在中国接受体外受精-胚胎移植的妇女中,观察到的与环境PM2.5暴露有关的早期妊娠影响

Changxin Lan, Yichun Guan, Haining Luo, Xiaoling Ma, Yihua Yang, Hongchu Bao, Cuifang Hao, Xiaojin He, Han Zhang, Ning Gao, Weinan Lin, Mengyuan Ren, Tianxiang Wu, Chao Wang, Xiaoqing Ni, Chunyan Shen, Jianrui Zhang, Junfang Ma, Rui Zhang, Yin Bi, Lili Zhuang, Ruichao Miao, Ziyi Song, Tong An, Zhengteng Liu, Bo Pan, Mingliang Fang, Jing Liu, Zhipeng Bai, Fangang Meng, Yuanchen Chen, Xiaoxia Lu, Yuming Guo, Yunxia Cao*, Qun Lu* and Bin Wang*, 
{"title":"在中国接受体外受精-胚胎移植的妇女中,观察到的与环境PM2.5暴露有关的早期妊娠影响","authors":"Changxin Lan,&nbsp;Yichun Guan,&nbsp;Haining Luo,&nbsp;Xiaoling Ma,&nbsp;Yihua Yang,&nbsp;Hongchu Bao,&nbsp;Cuifang Hao,&nbsp;Xiaojin He,&nbsp;Han Zhang,&nbsp;Ning Gao,&nbsp;Weinan Lin,&nbsp;Mengyuan Ren,&nbsp;Tianxiang Wu,&nbsp;Chao Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Ni,&nbsp;Chunyan Shen,&nbsp;Jianrui Zhang,&nbsp;Junfang Ma,&nbsp;Rui Zhang,&nbsp;Yin Bi,&nbsp;Lili Zhuang,&nbsp;Ruichao Miao,&nbsp;Ziyi Song,&nbsp;Tong An,&nbsp;Zhengteng Liu,&nbsp;Bo Pan,&nbsp;Mingliang Fang,&nbsp;Jing Liu,&nbsp;Zhipeng Bai,&nbsp;Fangang Meng,&nbsp;Yuanchen Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Lu,&nbsp;Yuming Guo,&nbsp;Yunxia Cao*,&nbsp;Qun Lu* and Bin Wang*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/envhealth.4c0010710.1021/envhealth.4c00107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The adverse effect of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on very early pregnancy (VEP) remains controversial among epidemiological studies but is supported by toxicological evidence. We adopted a multicenter retrospective cohort of 141,040 cycles to evaluate the effect of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on the VEP using the <i>in vitro</i> fertilization and embryo transfer platform and high-resolution PM<sub>2.5</sub> data in China. We first investigated the association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure 1 week before and 1 week after the embryo transfer date and VEP. The average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations of the 2 weeks were approximately 47 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. The pooled results revealed a negative association between women’s accumulated PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure during the 2 weeks near the day of embryo transfer and success odds of VEP with the relative risk of 0.999 (95% CI: 0.997–0.999) at each increase of 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. The women with the fresh cycle or one transplanted embryo were considered as a vulnerable population. Furthermore, seven periods for the fresh cycle and five periods for the frozen cycle from 85 days before oocyte retrieval to the day of gestational sac detection by ultrasound detection were defined. For these exposure periods, no association between the average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and VEP risk was identified. Our study provided large-scale population evidence for the association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure near embryo transfer day and VEP and identified vulnerable populations among women undergoing <i>in vitro</i> fertilization-embryo transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":29795,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":"2 12","pages":"918–928 918–928"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/envhealth.4c00107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observed Effects on Very Early Pregnancy Linked to Ambient PM2.5 Exposure in China among Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer\",\"authors\":\"Changxin Lan,&nbsp;Yichun Guan,&nbsp;Haining Luo,&nbsp;Xiaoling Ma,&nbsp;Yihua Yang,&nbsp;Hongchu Bao,&nbsp;Cuifang Hao,&nbsp;Xiaojin He,&nbsp;Han Zhang,&nbsp;Ning Gao,&nbsp;Weinan Lin,&nbsp;Mengyuan Ren,&nbsp;Tianxiang Wu,&nbsp;Chao Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Ni,&nbsp;Chunyan Shen,&nbsp;Jianrui Zhang,&nbsp;Junfang Ma,&nbsp;Rui Zhang,&nbsp;Yin Bi,&nbsp;Lili Zhuang,&nbsp;Ruichao Miao,&nbsp;Ziyi Song,&nbsp;Tong An,&nbsp;Zhengteng Liu,&nbsp;Bo Pan,&nbsp;Mingliang Fang,&nbsp;Jing Liu,&nbsp;Zhipeng Bai,&nbsp;Fangang Meng,&nbsp;Yuanchen Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Lu,&nbsp;Yuming Guo,&nbsp;Yunxia Cao*,&nbsp;Qun Lu* and Bin Wang*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/envhealth.4c0010710.1021/envhealth.4c00107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The adverse effect of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on very early pregnancy (VEP) remains controversial among epidemiological studies but is supported by toxicological evidence. We adopted a multicenter retrospective cohort of 141,040 cycles to evaluate the effect of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on the VEP using the <i>in vitro</i> fertilization and embryo transfer platform and high-resolution PM<sub>2.5</sub> data in China. We first investigated the association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure 1 week before and 1 week after the embryo transfer date and VEP. The average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations of the 2 weeks were approximately 47 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. The pooled results revealed a negative association between women’s accumulated PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure during the 2 weeks near the day of embryo transfer and success odds of VEP with the relative risk of 0.999 (95% CI: 0.997–0.999) at each increase of 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. The women with the fresh cycle or one transplanted embryo were considered as a vulnerable population. Furthermore, seven periods for the fresh cycle and five periods for the frozen cycle from 85 days before oocyte retrieval to the day of gestational sac detection by ultrasound detection were defined. For these exposure periods, no association between the average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and VEP risk was identified. Our study provided large-scale population evidence for the association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure near embryo transfer day and VEP and identified vulnerable populations among women undergoing <i>in vitro</i> fertilization-embryo transfer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment & Health\",\"volume\":\"2 12\",\"pages\":\"918–928 918–928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/envhealth.4c00107\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.4c00107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.4c00107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在流行病学研究中,暴露于环境PM2.5对早孕(VEP)的不利影响仍存在争议,但有毒理学证据支持。我们采用141,040个周期的多中心回顾性队列,利用体外受精和胚胎移植平台和中国高分辨率PM2.5数据来评估PM2.5暴露对VEP的影响。我们首先调查了胚胎移植日期前一周和后一周PM2.5暴露与VEP之间的关系。2周平均PM2.5浓度约为47 μg/m3。综合结果显示,在胚胎移植当天的2周内,女性累积PM2.5暴露与VEP成功几率呈负相关,每增加10 μg/m3,相对风险为0.999 (95% CI: 0.997-0.999)。具有新鲜周期或一个移植胚胎的妇女被认为是弱势群体。此外,从取卵前85天到超声检测到妊娠囊当天,定义了新鲜周期7个周期和冷冻周期5个周期。在这些暴露期间,没有发现PM2.5平均暴露与VEP风险之间的关联。我们的研究为胚胎移植日附近的PM2.5暴露与VEP之间的关系提供了大规模的人群证据,并确定了接受体外受精-胚胎移植的妇女中的脆弱人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observed Effects on Very Early Pregnancy Linked to Ambient PM2.5 Exposure in China among Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer

The adverse effect of ambient PM2.5 exposure on very early pregnancy (VEP) remains controversial among epidemiological studies but is supported by toxicological evidence. We adopted a multicenter retrospective cohort of 141,040 cycles to evaluate the effect of PM2.5 exposure on the VEP using the in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer platform and high-resolution PM2.5 data in China. We first investigated the association between PM2.5 exposure 1 week before and 1 week after the embryo transfer date and VEP. The average PM2.5 concentrations of the 2 weeks were approximately 47 μg/m3. The pooled results revealed a negative association between women’s accumulated PM2.5 exposure during the 2 weeks near the day of embryo transfer and success odds of VEP with the relative risk of 0.999 (95% CI: 0.997–0.999) at each increase of 10 μg/m3. The women with the fresh cycle or one transplanted embryo were considered as a vulnerable population. Furthermore, seven periods for the fresh cycle and five periods for the frozen cycle from 85 days before oocyte retrieval to the day of gestational sac detection by ultrasound detection were defined. For these exposure periods, no association between the average PM2.5 exposure and VEP risk was identified. Our study provided large-scale population evidence for the association between PM2.5 exposure near embryo transfer day and VEP and identified vulnerable populations among women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environment & Health
Environment & Health 环境科学、健康科学-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Environment & Health a peer-reviewed open access journal is committed to exploring the relationship between the environment and human health.As a premier journal for multidisciplinary research Environment & Health reports the health consequences for individuals and communities of changing and hazardous environmental factors. In supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals the journal aims to help formulate policies to create a healthier world.Topics of interest include but are not limited to:Air water and soil pollutionExposomicsEnvironmental epidemiologyInnovative analytical methodology and instrumentation (multi-omics non-target analysis effect-directed analysis high-throughput screening etc.)Environmental toxicology (endocrine disrupting effect neurotoxicity alternative toxicology computational toxicology epigenetic toxicology etc.)Environmental microbiology pathogen and environmental transmission mechanisms of diseasesEnvironmental modeling bioinformatics and artificial intelligenceEmerging contaminants (including plastics engineered nanomaterials etc.)Climate change and related health effectHealth impacts of energy evolution and carbon neutralizationFood and drinking water safetyOccupational exposure and medicineInnovations in environmental technologies for better healthPolicies and international relations concerned with environmental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信