019 the journal has been renamed BMC Chemistry and now strengthens the BMC series footprint in the physical sciences by publishing quality articles and by pushing the boundaries of open chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信